Cargando…
Evaluating acoustic signals to reduce avian collision risk
Collisions with human-made structures are responsible for billions of bird deaths each year, resulting in ecological damage as well as regulatory and financial burdens to many industries. Acoustic signals can alert birds to obstacles in their flight paths in order to mitigate collisions, but these s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573177 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13313 |
_version_ | 1784707712431423488 |
---|---|
author | Thady, Robin G. Emerson, Lauren C. Swaddle, John P. |
author_facet | Thady, Robin G. Emerson, Lauren C. Swaddle, John P. |
author_sort | Thady, Robin G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Collisions with human-made structures are responsible for billions of bird deaths each year, resulting in ecological damage as well as regulatory and financial burdens to many industries. Acoustic signals can alert birds to obstacles in their flight paths in order to mitigate collisions, but these signals should be tailored to the sensory ecology of birds in flight as the effectiveness of various acoustic signals potentially depends on the influence of background noise and the relative ability of various sound types to propagate within a landscape. We measured changes in flight behaviors from zebra finches released into a flight corridor containing a physical obstacle, either in no-additional-sound control conditions or when exposed to one of four acoustic signals. We selected signals to test two frequency ranges (4–6 kHz or 6–8 kHz) and two temporal modulation patterns (broadband or frequency-modulated oscillating) to determine whether any particular combination of sound attributes elicited the strongest collision avoidance behaviors. We found that, relative to control flights, all sound treatments caused birds to maintain a greater distance from hazards and to adjust their flight trajectories before coming close to obstacles. There were no statistical differences among different sound treatments, but consistent trends within the data suggest that the 4–6 kHz frequency-modulated oscillating signal elicited the strongest avoidance behaviors. We conclude that a variety of acoustic signals can be effective as avian collision deterrents, at least in the context in which we tested these birds. These results may be most directly applicable in scenarios when birds are at risk of collisions with solid structures, such as wind turbines and communication towers, as opposed to window collisions or collisions involving artificial lighting. We recommend the incorporation of acoustic signals into multimodal collision deterrents and demonstrate the value of using behavioral data to assess collision risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9104101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91041012022-05-14 Evaluating acoustic signals to reduce avian collision risk Thady, Robin G. Emerson, Lauren C. Swaddle, John P. PeerJ Animal Behavior Collisions with human-made structures are responsible for billions of bird deaths each year, resulting in ecological damage as well as regulatory and financial burdens to many industries. Acoustic signals can alert birds to obstacles in their flight paths in order to mitigate collisions, but these signals should be tailored to the sensory ecology of birds in flight as the effectiveness of various acoustic signals potentially depends on the influence of background noise and the relative ability of various sound types to propagate within a landscape. We measured changes in flight behaviors from zebra finches released into a flight corridor containing a physical obstacle, either in no-additional-sound control conditions or when exposed to one of four acoustic signals. We selected signals to test two frequency ranges (4–6 kHz or 6–8 kHz) and two temporal modulation patterns (broadband or frequency-modulated oscillating) to determine whether any particular combination of sound attributes elicited the strongest collision avoidance behaviors. We found that, relative to control flights, all sound treatments caused birds to maintain a greater distance from hazards and to adjust their flight trajectories before coming close to obstacles. There were no statistical differences among different sound treatments, but consistent trends within the data suggest that the 4–6 kHz frequency-modulated oscillating signal elicited the strongest avoidance behaviors. We conclude that a variety of acoustic signals can be effective as avian collision deterrents, at least in the context in which we tested these birds. These results may be most directly applicable in scenarios when birds are at risk of collisions with solid structures, such as wind turbines and communication towers, as opposed to window collisions or collisions involving artificial lighting. We recommend the incorporation of acoustic signals into multimodal collision deterrents and demonstrate the value of using behavioral data to assess collision risk. PeerJ Inc. 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9104101/ /pubmed/35573177 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13313 Text en ©2022 Thady et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behavior Thady, Robin G. Emerson, Lauren C. Swaddle, John P. Evaluating acoustic signals to reduce avian collision risk |
title | Evaluating acoustic signals to reduce avian collision risk |
title_full | Evaluating acoustic signals to reduce avian collision risk |
title_fullStr | Evaluating acoustic signals to reduce avian collision risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating acoustic signals to reduce avian collision risk |
title_short | Evaluating acoustic signals to reduce avian collision risk |
title_sort | evaluating acoustic signals to reduce avian collision risk |
topic | Animal Behavior |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573177 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thadyrobing evaluatingacousticsignalstoreduceaviancollisionrisk AT emersonlaurenc evaluatingacousticsignalstoreduceaviancollisionrisk AT swaddlejohnp evaluatingacousticsignalstoreduceaviancollisionrisk |