Cargando…

“I’ll leave that to the case managers.” Healthcare Service Providers‘ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in a Randomized Controlled Trial—A Qualitative Analysis Exploring Implementation Success

Up to 50% of unsuccessful implementations of organizational change are due to a lack of organizational readiness for change (ORC). This qualitative study aims to investigate the experiences of occupational physicians (OPs) and staff of test and training centers (ETTCs) with team effectiveness in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna), Lindert, Lara, Schlomann, Lara, Pfaff, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095782
_version_ 1784707775739199488
author Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
Lindert, Lara
Schlomann, Lara
Pfaff, Holger
author_facet Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
Lindert, Lara
Schlomann, Lara
Pfaff, Holger
author_sort Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
collection PubMed
description Up to 50% of unsuccessful implementations of organizational change are due to a lack of organizational readiness for change (ORC). This qualitative study aims to investigate the experiences of occupational physicians (OPs) and staff of test and training centers (ETTCs) with team effectiveness in the context of ORC. The change setting is the implementation of a new occupational health program in a multicentric randomized controlled trial for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in Germany. Two rounds of expert interviews with OPs (1st round: n = 10, 2nd round: n = 13) and one round of expert interviews with ETTCs (n = 9) were conducted and analyzed with a deductive–inductive procedure. The focus of the analysis was the assessment of change commitment and change efficacy, as well as their influence on general ORC on a collective level according to Weiner’s model (2009). Differential critical assessment of change by the care providers led to a missing collective change commitment and consequently to a missing organizational change commitment. Main inhibiting factors include lacking feedback about (e.g., recruitment) success, limited time resources of and narrow communication between responsible study staff, along with a low rate of utilization and limited adherence of the study population. Main facilitators include standardized procedures and documentation along with easy-access digital tools. Researchers may use the findings to improve the development of new intervention studies, especially in a randomized setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9104361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91043612022-05-14 “I’ll leave that to the case managers.” Healthcare Service Providers‘ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in a Randomized Controlled Trial—A Qualitative Analysis Exploring Implementation Success Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna) Lindert, Lara Schlomann, Lara Pfaff, Holger Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Up to 50% of unsuccessful implementations of organizational change are due to a lack of organizational readiness for change (ORC). This qualitative study aims to investigate the experiences of occupational physicians (OPs) and staff of test and training centers (ETTCs) with team effectiveness in the context of ORC. The change setting is the implementation of a new occupational health program in a multicentric randomized controlled trial for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in Germany. Two rounds of expert interviews with OPs (1st round: n = 10, 2nd round: n = 13) and one round of expert interviews with ETTCs (n = 9) were conducted and analyzed with a deductive–inductive procedure. The focus of the analysis was the assessment of change commitment and change efficacy, as well as their influence on general ORC on a collective level according to Weiner’s model (2009). Differential critical assessment of change by the care providers led to a missing collective change commitment and consequently to a missing organizational change commitment. Main inhibiting factors include lacking feedback about (e.g., recruitment) success, limited time resources of and narrow communication between responsible study staff, along with a low rate of utilization and limited adherence of the study population. Main facilitators include standardized procedures and documentation along with easy-access digital tools. Researchers may use the findings to improve the development of new intervention studies, especially in a randomized setting. MDPI 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9104361/ /pubmed/35565177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095782 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
Lindert, Lara
Schlomann, Lara
Pfaff, Holger
“I’ll leave that to the case managers.” Healthcare Service Providers‘ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in a Randomized Controlled Trial—A Qualitative Analysis Exploring Implementation Success
title “I’ll leave that to the case managers.” Healthcare Service Providers‘ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in a Randomized Controlled Trial—A Qualitative Analysis Exploring Implementation Success
title_full “I’ll leave that to the case managers.” Healthcare Service Providers‘ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in a Randomized Controlled Trial—A Qualitative Analysis Exploring Implementation Success
title_fullStr “I’ll leave that to the case managers.” Healthcare Service Providers‘ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in a Randomized Controlled Trial—A Qualitative Analysis Exploring Implementation Success
title_full_unstemmed “I’ll leave that to the case managers.” Healthcare Service Providers‘ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in a Randomized Controlled Trial—A Qualitative Analysis Exploring Implementation Success
title_short “I’ll leave that to the case managers.” Healthcare Service Providers‘ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in a Randomized Controlled Trial—A Qualitative Analysis Exploring Implementation Success
title_sort “i’ll leave that to the case managers.” healthcare service providers‘ perceptions of organizational readiness for change in a randomized controlled trial—a qualitative analysis exploring implementation success
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095782
work_keys_str_mv AT choikyungeunanna illleavethattothecasemanagershealthcareserviceprovidersperceptionsoforganizationalreadinessforchangeinarandomizedcontrolledtrialaqualitativeanalysisexploringimplementationsuccess
AT lindertlara illleavethattothecasemanagershealthcareserviceprovidersperceptionsoforganizationalreadinessforchangeinarandomizedcontrolledtrialaqualitativeanalysisexploringimplementationsuccess
AT schlomannlara illleavethattothecasemanagershealthcareserviceprovidersperceptionsoforganizationalreadinessforchangeinarandomizedcontrolledtrialaqualitativeanalysisexploringimplementationsuccess
AT pfaffholger illleavethattothecasemanagershealthcareserviceprovidersperceptionsoforganizationalreadinessforchangeinarandomizedcontrolledtrialaqualitativeanalysisexploringimplementationsuccess