Cargando…
Mathematical Modeling of Monovalent Permselectivity of a Bilayer Ion-Exchange Membrane as a Function of Current Density
Modification of an ion-exchange membrane with a thin layer, the charge of which is opposite to the charge of the substrate membrane, has proven to be an effective approach to obtaining a composite membrane with permselectivity towards monovalent ions. However, the mechanism of permselectivity is not...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35563102 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094711 |
Sumario: | Modification of an ion-exchange membrane with a thin layer, the charge of which is opposite to the charge of the substrate membrane, has proven to be an effective approach to obtaining a composite membrane with permselectivity towards monovalent ions. However, the mechanism of permselectivity is not clear enough. We report a 1D model based on the Nernst–Planck–Poisson equation system. Unlike other similar models, we introduce activity coefficients, which change when passing from one layer of the membrane to another. This makes it possible to accurately take into account the fact that the substrate membranes usually selectively sorb multiply charged counterions. We show that the main cause for the change in the permselectivity coefficient, P(1/2), with increasing current density, j, is the change in the membrane/solution layer, which controls the fluxes of the competing mono- and divalent ions. At low current densities, counterion fluxes are controlled by transfer through the substrate membrane, which causes selective divalent ion transfer. When the current increases, the kinetic control goes first to the modification layer (which leads to the predominant transfer of monovalent ions) and then, at currents close to the limiting current, to the depleted diffusion layer (which results in a complete loss of the permselectivity). Thus, the dependence P(1/2) − j passes through a maximum. An analytical solution is obtained for approximate assessment of the maximum value of P(1/2) and the corresponding fluxes of the competing ions. The maximum P(1/2) values, plotted as a function of the Na(+) ion current density at which this maximum is reached, gives the theoretical trade-off curve between the membrane permselectivity and permeability of the bilayer monovalent selective ion-exchange membrane under consideration. |
---|