Cargando…
Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults
The purpose of this study aimed to develop and validate the Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese adults (FNLQ). The dimensions and core components of Food and Nutrition Literacy were constructed though literature review and qualitative consensus study. A cross-sectional survey of 85...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14091933 |
_version_ | 1784707826057216000 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yaqin Zhang, Zhaofeng Xu, Meihong Aihemaitijiang, Sumiya Ye, Chen Zhu, Wenli Ma, Guansheng |
author_facet | Zhang, Yaqin Zhang, Zhaofeng Xu, Meihong Aihemaitijiang, Sumiya Ye, Chen Zhu, Wenli Ma, Guansheng |
author_sort | Zhang, Yaqin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study aimed to develop and validate the Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese adults (FNLQ). The dimensions and core components of Food and Nutrition Literacy were constructed though literature review and qualitative consensus study. A cross-sectional survey of 8510 participants was conducted. The reliability of the questionnaire was determined by internal consistency, the construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the content validity was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient. From the literature review and qualitative methods, 20 core components and 50 questions of the FNLQ were developed, including 1 dimension of knowledge and 3 practice dimensions (ability of selection, preparing food and eating). The overall FNLQ questionnaire had good reliability and validity (Cronbach’s α = 0.893, χ2/DF = 4.750, RMSEA = 0.048, GFI = 0.891 and AGFI = 0.876). The average FNLQ score of all participants was (64.08 ± 12.77), and the score for the knowledge and understanding dimension was higher than that for the practice dimensions. In addition, 80 was set as the nutritional literacy threshold, and only 12.2% met this threshold in this survey. Sociodemographic and health status characteristics were predictors of FNLQ (R(2) = 0.287, F = 244.132, p < 0.01). In conclusion, the FNLQ built in this study had good validity and reliability. It could be considered as a reliable tool to assess Food and Nutrition Literacy of Chinese adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9104569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91045692022-05-14 Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults Zhang, Yaqin Zhang, Zhaofeng Xu, Meihong Aihemaitijiang, Sumiya Ye, Chen Zhu, Wenli Ma, Guansheng Nutrients Article The purpose of this study aimed to develop and validate the Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese adults (FNLQ). The dimensions and core components of Food and Nutrition Literacy were constructed though literature review and qualitative consensus study. A cross-sectional survey of 8510 participants was conducted. The reliability of the questionnaire was determined by internal consistency, the construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the content validity was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient. From the literature review and qualitative methods, 20 core components and 50 questions of the FNLQ were developed, including 1 dimension of knowledge and 3 practice dimensions (ability of selection, preparing food and eating). The overall FNLQ questionnaire had good reliability and validity (Cronbach’s α = 0.893, χ2/DF = 4.750, RMSEA = 0.048, GFI = 0.891 and AGFI = 0.876). The average FNLQ score of all participants was (64.08 ± 12.77), and the score for the knowledge and understanding dimension was higher than that for the practice dimensions. In addition, 80 was set as the nutritional literacy threshold, and only 12.2% met this threshold in this survey. Sociodemographic and health status characteristics were predictors of FNLQ (R(2) = 0.287, F = 244.132, p < 0.01). In conclusion, the FNLQ built in this study had good validity and reliability. It could be considered as a reliable tool to assess Food and Nutrition Literacy of Chinese adults. MDPI 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9104569/ /pubmed/35565900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14091933 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Yaqin Zhang, Zhaofeng Xu, Meihong Aihemaitijiang, Sumiya Ye, Chen Zhu, Wenli Ma, Guansheng Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults |
title | Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults |
title_full | Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults |
title_short | Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults |
title_sort | development and validation of a food and nutrition literacy questionnaire for chinese adults |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14091933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyaqin developmentandvalidationofafoodandnutritionliteracyquestionnaireforchineseadults AT zhangzhaofeng developmentandvalidationofafoodandnutritionliteracyquestionnaireforchineseadults AT xumeihong developmentandvalidationofafoodandnutritionliteracyquestionnaireforchineseadults AT aihemaitijiangsumiya developmentandvalidationofafoodandnutritionliteracyquestionnaireforchineseadults AT yechen developmentandvalidationofafoodandnutritionliteracyquestionnaireforchineseadults AT zhuwenli developmentandvalidationofafoodandnutritionliteracyquestionnaireforchineseadults AT maguansheng developmentandvalidationofafoodandnutritionliteracyquestionnaireforchineseadults |