Cargando…
Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining
The current trends in micro-/nanofibers offer a new and unmissable chance for the recovery of cellulose from non-woody crops. This work assesses a technically feasible approach for the production of micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose (MNFC) from jute, sisal and hemp, involving refining and enzymat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12091612 |
_version_ | 1784707867418296320 |
---|---|
author | Aguado, Roberto Tarrés, Quim Pèlach, Maria Àngels Mutjé, Pere de la Fuente, Elena Sanchez-Salvador, José L. Negro, Carlos Delgado-Aguilar, Marc |
author_facet | Aguado, Roberto Tarrés, Quim Pèlach, Maria Àngels Mutjé, Pere de la Fuente, Elena Sanchez-Salvador, José L. Negro, Carlos Delgado-Aguilar, Marc |
author_sort | Aguado, Roberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current trends in micro-/nanofibers offer a new and unmissable chance for the recovery of cellulose from non-woody crops. This work assesses a technically feasible approach for the production of micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose (MNFC) from jute, sisal and hemp, involving refining and enzymatic hydrolysis as pretreatments. Regarding the latter, only slight enhancements of nanofibrillation, transparency and specific surface area were recorded when increasing the dose of endoglucanases from 80 to 240 mg/kg. This supports the idea that highly ordered cellulose structures near the fiber wall are resistant to hydrolysis and hinder the diffusion of glucanases. Mechanical MNFC displayed the highest aspect ratio, up to 228 for hemp. Increasing the number of homogenization cycles increased the apparent viscosity in most cases, up to 0.14 Pa·s at 100 s(−1) (1 wt.% consistency). A shear-thinning behavior, more marked for MNFC from jute and sisal, was evidenced in all cases. We conclude that, since both the raw material and the pretreatment play a major role, the unique characteristics of non-woody MNFC, either mechanical or enzymatically pretreated (low dose), make it worth considering for large-scale processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9104737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91047372022-05-14 Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining Aguado, Roberto Tarrés, Quim Pèlach, Maria Àngels Mutjé, Pere de la Fuente, Elena Sanchez-Salvador, José L. Negro, Carlos Delgado-Aguilar, Marc Nanomaterials (Basel) Article The current trends in micro-/nanofibers offer a new and unmissable chance for the recovery of cellulose from non-woody crops. This work assesses a technically feasible approach for the production of micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose (MNFC) from jute, sisal and hemp, involving refining and enzymatic hydrolysis as pretreatments. Regarding the latter, only slight enhancements of nanofibrillation, transparency and specific surface area were recorded when increasing the dose of endoglucanases from 80 to 240 mg/kg. This supports the idea that highly ordered cellulose structures near the fiber wall are resistant to hydrolysis and hinder the diffusion of glucanases. Mechanical MNFC displayed the highest aspect ratio, up to 228 for hemp. Increasing the number of homogenization cycles increased the apparent viscosity in most cases, up to 0.14 Pa·s at 100 s(−1) (1 wt.% consistency). A shear-thinning behavior, more marked for MNFC from jute and sisal, was evidenced in all cases. We conclude that, since both the raw material and the pretreatment play a major role, the unique characteristics of non-woody MNFC, either mechanical or enzymatically pretreated (low dose), make it worth considering for large-scale processes. MDPI 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9104737/ /pubmed/35564321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12091612 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Aguado, Roberto Tarrés, Quim Pèlach, Maria Àngels Mutjé, Pere de la Fuente, Elena Sanchez-Salvador, José L. Negro, Carlos Delgado-Aguilar, Marc Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining |
title | Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining |
title_full | Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining |
title_fullStr | Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining |
title_full_unstemmed | Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining |
title_short | Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining |
title_sort | micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose from annual plant-sourced fibers: comparison between enzymatic hydrolysis and mechanical refining |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12091612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aguadoroberto microandnanofibrillatedcellulosefromannualplantsourcedfiberscomparisonbetweenenzymatichydrolysisandmechanicalrefining AT tarresquim microandnanofibrillatedcellulosefromannualplantsourcedfiberscomparisonbetweenenzymatichydrolysisandmechanicalrefining AT pelachmariaangels microandnanofibrillatedcellulosefromannualplantsourcedfiberscomparisonbetweenenzymatichydrolysisandmechanicalrefining AT mutjepere microandnanofibrillatedcellulosefromannualplantsourcedfiberscomparisonbetweenenzymatichydrolysisandmechanicalrefining AT delafuenteelena microandnanofibrillatedcellulosefromannualplantsourcedfiberscomparisonbetweenenzymatichydrolysisandmechanicalrefining AT sanchezsalvadorjosel microandnanofibrillatedcellulosefromannualplantsourcedfiberscomparisonbetweenenzymatichydrolysisandmechanicalrefining AT negrocarlos microandnanofibrillatedcellulosefromannualplantsourcedfiberscomparisonbetweenenzymatichydrolysisandmechanicalrefining AT delgadoaguilarmarc microandnanofibrillatedcellulosefromannualplantsourcedfiberscomparisonbetweenenzymatichydrolysisandmechanicalrefining |