Cargando…
Rehabilitation Interventions for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review
Increasing numbers of individuals suffer from post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS), which manifests with persistent symptoms, the most prevalent being dyspnea, fatigue, and musculoskeletal, cognitive, and/or mental health impairments. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of rehabilit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095185 |
_version_ | 1784707913511600128 |
---|---|
author | Fugazzaro, Stefania Contri, Angela Esseroukh, Otmen Kaleci, Shaniko Croci, Stefania Massari, Marco Facciolongo, Nicola Cosimo Besutti, Giulia Iori, Mauro Salvarani, Carlo Costi, Stefania |
author_facet | Fugazzaro, Stefania Contri, Angela Esseroukh, Otmen Kaleci, Shaniko Croci, Stefania Massari, Marco Facciolongo, Nicola Cosimo Besutti, Giulia Iori, Mauro Salvarani, Carlo Costi, Stefania |
author_sort | Fugazzaro, Stefania |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasing numbers of individuals suffer from post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS), which manifests with persistent symptoms, the most prevalent being dyspnea, fatigue, and musculoskeletal, cognitive, and/or mental health impairments. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for individuals with PACS. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, CINHAL, Scopus, Prospero, and PEDro databases and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to November 2021. We screened 516 citations for eligibility, i.e., trials that included individuals with PACS exposed to exercise-based rehabilitation interventions. Five RCTs were included, accounting for 512 participants (aged 49.2–69.4 years, 65% males). Based on the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2.0), two RCTs had “low risk of bias”, and three were in the “some concerns” category. Three RCTs compared experimental rehabilitation interventions with no or minimal rehabilitation, while two compared two active rehabilitation interventions. Rehabilitation seemed to improve dyspnea, anxiety, and kinesiophobia. Results on pulmonary function were inconsistent, while improvements were detected in muscle strength, walking capacity, sit-to-stand performance, and quality of life. Pending further studies based on qualitatively sound designs, these first findings seem to advocate for rehabilitation interventions to lessen disability due to PACS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9104923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91049232022-05-14 Rehabilitation Interventions for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review Fugazzaro, Stefania Contri, Angela Esseroukh, Otmen Kaleci, Shaniko Croci, Stefania Massari, Marco Facciolongo, Nicola Cosimo Besutti, Giulia Iori, Mauro Salvarani, Carlo Costi, Stefania Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Increasing numbers of individuals suffer from post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS), which manifests with persistent symptoms, the most prevalent being dyspnea, fatigue, and musculoskeletal, cognitive, and/or mental health impairments. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for individuals with PACS. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, CINHAL, Scopus, Prospero, and PEDro databases and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to November 2021. We screened 516 citations for eligibility, i.e., trials that included individuals with PACS exposed to exercise-based rehabilitation interventions. Five RCTs were included, accounting for 512 participants (aged 49.2–69.4 years, 65% males). Based on the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2.0), two RCTs had “low risk of bias”, and three were in the “some concerns” category. Three RCTs compared experimental rehabilitation interventions with no or minimal rehabilitation, while two compared two active rehabilitation interventions. Rehabilitation seemed to improve dyspnea, anxiety, and kinesiophobia. Results on pulmonary function were inconsistent, while improvements were detected in muscle strength, walking capacity, sit-to-stand performance, and quality of life. Pending further studies based on qualitatively sound designs, these first findings seem to advocate for rehabilitation interventions to lessen disability due to PACS. MDPI 2022-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9104923/ /pubmed/35564579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095185 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Fugazzaro, Stefania Contri, Angela Esseroukh, Otmen Kaleci, Shaniko Croci, Stefania Massari, Marco Facciolongo, Nicola Cosimo Besutti, Giulia Iori, Mauro Salvarani, Carlo Costi, Stefania Rehabilitation Interventions for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title | Rehabilitation Interventions for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Rehabilitation Interventions for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Rehabilitation Interventions for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Rehabilitation Interventions for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Rehabilitation Interventions for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | rehabilitation interventions for post-acute covid-19 syndrome: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fugazzarostefania rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT contriangela rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT esseroukhotmen rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT kalecishaniko rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT crocistefania rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT massarimarco rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT facciolongonicolacosimo rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT besuttigiulia rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT iorimauro rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT salvaranicarlo rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview AT costistefania rehabilitationinterventionsforpostacutecovid19syndromeasystematicreview |