Cargando…

mm-Wave Radar-Based Vital Signs Monitoring and Arrhythmia Detection Using Machine Learning

A non-contact, non-invasive monitoring system to measure and estimate the heart and breathing rate of humans using a frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) mm-wave radar at 77 GHz is presented. A novel diagnostic system is proposed which extracts heartbeat phase signals from the FMCW radar (reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iyer, Srikrishna, Zhao, Leo, Mohan, Manoj Prabhakar, Jimeno, Joe, Siyal, Mohammed Yakoob, Alphones, Arokiaswami, Karim, Muhammad Faeyz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35590796
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093106
Descripción
Sumario:A non-contact, non-invasive monitoring system to measure and estimate the heart and breathing rate of humans using a frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) mm-wave radar at 77 GHz is presented. A novel diagnostic system is proposed which extracts heartbeat phase signals from the FMCW radar (reconstructed using Fourier series analysis) to test a three-layer artificial neural network model to predict the presence of arrhythmia in individuals. The effect of person orientation, distance of measurement and movement was analyzed with respect to a reference device based on statistical measures that include number of outliers, mean, mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (medAE), skewness, standard deviation (SD) and R-squared values. The individual oriented in front of the radar outperformed almost all other orientations for most distances with an expected d = 90 cm and d = 120 cm. Furthermore, it was found that the heart rate that was measured while walking and the breathing rate which was measured for a motionless individual generated results with the lowest SD and MSE. An artificial neural network (ANN) was trained using the MIT-BIH database with a training accuracy of 93.9 % and an R(2) value = 0.876. The diagnostic tool was tested on 15 subjects and achieved a mean test accuracy of 75%.