Cargando…
Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings
Accurate and rapid molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 is a crucial step to tackle the ongoing pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the real-world performance of the novel RT-PCR STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay in a large number of nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens eluted in universal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092465 |
_version_ | 1784708017432821760 |
---|---|
author | Domnich, Alexander Orsi, Andrea Trombetta, Carlo-Simone Costa, Elisabetta Guarona, Giulia Lucente, Miriana Ricucci, Valentina Bruzzone, Bianca Icardi, Giancarlo |
author_facet | Domnich, Alexander Orsi, Andrea Trombetta, Carlo-Simone Costa, Elisabetta Guarona, Giulia Lucente, Miriana Ricucci, Valentina Bruzzone, Bianca Icardi, Giancarlo |
author_sort | Domnich, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate and rapid molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 is a crucial step to tackle the ongoing pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the real-world performance of the novel RT-PCR STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay in a large number of nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens eluted in universal transport medium. The secondary objective was to evaluate the compatibility of this kit in testing NP samples eluted in an inactivated transport medium (essential for point-of-care testing) and lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens, which are commonly collected in critical care. A total of 591 samples were analyzed. Compared with the standard extraction-based RT-PCR Allplex 2019-nCoV (time-to-result of 270 min), the sensitivities of the STANDARD M10 were 100% (95% CI: 98.1–100%), 95.5% (95% CI: 91.7–97.6%), and 99.5% (95% CI: 97.2–99.9%) for ≥1 gene, the ORF1ab gene, and the E gene, respectively, while the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 98.7–100%). The diagnostic accuracy was 100% in testing both NP samples eluted in an inactivated transport medium and LRT specimens. STANDARD M10 reliably detects SARS-CoV-2 in 60 min, may be used as a POC tool, and is suitable for testing LRT specimens in the critical care setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9105343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91053432022-05-14 Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings Domnich, Alexander Orsi, Andrea Trombetta, Carlo-Simone Costa, Elisabetta Guarona, Giulia Lucente, Miriana Ricucci, Valentina Bruzzone, Bianca Icardi, Giancarlo J Clin Med Article Accurate and rapid molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 is a crucial step to tackle the ongoing pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the real-world performance of the novel RT-PCR STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay in a large number of nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens eluted in universal transport medium. The secondary objective was to evaluate the compatibility of this kit in testing NP samples eluted in an inactivated transport medium (essential for point-of-care testing) and lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens, which are commonly collected in critical care. A total of 591 samples were analyzed. Compared with the standard extraction-based RT-PCR Allplex 2019-nCoV (time-to-result of 270 min), the sensitivities of the STANDARD M10 were 100% (95% CI: 98.1–100%), 95.5% (95% CI: 91.7–97.6%), and 99.5% (95% CI: 97.2–99.9%) for ≥1 gene, the ORF1ab gene, and the E gene, respectively, while the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 98.7–100%). The diagnostic accuracy was 100% in testing both NP samples eluted in an inactivated transport medium and LRT specimens. STANDARD M10 reliably detects SARS-CoV-2 in 60 min, may be used as a POC tool, and is suitable for testing LRT specimens in the critical care setting. MDPI 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9105343/ /pubmed/35566591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092465 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Domnich, Alexander Orsi, Andrea Trombetta, Carlo-Simone Costa, Elisabetta Guarona, Giulia Lucente, Miriana Ricucci, Valentina Bruzzone, Bianca Icardi, Giancarlo Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings |
title | Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings |
title_full | Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings |
title_fullStr | Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings |
title_short | Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings |
title_sort | comparative diagnostic accuracy of the standard m10 assay for the molecular diagnosis of sars-cov-2 in the point-of-care and critical care settings |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092465 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT domnichalexander comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings AT orsiandrea comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings AT trombettacarlosimone comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings AT costaelisabetta comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings AT guaronagiulia comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings AT lucentemiriana comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings AT ricuccivalentina comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings AT bruzzonebianca comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings AT icardigiancarlo comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings |