Cargando…

Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings

Accurate and rapid molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 is a crucial step to tackle the ongoing pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the real-world performance of the novel RT-PCR STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay in a large number of nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens eluted in universal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domnich, Alexander, Orsi, Andrea, Trombetta, Carlo-Simone, Costa, Elisabetta, Guarona, Giulia, Lucente, Miriana, Ricucci, Valentina, Bruzzone, Bianca, Icardi, Giancarlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092465
_version_ 1784708017432821760
author Domnich, Alexander
Orsi, Andrea
Trombetta, Carlo-Simone
Costa, Elisabetta
Guarona, Giulia
Lucente, Miriana
Ricucci, Valentina
Bruzzone, Bianca
Icardi, Giancarlo
author_facet Domnich, Alexander
Orsi, Andrea
Trombetta, Carlo-Simone
Costa, Elisabetta
Guarona, Giulia
Lucente, Miriana
Ricucci, Valentina
Bruzzone, Bianca
Icardi, Giancarlo
author_sort Domnich, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Accurate and rapid molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 is a crucial step to tackle the ongoing pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the real-world performance of the novel RT-PCR STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay in a large number of nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens eluted in universal transport medium. The secondary objective was to evaluate the compatibility of this kit in testing NP samples eluted in an inactivated transport medium (essential for point-of-care testing) and lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens, which are commonly collected in critical care. A total of 591 samples were analyzed. Compared with the standard extraction-based RT-PCR Allplex 2019-nCoV (time-to-result of 270 min), the sensitivities of the STANDARD M10 were 100% (95% CI: 98.1–100%), 95.5% (95% CI: 91.7–97.6%), and 99.5% (95% CI: 97.2–99.9%) for ≥1 gene, the ORF1ab gene, and the E gene, respectively, while the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 98.7–100%). The diagnostic accuracy was 100% in testing both NP samples eluted in an inactivated transport medium and LRT specimens. STANDARD M10 reliably detects SARS-CoV-2 in 60 min, may be used as a POC tool, and is suitable for testing LRT specimens in the critical care setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9105343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91053432022-05-14 Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings Domnich, Alexander Orsi, Andrea Trombetta, Carlo-Simone Costa, Elisabetta Guarona, Giulia Lucente, Miriana Ricucci, Valentina Bruzzone, Bianca Icardi, Giancarlo J Clin Med Article Accurate and rapid molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 is a crucial step to tackle the ongoing pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the real-world performance of the novel RT-PCR STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay in a large number of nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens eluted in universal transport medium. The secondary objective was to evaluate the compatibility of this kit in testing NP samples eluted in an inactivated transport medium (essential for point-of-care testing) and lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens, which are commonly collected in critical care. A total of 591 samples were analyzed. Compared with the standard extraction-based RT-PCR Allplex 2019-nCoV (time-to-result of 270 min), the sensitivities of the STANDARD M10 were 100% (95% CI: 98.1–100%), 95.5% (95% CI: 91.7–97.6%), and 99.5% (95% CI: 97.2–99.9%) for ≥1 gene, the ORF1ab gene, and the E gene, respectively, while the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 98.7–100%). The diagnostic accuracy was 100% in testing both NP samples eluted in an inactivated transport medium and LRT specimens. STANDARD M10 reliably detects SARS-CoV-2 in 60 min, may be used as a POC tool, and is suitable for testing LRT specimens in the critical care setting. MDPI 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9105343/ /pubmed/35566591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092465 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Domnich, Alexander
Orsi, Andrea
Trombetta, Carlo-Simone
Costa, Elisabetta
Guarona, Giulia
Lucente, Miriana
Ricucci, Valentina
Bruzzone, Bianca
Icardi, Giancarlo
Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings
title Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings
title_full Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings
title_fullStr Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings
title_short Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings
title_sort comparative diagnostic accuracy of the standard m10 assay for the molecular diagnosis of sars-cov-2 in the point-of-care and critical care settings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092465
work_keys_str_mv AT domnichalexander comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings
AT orsiandrea comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings
AT trombettacarlosimone comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings
AT costaelisabetta comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings
AT guaronagiulia comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings
AT lucentemiriana comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings
AT ricuccivalentina comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings
AT bruzzonebianca comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings
AT icardigiancarlo comparativediagnosticaccuracyofthestandardm10assayforthemoleculardiagnosisofsarscov2inthepointofcareandcriticalcaresettings