Cargando…

Estimating Running Ground Reaction Forces from Plantar Pressure during Graded Running

Ground reaction forces (GRFs) describe how runners interact with their surroundings and provide the basis for computing inverse dynamics. Wearable technology can predict time−continuous GRFs during walking and running; however, the majority of GRF predictions examine level ground locomotion. The pur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Honert, Eric C., Hoitz, Fabian, Blades, Sam, Nigg, Sandro R., Nigg, Benno M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093338
_version_ 1784708110361821184
author Honert, Eric C.
Hoitz, Fabian
Blades, Sam
Nigg, Sandro R.
Nigg, Benno M.
author_facet Honert, Eric C.
Hoitz, Fabian
Blades, Sam
Nigg, Sandro R.
Nigg, Benno M.
author_sort Honert, Eric C.
collection PubMed
description Ground reaction forces (GRFs) describe how runners interact with their surroundings and provide the basis for computing inverse dynamics. Wearable technology can predict time−continuous GRFs during walking and running; however, the majority of GRF predictions examine level ground locomotion. The purpose of this manuscript was to predict vertical and anterior–posterior GRFs across different speeds and slopes. Eighteen recreationally active subjects ran on an instrumented treadmill while we collected GRFs and plantar pressure. Subjects ran on level ground at 2.6, 3.0, 3.4, and 3.8 m/s, six degrees inclined at 2.6, 2.8, and 3.0 m/s, and six degrees declined at 2.6, 2.8, 3.0, and 3.4 m/s. We estimated GRFs using a set of linear models and a recurrent neural network, which used speed, slope, and plantar pressure as inputs. We also tested eliminating speed and slope as inputs. The recurrent neural network outperformed the linear model across all conditions, especially with the prediction of anterior–posterior GRFs. Eliminating speed and slope as model inputs had little effect on performance. We also demonstrate that subject−specific model training can reduce errors from 8% to 3%. With such low errors, researchers can use these wearable−based GRFs to understand running performance or injuries in real−world settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9105722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91057222022-05-14 Estimating Running Ground Reaction Forces from Plantar Pressure during Graded Running Honert, Eric C. Hoitz, Fabian Blades, Sam Nigg, Sandro R. Nigg, Benno M. Sensors (Basel) Article Ground reaction forces (GRFs) describe how runners interact with their surroundings and provide the basis for computing inverse dynamics. Wearable technology can predict time−continuous GRFs during walking and running; however, the majority of GRF predictions examine level ground locomotion. The purpose of this manuscript was to predict vertical and anterior–posterior GRFs across different speeds and slopes. Eighteen recreationally active subjects ran on an instrumented treadmill while we collected GRFs and plantar pressure. Subjects ran on level ground at 2.6, 3.0, 3.4, and 3.8 m/s, six degrees inclined at 2.6, 2.8, and 3.0 m/s, and six degrees declined at 2.6, 2.8, 3.0, and 3.4 m/s. We estimated GRFs using a set of linear models and a recurrent neural network, which used speed, slope, and plantar pressure as inputs. We also tested eliminating speed and slope as inputs. The recurrent neural network outperformed the linear model across all conditions, especially with the prediction of anterior–posterior GRFs. Eliminating speed and slope as model inputs had little effect on performance. We also demonstrate that subject−specific model training can reduce errors from 8% to 3%. With such low errors, researchers can use these wearable−based GRFs to understand running performance or injuries in real−world settings. MDPI 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9105722/ /pubmed/35591027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093338 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Honert, Eric C.
Hoitz, Fabian
Blades, Sam
Nigg, Sandro R.
Nigg, Benno M.
Estimating Running Ground Reaction Forces from Plantar Pressure during Graded Running
title Estimating Running Ground Reaction Forces from Plantar Pressure during Graded Running
title_full Estimating Running Ground Reaction Forces from Plantar Pressure during Graded Running
title_fullStr Estimating Running Ground Reaction Forces from Plantar Pressure during Graded Running
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Running Ground Reaction Forces from Plantar Pressure during Graded Running
title_short Estimating Running Ground Reaction Forces from Plantar Pressure during Graded Running
title_sort estimating running ground reaction forces from plantar pressure during graded running
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093338
work_keys_str_mv AT honertericc estimatingrunninggroundreactionforcesfromplantarpressureduringgradedrunning
AT hoitzfabian estimatingrunninggroundreactionforcesfromplantarpressureduringgradedrunning
AT bladessam estimatingrunninggroundreactionforcesfromplantarpressureduringgradedrunning
AT niggsandror estimatingrunninggroundreactionforcesfromplantarpressureduringgradedrunning
AT niggbennom estimatingrunninggroundreactionforcesfromplantarpressureduringgradedrunning