Cargando…

Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neuroimaging technique that measures the magnetic fields of the brain outside of the head. In the past, the most suitable magnetometer for MEG was the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), but in recent years, a new type has also been used, the optica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marhl, Urban, Sander, Tilmann, Jazbinšek, Vojko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35590874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093184
_version_ 1784708111371599872
author Marhl, Urban
Sander, Tilmann
Jazbinšek, Vojko
author_facet Marhl, Urban
Sander, Tilmann
Jazbinšek, Vojko
author_sort Marhl, Urban
collection PubMed
description Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neuroimaging technique that measures the magnetic fields of the brain outside of the head. In the past, the most suitable magnetometer for MEG was the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), but in recent years, a new type has also been used, the optically pumped magnetometer (OPM). OPMs can be configured to measure multiple directions of magnetic field simultaneously. This work explored whether combining multiple directions of the magnetic field lowers the source localization error of brain sources under various conditions of noise. We simulated dipolar-like sources for multiple configurations of both SQUID- and OPM-MEG systems. To test the performance of a given layout, we calculated the average signal-to-noise ratio and the root mean square of the simulated magnetic field; furthermore, we evaluated the performance of the dipole fit. The results showed that the field direction normal to the scalp yields a higher signal-to-noise ratio and that ambient noise has a much lower impact on its localization error; therefore, this is the optimal choice for source localization when only one direction of magnetic field can be measured. For a low number of OPMs, combining multiple field directions greatly improves the source localization results. Lastly, we showed that MEG sensors that can be placed closer to the brain are more suitable for localizing deeper sources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9105726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91057262022-05-14 Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components Marhl, Urban Sander, Tilmann Jazbinšek, Vojko Sensors (Basel) Article Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neuroimaging technique that measures the magnetic fields of the brain outside of the head. In the past, the most suitable magnetometer for MEG was the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), but in recent years, a new type has also been used, the optically pumped magnetometer (OPM). OPMs can be configured to measure multiple directions of magnetic field simultaneously. This work explored whether combining multiple directions of the magnetic field lowers the source localization error of brain sources under various conditions of noise. We simulated dipolar-like sources for multiple configurations of both SQUID- and OPM-MEG systems. To test the performance of a given layout, we calculated the average signal-to-noise ratio and the root mean square of the simulated magnetic field; furthermore, we evaluated the performance of the dipole fit. The results showed that the field direction normal to the scalp yields a higher signal-to-noise ratio and that ambient noise has a much lower impact on its localization error; therefore, this is the optimal choice for source localization when only one direction of magnetic field can be measured. For a low number of OPMs, combining multiple field directions greatly improves the source localization results. Lastly, we showed that MEG sensors that can be placed closer to the brain are more suitable for localizing deeper sources. MDPI 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9105726/ /pubmed/35590874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093184 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Marhl, Urban
Sander, Tilmann
Jazbinšek, Vojko
Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_full Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_fullStr Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_full_unstemmed Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_short Simulation Study of Different OPM-MEG Measurement Components
title_sort simulation study of different opm-meg measurement components
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35590874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093184
work_keys_str_mv AT marhlurban simulationstudyofdifferentopmmegmeasurementcomponents
AT sandertilmann simulationstudyofdifferentopmmegmeasurementcomponents
AT jazbinsekvojko simulationstudyofdifferentopmmegmeasurementcomponents