Cargando…

What Mechanisms Do Financial Marketization and China’s Fiscal Decentralization Have on Regional Energy Intensity? Evidence Based on Spatial Spillover and Panel Threshold Effects Perspectives

Energy efficiency and energy intensity are gradually gaining attention, and it is now an important proposition to reconcile financial marketization, fiscal decentralization, and regional energy intensity. Using Chinese mainland provincial panel data (except Tibet) from 2007 to 2019, this study appli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Junbai, Lv, Kun, Yu, Shurong, Fu, Dian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095759
_version_ 1784708120544542720
author Pan, Junbai
Lv, Kun
Yu, Shurong
Fu, Dian
author_facet Pan, Junbai
Lv, Kun
Yu, Shurong
Fu, Dian
author_sort Pan, Junbai
collection PubMed
description Energy efficiency and energy intensity are gradually gaining attention, and it is now an important proposition to reconcile financial marketization, fiscal decentralization, and regional energy intensity. Using Chinese mainland provincial panel data (except Tibet) from 2007 to 2019, this study applied the dynamic panel system generalized method of moments model, the spatial Durbin model, and the panel threshold model to investigate the mechanisms of financial marketization and fiscal decentralization on regional energy intensity. The study found that financial marketization can play a significant role in suppressing regional energy intensity, while fiscal decentralization promotes energy intensity. Meanwhile, financial marketization in one province can have a negative spatial transmission effect on energy intensity in other provinces, while fiscal decentralization in one province has a negative spatial spillover effect on energy intensity in other provinces. Based on the analysis of the moderating and threshold effects, financial marketization not only moderates the negative externality of fiscal decentralization, making it inhibit energy intensity in the opposite direction, but also gradually increases the moderating effect on fiscal decentralization as the degree of financial marketization increases, showing a nonlinear inhibiting effect on regional energy intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9105769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91057692022-05-14 What Mechanisms Do Financial Marketization and China’s Fiscal Decentralization Have on Regional Energy Intensity? Evidence Based on Spatial Spillover and Panel Threshold Effects Perspectives Pan, Junbai Lv, Kun Yu, Shurong Fu, Dian Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Energy efficiency and energy intensity are gradually gaining attention, and it is now an important proposition to reconcile financial marketization, fiscal decentralization, and regional energy intensity. Using Chinese mainland provincial panel data (except Tibet) from 2007 to 2019, this study applied the dynamic panel system generalized method of moments model, the spatial Durbin model, and the panel threshold model to investigate the mechanisms of financial marketization and fiscal decentralization on regional energy intensity. The study found that financial marketization can play a significant role in suppressing regional energy intensity, while fiscal decentralization promotes energy intensity. Meanwhile, financial marketization in one province can have a negative spatial transmission effect on energy intensity in other provinces, while fiscal decentralization in one province has a negative spatial spillover effect on energy intensity in other provinces. Based on the analysis of the moderating and threshold effects, financial marketization not only moderates the negative externality of fiscal decentralization, making it inhibit energy intensity in the opposite direction, but also gradually increases the moderating effect on fiscal decentralization as the degree of financial marketization increases, showing a nonlinear inhibiting effect on regional energy intensity. MDPI 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9105769/ /pubmed/35565151 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095759 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pan, Junbai
Lv, Kun
Yu, Shurong
Fu, Dian
What Mechanisms Do Financial Marketization and China’s Fiscal Decentralization Have on Regional Energy Intensity? Evidence Based on Spatial Spillover and Panel Threshold Effects Perspectives
title What Mechanisms Do Financial Marketization and China’s Fiscal Decentralization Have on Regional Energy Intensity? Evidence Based on Spatial Spillover and Panel Threshold Effects Perspectives
title_full What Mechanisms Do Financial Marketization and China’s Fiscal Decentralization Have on Regional Energy Intensity? Evidence Based on Spatial Spillover and Panel Threshold Effects Perspectives
title_fullStr What Mechanisms Do Financial Marketization and China’s Fiscal Decentralization Have on Regional Energy Intensity? Evidence Based on Spatial Spillover and Panel Threshold Effects Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed What Mechanisms Do Financial Marketization and China’s Fiscal Decentralization Have on Regional Energy Intensity? Evidence Based on Spatial Spillover and Panel Threshold Effects Perspectives
title_short What Mechanisms Do Financial Marketization and China’s Fiscal Decentralization Have on Regional Energy Intensity? Evidence Based on Spatial Spillover and Panel Threshold Effects Perspectives
title_sort what mechanisms do financial marketization and china’s fiscal decentralization have on regional energy intensity? evidence based on spatial spillover and panel threshold effects perspectives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095759
work_keys_str_mv AT panjunbai whatmechanismsdofinancialmarketizationandchinasfiscaldecentralizationhaveonregionalenergyintensityevidencebasedonspatialspilloverandpanelthresholdeffectsperspectives
AT lvkun whatmechanismsdofinancialmarketizationandchinasfiscaldecentralizationhaveonregionalenergyintensityevidencebasedonspatialspilloverandpanelthresholdeffectsperspectives
AT yushurong whatmechanismsdofinancialmarketizationandchinasfiscaldecentralizationhaveonregionalenergyintensityevidencebasedonspatialspilloverandpanelthresholdeffectsperspectives
AT fudian whatmechanismsdofinancialmarketizationandchinasfiscaldecentralizationhaveonregionalenergyintensityevidencebasedonspatialspilloverandpanelthresholdeffectsperspectives