Cargando…

Comprehensive Chemical Dust Suppressant Performance Evaluation and Optimization Method

Chemical dust suppression is an effective dust control technology. A dust suppressant component evaluation method that facilitates a complete selection of safe, efficient, and economical chemical materials has not been explored. Considering dust suppression performance, environmental safety, and cos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ming, Wang, Rujia, Li, Gang, Song, Xinzhu, Yang, Huaizhen, Lai, Huinan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095617
_version_ 1784708144261234688
author Li, Ming
Wang, Rujia
Li, Gang
Song, Xinzhu
Yang, Huaizhen
Lai, Huinan
author_facet Li, Ming
Wang, Rujia
Li, Gang
Song, Xinzhu
Yang, Huaizhen
Lai, Huinan
author_sort Li, Ming
collection PubMed
description Chemical dust suppression is an effective dust control technology. A dust suppressant component evaluation method that facilitates a complete selection of safe, efficient, and economical chemical materials has not been explored. Considering dust suppression performance, environmental safety, and cost-effectiveness of chemical dust suppressant technology, this study constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system of chemical dust suppressant performance, including the wetting performance, hygroscopic performance, bonding performance, annual cost per unit area, pH value of dust suppression solution, chemical toxicity, and chemical corrosion. Among them, the index characterizing the wetting performance of the solution is the sedimentation wetting time, which is determined by the dust sedimentation experiment; the index characterizing the hygroscopic performance of the solution is the evaporation stability time, which is determined by the evaporation experiment of the solution on the dust surface; the index to characterize the bonding performance of the solution is the surface wind erosion rate, which is determined by the wind erosion experiment of the solution on the dust surface; the toxicity of the solution is evaluated by the LD50 of the solution; the index to characterize the corrosion performance of the solution is the Q235 monthly steel corrosion rate, which is determined by the Q235 steel corrosion test. Corresponding evaluation parameters are determined including sedimentation wetting time, evaporation stabilization time, surface wind erosion rate; annual average use cost per unit area; solution pH value, chemical acute toxicity classification, monthly corrosion rate of Q235 steel, and corresponding standard test methods are also provided. In order to evaluate the comparability of the results, according to the specific requirements of the evaluation index system and the distribution characteristics of the measurement data, the data of each evaluation and detection index are standardized by linear transformation, range transformation and other methods, so that the obtained results are comparable. Considering the differences in the actual performance requirements of dust suppressants in different usage scenarios, the weights of evaluation indicators at all levels can be set independently and flexible. The experimental test data obtained through the example shows that: among the four chemicals selected to participate in the experiment, the comprehensive dust suppression performance score of Triton X-100 solution is in the poor-grade category. The comprehensive dust suppression performances of calcium chloride solution, water, and polyacrylamide solution scored high in the average-grade category. The comprehensive evaluation process is logically correct, and the results are consistent with the phenomena observed in the experiment, consistent with conventional understanding, and have strong credibility. This method can provide a standardized evaluation technique and test process for the comprehensive performance evaluation and comparison of chemical materials and dust suppressants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9105875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91058752022-05-14 Comprehensive Chemical Dust Suppressant Performance Evaluation and Optimization Method Li, Ming Wang, Rujia Li, Gang Song, Xinzhu Yang, Huaizhen Lai, Huinan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Chemical dust suppression is an effective dust control technology. A dust suppressant component evaluation method that facilitates a complete selection of safe, efficient, and economical chemical materials has not been explored. Considering dust suppression performance, environmental safety, and cost-effectiveness of chemical dust suppressant technology, this study constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system of chemical dust suppressant performance, including the wetting performance, hygroscopic performance, bonding performance, annual cost per unit area, pH value of dust suppression solution, chemical toxicity, and chemical corrosion. Among them, the index characterizing the wetting performance of the solution is the sedimentation wetting time, which is determined by the dust sedimentation experiment; the index characterizing the hygroscopic performance of the solution is the evaporation stability time, which is determined by the evaporation experiment of the solution on the dust surface; the index to characterize the bonding performance of the solution is the surface wind erosion rate, which is determined by the wind erosion experiment of the solution on the dust surface; the toxicity of the solution is evaluated by the LD50 of the solution; the index to characterize the corrosion performance of the solution is the Q235 monthly steel corrosion rate, which is determined by the Q235 steel corrosion test. Corresponding evaluation parameters are determined including sedimentation wetting time, evaporation stabilization time, surface wind erosion rate; annual average use cost per unit area; solution pH value, chemical acute toxicity classification, monthly corrosion rate of Q235 steel, and corresponding standard test methods are also provided. In order to evaluate the comparability of the results, according to the specific requirements of the evaluation index system and the distribution characteristics of the measurement data, the data of each evaluation and detection index are standardized by linear transformation, range transformation and other methods, so that the obtained results are comparable. Considering the differences in the actual performance requirements of dust suppressants in different usage scenarios, the weights of evaluation indicators at all levels can be set independently and flexible. The experimental test data obtained through the example shows that: among the four chemicals selected to participate in the experiment, the comprehensive dust suppression performance score of Triton X-100 solution is in the poor-grade category. The comprehensive dust suppression performances of calcium chloride solution, water, and polyacrylamide solution scored high in the average-grade category. The comprehensive evaluation process is logically correct, and the results are consistent with the phenomena observed in the experiment, consistent with conventional understanding, and have strong credibility. This method can provide a standardized evaluation technique and test process for the comprehensive performance evaluation and comparison of chemical materials and dust suppressants. MDPI 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9105875/ /pubmed/35565025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095617 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Ming
Wang, Rujia
Li, Gang
Song, Xinzhu
Yang, Huaizhen
Lai, Huinan
Comprehensive Chemical Dust Suppressant Performance Evaluation and Optimization Method
title Comprehensive Chemical Dust Suppressant Performance Evaluation and Optimization Method
title_full Comprehensive Chemical Dust Suppressant Performance Evaluation and Optimization Method
title_fullStr Comprehensive Chemical Dust Suppressant Performance Evaluation and Optimization Method
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Chemical Dust Suppressant Performance Evaluation and Optimization Method
title_short Comprehensive Chemical Dust Suppressant Performance Evaluation and Optimization Method
title_sort comprehensive chemical dust suppressant performance evaluation and optimization method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095617
work_keys_str_mv AT liming comprehensivechemicaldustsuppressantperformanceevaluationandoptimizationmethod
AT wangrujia comprehensivechemicaldustsuppressantperformanceevaluationandoptimizationmethod
AT ligang comprehensivechemicaldustsuppressantperformanceevaluationandoptimizationmethod
AT songxinzhu comprehensivechemicaldustsuppressantperformanceevaluationandoptimizationmethod
AT yanghuaizhen comprehensivechemicaldustsuppressantperformanceevaluationandoptimizationmethod
AT laihuinan comprehensivechemicaldustsuppressantperformanceevaluationandoptimizationmethod