Cargando…

Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics

The necessity for resource-efficient manufacturing technologies requires new developments within the field of plastic processing. Lightweight design using wood fibers as sustainable reinforcement for thermoplastics might be one solution. The processing of wood fibers requires special attention to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiedl, Sebastian, Karlinger, Peter, Schemme, Michael, List, Manuela, Ruckdäschel, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093393
_version_ 1784708147324125184
author Wiedl, Sebastian
Karlinger, Peter
Schemme, Michael
List, Manuela
Ruckdäschel, Holger
author_facet Wiedl, Sebastian
Karlinger, Peter
Schemme, Michael
List, Manuela
Ruckdäschel, Holger
author_sort Wiedl, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description The necessity for resource-efficient manufacturing technologies requires new developments within the field of plastic processing. Lightweight design using wood fibers as sustainable reinforcement for thermoplastics might be one solution. The processing of wood fibers requires special attention to the applied thermal load. Even at low processing temperatures, the influence of the dwell time, temperature and shear force is critical to ensure the structural integrity of fibers. Therefore, this article compares different compounding rates for polypropylene with wood fibers and highlights their effects on the olfactory, visual and mechanical properties of the injection-molded part. The study compares one-step processing, using an injection-molding compounder (IMC), with two-step processing, using a twin-scew-extruder (TSE), a heating/cooling mixer (HCM) and an internal mixer (IM) with subsequent injection molding. Although the highest fiber length was achieved by using the IMC, the best mechanical properties were achieved by the HCM and IM. The measured oxidation induction time and volatile organic compound content indicate that the lowest amount of thermal damage occurred when using the HCM and IM. The advantage of one-time melting was evened out by the dwell time. The reinforcement of thermoplastics by wood fibers depends more strongly on the structural integrity of the fibers compared to their length and homogeneity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9105887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91058872022-05-14 Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics Wiedl, Sebastian Karlinger, Peter Schemme, Michael List, Manuela Ruckdäschel, Holger Materials (Basel) Article The necessity for resource-efficient manufacturing technologies requires new developments within the field of plastic processing. Lightweight design using wood fibers as sustainable reinforcement for thermoplastics might be one solution. The processing of wood fibers requires special attention to the applied thermal load. Even at low processing temperatures, the influence of the dwell time, temperature and shear force is critical to ensure the structural integrity of fibers. Therefore, this article compares different compounding rates for polypropylene with wood fibers and highlights their effects on the olfactory, visual and mechanical properties of the injection-molded part. The study compares one-step processing, using an injection-molding compounder (IMC), with two-step processing, using a twin-scew-extruder (TSE), a heating/cooling mixer (HCM) and an internal mixer (IM) with subsequent injection molding. Although the highest fiber length was achieved by using the IMC, the best mechanical properties were achieved by the HCM and IM. The measured oxidation induction time and volatile organic compound content indicate that the lowest amount of thermal damage occurred when using the HCM and IM. The advantage of one-time melting was evened out by the dwell time. The reinforcement of thermoplastics by wood fibers depends more strongly on the structural integrity of the fibers compared to their length and homogeneity. MDPI 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9105887/ /pubmed/35591727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093393 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wiedl, Sebastian
Karlinger, Peter
Schemme, Michael
List, Manuela
Ruckdäschel, Holger
Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics
title Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics
title_full Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics
title_fullStr Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics
title_short Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics
title_sort comparison of melting processes for wpc and the resulting differences in thermal damage, emissions and mechanics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093393
work_keys_str_mv AT wiedlsebastian comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics
AT karlingerpeter comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics
AT schemmemichael comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics
AT listmanuela comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics
AT ruckdaschelholger comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics