Cargando…
Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics
The necessity for resource-efficient manufacturing technologies requires new developments within the field of plastic processing. Lightweight design using wood fibers as sustainable reinforcement for thermoplastics might be one solution. The processing of wood fibers requires special attention to th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093393 |
_version_ | 1784708147324125184 |
---|---|
author | Wiedl, Sebastian Karlinger, Peter Schemme, Michael List, Manuela Ruckdäschel, Holger |
author_facet | Wiedl, Sebastian Karlinger, Peter Schemme, Michael List, Manuela Ruckdäschel, Holger |
author_sort | Wiedl, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The necessity for resource-efficient manufacturing technologies requires new developments within the field of plastic processing. Lightweight design using wood fibers as sustainable reinforcement for thermoplastics might be one solution. The processing of wood fibers requires special attention to the applied thermal load. Even at low processing temperatures, the influence of the dwell time, temperature and shear force is critical to ensure the structural integrity of fibers. Therefore, this article compares different compounding rates for polypropylene with wood fibers and highlights their effects on the olfactory, visual and mechanical properties of the injection-molded part. The study compares one-step processing, using an injection-molding compounder (IMC), with two-step processing, using a twin-scew-extruder (TSE), a heating/cooling mixer (HCM) and an internal mixer (IM) with subsequent injection molding. Although the highest fiber length was achieved by using the IMC, the best mechanical properties were achieved by the HCM and IM. The measured oxidation induction time and volatile organic compound content indicate that the lowest amount of thermal damage occurred when using the HCM and IM. The advantage of one-time melting was evened out by the dwell time. The reinforcement of thermoplastics by wood fibers depends more strongly on the structural integrity of the fibers compared to their length and homogeneity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9105887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91058872022-05-14 Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics Wiedl, Sebastian Karlinger, Peter Schemme, Michael List, Manuela Ruckdäschel, Holger Materials (Basel) Article The necessity for resource-efficient manufacturing technologies requires new developments within the field of plastic processing. Lightweight design using wood fibers as sustainable reinforcement for thermoplastics might be one solution. The processing of wood fibers requires special attention to the applied thermal load. Even at low processing temperatures, the influence of the dwell time, temperature and shear force is critical to ensure the structural integrity of fibers. Therefore, this article compares different compounding rates for polypropylene with wood fibers and highlights their effects on the olfactory, visual and mechanical properties of the injection-molded part. The study compares one-step processing, using an injection-molding compounder (IMC), with two-step processing, using a twin-scew-extruder (TSE), a heating/cooling mixer (HCM) and an internal mixer (IM) with subsequent injection molding. Although the highest fiber length was achieved by using the IMC, the best mechanical properties were achieved by the HCM and IM. The measured oxidation induction time and volatile organic compound content indicate that the lowest amount of thermal damage occurred when using the HCM and IM. The advantage of one-time melting was evened out by the dwell time. The reinforcement of thermoplastics by wood fibers depends more strongly on the structural integrity of the fibers compared to their length and homogeneity. MDPI 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9105887/ /pubmed/35591727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093393 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wiedl, Sebastian Karlinger, Peter Schemme, Michael List, Manuela Ruckdäschel, Holger Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics |
title | Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics |
title_full | Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics |
title_short | Comparison of Melting Processes for WPC and the Resulting Differences in Thermal Damage, Emissions and Mechanics |
title_sort | comparison of melting processes for wpc and the resulting differences in thermal damage, emissions and mechanics |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9105887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093393 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiedlsebastian comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics AT karlingerpeter comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics AT schemmemichael comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics AT listmanuela comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics AT ruckdaschelholger comparisonofmeltingprocessesforwpcandtheresultingdifferencesinthermaldamageemissionsandmechanics |