Cargando…

Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the anesthetic technique may influence long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. However, the association between the anesthetic technique and long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miao, Lingju, Lv, Xiang, Huang, Can, Li, Ping, Sun, Yu, Jiang, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35559987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268473
_version_ 1784708221993222144
author Miao, Lingju
Lv, Xiang
Huang, Can
Li, Ping
Sun, Yu
Jiang, Hong
author_facet Miao, Lingju
Lv, Xiang
Huang, Can
Li, Ping
Sun, Yu
Jiang, Hong
author_sort Miao, Lingju
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the anesthetic technique may influence long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. However, the association between the anesthetic technique and long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to address this gap. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent elective oral cancer surgery between January 2014 and December 2015. The patients were grouped based on the anesthesia maintenance: either propofol or sevoflurane. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was performed to deal with the potential confounding effects of baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to compare hazard ratios (HRs) and identify the risk factors for death and recurrence. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and survival curves were constructed from the date of surgery to death. RESULTS: In total, 1347 patients were eligible for analysis, with 343 and 1004 patients in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 302 patients remained in each group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated the 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates of 59.3% and 56.0% and 62.7% and 56.5% in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival or recurrence-free survival between the groups. The multivariate Cox analysis verified this conclusion with HRs of 1.10 and 1.11 for overall survival and recurrence-free survival, respectively, in the sevoflurane group. Older age, advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III were associated with poor overall survival. Patients with advanced TNM stage and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma had a higher recurrence risk than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: The overall and recurrence-free survival rates were similar between propofol-based intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane volatile anesthesia in patients who underwent oral cancer surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9106182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91061822022-05-14 Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study Miao, Lingju Lv, Xiang Huang, Can Li, Ping Sun, Yu Jiang, Hong PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the anesthetic technique may influence long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. However, the association between the anesthetic technique and long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to address this gap. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent elective oral cancer surgery between January 2014 and December 2015. The patients were grouped based on the anesthesia maintenance: either propofol or sevoflurane. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was performed to deal with the potential confounding effects of baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to compare hazard ratios (HRs) and identify the risk factors for death and recurrence. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and survival curves were constructed from the date of surgery to death. RESULTS: In total, 1347 patients were eligible for analysis, with 343 and 1004 patients in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 302 patients remained in each group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated the 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates of 59.3% and 56.0% and 62.7% and 56.5% in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival or recurrence-free survival between the groups. The multivariate Cox analysis verified this conclusion with HRs of 1.10 and 1.11 for overall survival and recurrence-free survival, respectively, in the sevoflurane group. Older age, advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III were associated with poor overall survival. Patients with advanced TNM stage and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma had a higher recurrence risk than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: The overall and recurrence-free survival rates were similar between propofol-based intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane volatile anesthesia in patients who underwent oral cancer surgery. Public Library of Science 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9106182/ /pubmed/35559987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268473 Text en © 2022 Miao et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miao, Lingju
Lv, Xiang
Huang, Can
Li, Ping
Sun, Yu
Jiang, Hong
Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
title Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35559987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268473
work_keys_str_mv AT miaolingju longtermoncologicaloutcomesafteroralcancersurgeryusingpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaversussevofluranebasedinhalationanesthesiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lvxiang longtermoncologicaloutcomesafteroralcancersurgeryusingpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaversussevofluranebasedinhalationanesthesiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huangcan longtermoncologicaloutcomesafteroralcancersurgeryusingpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaversussevofluranebasedinhalationanesthesiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liping longtermoncologicaloutcomesafteroralcancersurgeryusingpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaversussevofluranebasedinhalationanesthesiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sunyu longtermoncologicaloutcomesafteroralcancersurgeryusingpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaversussevofluranebasedinhalationanesthesiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jianghong longtermoncologicaloutcomesafteroralcancersurgeryusingpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaversussevofluranebasedinhalationanesthesiaaretrospectivecohortstudy