Cargando…
The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity
The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) occurs when a rapidly presented visual stimulus is accompanied by two auditory stimuli, creating the illusory percept of two visual stimuli. While much research has focused on how the temporal proximity of the audiovisual stimuli impacts susceptibility to the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35562629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02493-4 |
_version_ | 1784708256789168128 |
---|---|
author | Gavin, Niall Hirst, Rebecca J. McGovern, David P. |
author_facet | Gavin, Niall Hirst, Rebecca J. McGovern, David P. |
author_sort | Gavin, Niall |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) occurs when a rapidly presented visual stimulus is accompanied by two auditory stimuli, creating the illusory percept of two visual stimuli. While much research has focused on how the temporal proximity of the audiovisual stimuli impacts susceptibility to the illusion, comparatively less research has focused on the impact of spatial manipulations. Here, we aimed to assess whether manipulating the eccentricity of visual flash stimuli altered the properties of the temporal binding window associated with the SIFI. Twenty participants were required to report whether they perceived one or two flashes that were concurrently presented with one or two beeps. Visual stimuli were presented at one of four different retinal eccentricities (2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 degrees below fixation) and audiovisual stimuli were separated by one of eight stimulus-onset asynchronies. In keeping with previous findings, increasing stimulus-onset asynchrony between the auditory and visual stimuli led to a marked decrease in susceptibility to the illusion allowing us to estimate the width and amplitude of the temporal binding window. However, varying the eccentricity of the visual stimulus had no effect on either the width or the peak amplitude of the temporal binding window, with a similar pattern of results observed for both the “fission” and “fusion” variants of the illusion. Thus, spatial manipulations of the audiovisual stimuli used to elicit the SIFI appear to have a weaker effect on the integration of sensory signals than temporal manipulations, a finding which has implications for neuroanatomical models of multisensory integration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-022-02493-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9106326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91063262022-05-16 The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity Gavin, Niall Hirst, Rebecca J. McGovern, David P. Atten Percept Psychophys Article The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) occurs when a rapidly presented visual stimulus is accompanied by two auditory stimuli, creating the illusory percept of two visual stimuli. While much research has focused on how the temporal proximity of the audiovisual stimuli impacts susceptibility to the illusion, comparatively less research has focused on the impact of spatial manipulations. Here, we aimed to assess whether manipulating the eccentricity of visual flash stimuli altered the properties of the temporal binding window associated with the SIFI. Twenty participants were required to report whether they perceived one or two flashes that were concurrently presented with one or two beeps. Visual stimuli were presented at one of four different retinal eccentricities (2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 degrees below fixation) and audiovisual stimuli were separated by one of eight stimulus-onset asynchronies. In keeping with previous findings, increasing stimulus-onset asynchrony between the auditory and visual stimuli led to a marked decrease in susceptibility to the illusion allowing us to estimate the width and amplitude of the temporal binding window. However, varying the eccentricity of the visual stimulus had no effect on either the width or the peak amplitude of the temporal binding window, with a similar pattern of results observed for both the “fission” and “fusion” variants of the illusion. Thus, spatial manipulations of the audiovisual stimuli used to elicit the SIFI appear to have a weaker effect on the integration of sensory signals than temporal manipulations, a finding which has implications for neuroanatomical models of multisensory integration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-022-02493-4. Springer US 2022-05-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9106326/ /pubmed/35562629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02493-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Gavin, Niall Hirst, Rebecca J. McGovern, David P. The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity |
title | The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity |
title_full | The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity |
title_fullStr | The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity |
title_full_unstemmed | The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity |
title_short | The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity |
title_sort | magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35562629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02493-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gavinniall themagnitudeofthesoundinducedflashillusiondoesnotincreasemonotonicallyasafunctionofvisualstimuluseccentricity AT hirstrebeccaj themagnitudeofthesoundinducedflashillusiondoesnotincreasemonotonicallyasafunctionofvisualstimuluseccentricity AT mcgoverndavidp themagnitudeofthesoundinducedflashillusiondoesnotincreasemonotonicallyasafunctionofvisualstimuluseccentricity AT gavinniall magnitudeofthesoundinducedflashillusiondoesnotincreasemonotonicallyasafunctionofvisualstimuluseccentricity AT hirstrebeccaj magnitudeofthesoundinducedflashillusiondoesnotincreasemonotonicallyasafunctionofvisualstimuluseccentricity AT mcgoverndavidp magnitudeofthesoundinducedflashillusiondoesnotincreasemonotonicallyasafunctionofvisualstimuluseccentricity |