Cargando…

Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists

Background and study aims  Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a well-accepted quality indicator of screening colonoscopy. In recent years, the added value of artificial intelligence (AI) has been demonstrated in terms of ADR and adenoma miss rate (AMR). To date, there are no studies evaluating the impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biscaglia, Giuseppe, Cocomazzi, Francesco, Gentile, Marco, Loconte, Ilaria, Mileti, Alessia, Paolillo, Rosa, Marra, Antonella, Castellana, Stefano, Mazza, Tommaso, Di Leo, Alfredo, Perri, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1783-9678
_version_ 1784708281759956992
author Biscaglia, Giuseppe
Cocomazzi, Francesco
Gentile, Marco
Loconte, Ilaria
Mileti, Alessia
Paolillo, Rosa
Marra, Antonella
Castellana, Stefano
Mazza, Tommaso
Di Leo, Alfredo
Perri, Francesco
author_facet Biscaglia, Giuseppe
Cocomazzi, Francesco
Gentile, Marco
Loconte, Ilaria
Mileti, Alessia
Paolillo, Rosa
Marra, Antonella
Castellana, Stefano
Mazza, Tommaso
Di Leo, Alfredo
Perri, Francesco
author_sort Biscaglia, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a well-accepted quality indicator of screening colonoscopy. In recent years, the added value of artificial intelligence (AI) has been demonstrated in terms of ADR and adenoma miss rate (AMR). To date, there are no studies evaluating the impact of AI on the performance of trainee endoscopists (TEs). This study aimed to assess whether AI might eliminate any difference in ADR or AMR between TEs and experienced endoscopists (EEs). Patients and methods  We performed a prospective observational study in 45 subjects referred for screening colonoscopy. A same-day tandem examination was carried out for each patient by a TE with the AI assistance and subsequently by an EE unaware of the lesions detected by the TE. Besides ADR and AMR, we also calculated for each subgroup of endoscopists the adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), polyp detection rate (PDR), polyp per colonoscopy (PPC) and polyp miss rate (PMR). Subgroup analyses according to size, morphology, and site were also performed. Results  ADR, APC, PDR, and PPC of AI-supported TEs were 38 %, 0.93, 62 %, 1.93, respectively. The corresponding parameters for EEs were 40 %, 1.07, 58 %, 2.22. No significant difference was found for each analysis between the two groups ( P  > 0.05). AMR and PMR for AI-assisted TEs were 12.5 % and 13 %, respectively. Sub-analyses did not show any significant difference ( P  > 0.05) between the two categories of operators. Conclusions  In this single-center prospective study, the possible impact of AI on endoscopist quality training was demonstrated. In the future, this could result in better efficacy of screening colonoscopy by reducing the incidence of interval or missed cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9106428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91064282022-05-14 Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists Biscaglia, Giuseppe Cocomazzi, Francesco Gentile, Marco Loconte, Ilaria Mileti, Alessia Paolillo, Rosa Marra, Antonella Castellana, Stefano Mazza, Tommaso Di Leo, Alfredo Perri, Francesco Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a well-accepted quality indicator of screening colonoscopy. In recent years, the added value of artificial intelligence (AI) has been demonstrated in terms of ADR and adenoma miss rate (AMR). To date, there are no studies evaluating the impact of AI on the performance of trainee endoscopists (TEs). This study aimed to assess whether AI might eliminate any difference in ADR or AMR between TEs and experienced endoscopists (EEs). Patients and methods  We performed a prospective observational study in 45 subjects referred for screening colonoscopy. A same-day tandem examination was carried out for each patient by a TE with the AI assistance and subsequently by an EE unaware of the lesions detected by the TE. Besides ADR and AMR, we also calculated for each subgroup of endoscopists the adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), polyp detection rate (PDR), polyp per colonoscopy (PPC) and polyp miss rate (PMR). Subgroup analyses according to size, morphology, and site were also performed. Results  ADR, APC, PDR, and PPC of AI-supported TEs were 38 %, 0.93, 62 %, 1.93, respectively. The corresponding parameters for EEs were 40 %, 1.07, 58 %, 2.22. No significant difference was found for each analysis between the two groups ( P  > 0.05). AMR and PMR for AI-assisted TEs were 12.5 % and 13 %, respectively. Sub-analyses did not show any significant difference ( P  > 0.05) between the two categories of operators. Conclusions  In this single-center prospective study, the possible impact of AI on endoscopist quality training was demonstrated. In the future, this could result in better efficacy of screening colonoscopy by reducing the incidence of interval or missed cancers. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9106428/ /pubmed/35571479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1783-9678 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Biscaglia, Giuseppe
Cocomazzi, Francesco
Gentile, Marco
Loconte, Ilaria
Mileti, Alessia
Paolillo, Rosa
Marra, Antonella
Castellana, Stefano
Mazza, Tommaso
Di Leo, Alfredo
Perri, Francesco
Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists
title Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists
title_full Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists
title_fullStr Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists
title_full_unstemmed Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists
title_short Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists
title_sort real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1783-9678
work_keys_str_mv AT biscagliagiuseppe realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT cocomazzifrancesco realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT gentilemarco realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT loconteilaria realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT miletialessia realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT paolillorosa realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT marraantonella realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT castellanastefano realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT mazzatommaso realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT dileoalfredo realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists
AT perrifrancesco realtimecomputeraideddetectionassistedcolonoscopyeliminatesdifferencesinadenomadetectionratebetweentraineeandexperiencedendoscopists