Cargando…

Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury by meta-analysis. METHODS: Reviewed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, as well as China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Ye, Tang, Yun, Qin, Huiqing, Xu, Jianwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00776-z
_version_ 1784708319046270976
author Yang, Ye
Tang, Yun
Qin, Huiqing
Xu, Jianwen
author_facet Yang, Ye
Tang, Yun
Qin, Huiqing
Xu, Jianwen
author_sort Yang, Ye
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury by meta-analysis. METHODS: Reviewed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, as well as China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Vip databases to search the randomized controlled trials of pain after spinal cord injury through transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation from the beginning of the library to March 2021, and analyze the literature with RevMan 5.3 software and the bias in the literature with STATA 12.0 software. RESULTS: There are six randomized controlled trials in the study with 165 cases. 83 cases in the test group were given transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and 82 cases in the control group used sham stimulation or other treatments. Meta-analysis results showed the experimental group’s visual analog scale (MD = −1.52, 95%CI, −2.44 to −0.60, P = 0.001) and short-form McGill pain questionnaire scores (MD = −0.70, 95% CI, −1.03 to −0.25, P = 0.002) were lower than those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation has some clinical therapeutic effects on persons with pain after spinal cord injury, but due to the lack of literature, the sample size is not large, and clinical trials need to be further improved later.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9106573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91065732022-05-15 Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis Yang, Ye Tang, Yun Qin, Huiqing Xu, Jianwen Spinal Cord Review Article STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury by meta-analysis. METHODS: Reviewed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, as well as China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Vip databases to search the randomized controlled trials of pain after spinal cord injury through transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation from the beginning of the library to March 2021, and analyze the literature with RevMan 5.3 software and the bias in the literature with STATA 12.0 software. RESULTS: There are six randomized controlled trials in the study with 165 cases. 83 cases in the test group were given transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and 82 cases in the control group used sham stimulation or other treatments. Meta-analysis results showed the experimental group’s visual analog scale (MD = −1.52, 95%CI, −2.44 to −0.60, P = 0.001) and short-form McGill pain questionnaire scores (MD = −0.70, 95% CI, −1.03 to −0.25, P = 0.002) were lower than those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation has some clinical therapeutic effects on persons with pain after spinal cord injury, but due to the lack of literature, the sample size is not large, and clinical trials need to be further improved later. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9106573/ /pubmed/35277650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00776-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Yang, Ye
Tang, Yun
Qin, Huiqing
Xu, Jianwen
Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis
title Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00776-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yangye efficacyoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinpeoplewithpainafterspinalcordinjuryametaanalysis
AT tangyun efficacyoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinpeoplewithpainafterspinalcordinjuryametaanalysis
AT qinhuiqing efficacyoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinpeoplewithpainafterspinalcordinjuryametaanalysis
AT xujianwen efficacyoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinpeoplewithpainafterspinalcordinjuryametaanalysis