Cargando…

The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Worldwide reports have produced conflicting data on perinatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review and meta-analysis addressed the effect of mitigation measures against COVID-19 on preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, and NICU admission during the first nine months o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawco, Sarah, Rolnik, Daniel L., Woolner, Andrea, Cameron, Natalie J., Wyness, Victoria, Mol, Ben W., Black, Mairead
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.007
_version_ 1784708323905372160
author Hawco, Sarah
Rolnik, Daniel L.
Woolner, Andrea
Cameron, Natalie J.
Wyness, Victoria
Mol, Ben W.
Black, Mairead
author_facet Hawco, Sarah
Rolnik, Daniel L.
Woolner, Andrea
Cameron, Natalie J.
Wyness, Victoria
Mol, Ben W.
Black, Mairead
author_sort Hawco, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Worldwide reports have produced conflicting data on perinatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review and meta-analysis addressed the effect of mitigation measures against COVID-19 on preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, and NICU admission during the first nine months of the pandemic. A search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and SCOPUS for manuscripts published up until 24th May 2021. Studies that reported perinatal outcomes (preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, NICU admission) during the COVID-19 pandemic with a pre-pandemic control period were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using ROBINS-I tool. RevMan5 was used to perform meta-analysis with random-effects models. A score of the stringency of mitigation measures was calculated from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. Thirty-eight studies of moderate to serious risk of bias were included, with varied methodology, analysis and regional mitigation measures, using stringency index scores. There was no overall effect on preterm birth at less than 37 weeks (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92–1.00). However, there was a reduction in preterm birth at less than 37 weeks (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.98) and 34 weeks (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37–0.83) for iatrogenic births and in singleton pregnancies. There was also a significant reduction in preterm births at less than 34 weeks in studies with above median stringency index scores (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58–0.88). There was no effect on risk of stillbirth (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90–1.19) or birth weight. NICU admission rates were significantly reduced in studies with above median stringency index scores (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97). The reduction in preterm births in regions with high mitigation measures against SARS-CoV-2 infection is likely driven by a reduction in iatrogenic births. Variability in study design and cohort characteristics need to be considered for future studies to allow further investigation of population level health measures of perinatal outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9106593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91065932022-05-16 The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis Hawco, Sarah Rolnik, Daniel L. Woolner, Andrea Cameron, Natalie J. Wyness, Victoria Mol, Ben W. Black, Mairead Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Review Article Worldwide reports have produced conflicting data on perinatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review and meta-analysis addressed the effect of mitigation measures against COVID-19 on preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, and NICU admission during the first nine months of the pandemic. A search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and SCOPUS for manuscripts published up until 24th May 2021. Studies that reported perinatal outcomes (preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, NICU admission) during the COVID-19 pandemic with a pre-pandemic control period were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using ROBINS-I tool. RevMan5 was used to perform meta-analysis with random-effects models. A score of the stringency of mitigation measures was calculated from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. Thirty-eight studies of moderate to serious risk of bias were included, with varied methodology, analysis and regional mitigation measures, using stringency index scores. There was no overall effect on preterm birth at less than 37 weeks (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92–1.00). However, there was a reduction in preterm birth at less than 37 weeks (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.98) and 34 weeks (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37–0.83) for iatrogenic births and in singleton pregnancies. There was also a significant reduction in preterm births at less than 34 weeks in studies with above median stringency index scores (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58–0.88). There was no effect on risk of stillbirth (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90–1.19) or birth weight. NICU admission rates were significantly reduced in studies with above median stringency index scores (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97). The reduction in preterm births in regions with high mitigation measures against SARS-CoV-2 infection is likely driven by a reduction in iatrogenic births. Variability in study design and cohort characteristics need to be considered for future studies to allow further investigation of population level health measures of perinatal outcomes. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-07 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9106593/ /pubmed/35640440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.007 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hawco, Sarah
Rolnik, Daniel L.
Woolner, Andrea
Cameron, Natalie J.
Wyness, Victoria
Mol, Ben W.
Black, Mairead
The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.007
work_keys_str_mv AT hawcosarah theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT rolnikdaniell theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT woolnerandrea theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT cameronnataliej theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT wynessvictoria theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT molbenw theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT blackmairead theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT hawcosarah impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT rolnikdaniell impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT woolnerandrea impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT cameronnataliej impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT wynessvictoria impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT molbenw impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT blackmairead impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis