Cargando…
The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Worldwide reports have produced conflicting data on perinatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review and meta-analysis addressed the effect of mitigation measures against COVID-19 on preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, and NICU admission during the first nine months o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.007 |
_version_ | 1784708323905372160 |
---|---|
author | Hawco, Sarah Rolnik, Daniel L. Woolner, Andrea Cameron, Natalie J. Wyness, Victoria Mol, Ben W. Black, Mairead |
author_facet | Hawco, Sarah Rolnik, Daniel L. Woolner, Andrea Cameron, Natalie J. Wyness, Victoria Mol, Ben W. Black, Mairead |
author_sort | Hawco, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Worldwide reports have produced conflicting data on perinatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review and meta-analysis addressed the effect of mitigation measures against COVID-19 on preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, and NICU admission during the first nine months of the pandemic. A search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and SCOPUS for manuscripts published up until 24th May 2021. Studies that reported perinatal outcomes (preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, NICU admission) during the COVID-19 pandemic with a pre-pandemic control period were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using ROBINS-I tool. RevMan5 was used to perform meta-analysis with random-effects models. A score of the stringency of mitigation measures was calculated from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. Thirty-eight studies of moderate to serious risk of bias were included, with varied methodology, analysis and regional mitigation measures, using stringency index scores. There was no overall effect on preterm birth at less than 37 weeks (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92–1.00). However, there was a reduction in preterm birth at less than 37 weeks (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.98) and 34 weeks (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37–0.83) for iatrogenic births and in singleton pregnancies. There was also a significant reduction in preterm births at less than 34 weeks in studies with above median stringency index scores (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58–0.88). There was no effect on risk of stillbirth (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90–1.19) or birth weight. NICU admission rates were significantly reduced in studies with above median stringency index scores (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97). The reduction in preterm births in regions with high mitigation measures against SARS-CoV-2 infection is likely driven by a reduction in iatrogenic births. Variability in study design and cohort characteristics need to be considered for future studies to allow further investigation of population level health measures of perinatal outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9106593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91065932022-05-16 The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis Hawco, Sarah Rolnik, Daniel L. Woolner, Andrea Cameron, Natalie J. Wyness, Victoria Mol, Ben W. Black, Mairead Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Review Article Worldwide reports have produced conflicting data on perinatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review and meta-analysis addressed the effect of mitigation measures against COVID-19 on preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, and NICU admission during the first nine months of the pandemic. A search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and SCOPUS for manuscripts published up until 24th May 2021. Studies that reported perinatal outcomes (preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, NICU admission) during the COVID-19 pandemic with a pre-pandemic control period were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using ROBINS-I tool. RevMan5 was used to perform meta-analysis with random-effects models. A score of the stringency of mitigation measures was calculated from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. Thirty-eight studies of moderate to serious risk of bias were included, with varied methodology, analysis and regional mitigation measures, using stringency index scores. There was no overall effect on preterm birth at less than 37 weeks (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92–1.00). However, there was a reduction in preterm birth at less than 37 weeks (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.98) and 34 weeks (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37–0.83) for iatrogenic births and in singleton pregnancies. There was also a significant reduction in preterm births at less than 34 weeks in studies with above median stringency index scores (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58–0.88). There was no effect on risk of stillbirth (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90–1.19) or birth weight. NICU admission rates were significantly reduced in studies with above median stringency index scores (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97). The reduction in preterm births in regions with high mitigation measures against SARS-CoV-2 infection is likely driven by a reduction in iatrogenic births. Variability in study design and cohort characteristics need to be considered for future studies to allow further investigation of population level health measures of perinatal outcomes. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-07 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9106593/ /pubmed/35640440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.007 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hawco, Sarah Rolnik, Daniel L. Woolner, Andrea Cameron, Natalie J. Wyness, Victoria Mol, Ben W. Black, Mairead The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title | The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full | The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_short | The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_sort | impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hawcosarah theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT rolnikdaniell theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT woolnerandrea theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT cameronnataliej theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT wynessvictoria theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT molbenw theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT blackmairead theimpactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT hawcosarah impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT rolnikdaniell impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT woolnerandrea impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT cameronnataliej impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT wynessvictoria impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT molbenw impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT blackmairead impactofmitigationmeasuresonperinataloutcomesduringthefirstninemonthsofthecovid19pandemicasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis |