Cargando…
Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures; however, high rates of adherence are needed to preserve clinical benefits. OBJECTIVE: To investigate persistence and compliance to oral and intravenous bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35188591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06350-w |
_version_ | 1784708334002110464 |
---|---|
author | Bastounis, A. Langley, T. Davis, S. Paskins, Z. Gittoes, N. Leonardi-Bee, J. Sahota, O. |
author_facet | Bastounis, A. Langley, T. Davis, S. Paskins, Z. Gittoes, N. Leonardi-Bee, J. Sahota, O. |
author_sort | Bastounis, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures; however, high rates of adherence are needed to preserve clinical benefits. OBJECTIVE: To investigate persistence and compliance to oral and intravenous bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate). METHODS: Searches of 12 databases, unpublished sources, and trial registries were conducted, covering the period from 2000 to April 2021. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool 1.0 & ROBINS-I) were independently undertaken by two study authors. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that used prescription claim databases or hospital medical records to examine patients’ adherence were included. Network meta-analyses (NMA) embedded within a Bayesian framework were conducted, investigating users’ likelihood in discontinuing bisphosphonate treatment. Where meta-analysis was not possible, data were synthesised using the vote-counting synthesis method. RESULTS: Fifty-nine RCTs and 43 observational studies were identified, resulting in a total population of 2,656,659 participants. Data from 59 RCTs and 24 observational studies were used to populate NMAs. Zoledronate users were the least likely to discontinue their treatment HR = 0.73 (95%CrI: 0.61, 0.88). Higher rates of compliance were observed in those receiving intravenous treatments. The paucity of data and the heterogeneity in the reported medication possession ratio thresholds precluded a NMA of compliance data. CONCLUSIONS: Users of intravenously administered bisphosphonates were found to be the most adherent to treatment among bisphosphonates’ users. Patterns of adherence will permit the more precise estimation of clinical and cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020177166 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00198-022-06350-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9106630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91066302022-05-15 Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis Bastounis, A. Langley, T. Davis, S. Paskins, Z. Gittoes, N. Leonardi-Bee, J. Sahota, O. Osteoporos Int Review BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures; however, high rates of adherence are needed to preserve clinical benefits. OBJECTIVE: To investigate persistence and compliance to oral and intravenous bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate). METHODS: Searches of 12 databases, unpublished sources, and trial registries were conducted, covering the period from 2000 to April 2021. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool 1.0 & ROBINS-I) were independently undertaken by two study authors. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that used prescription claim databases or hospital medical records to examine patients’ adherence were included. Network meta-analyses (NMA) embedded within a Bayesian framework were conducted, investigating users’ likelihood in discontinuing bisphosphonate treatment. Where meta-analysis was not possible, data were synthesised using the vote-counting synthesis method. RESULTS: Fifty-nine RCTs and 43 observational studies were identified, resulting in a total population of 2,656,659 participants. Data from 59 RCTs and 24 observational studies were used to populate NMAs. Zoledronate users were the least likely to discontinue their treatment HR = 0.73 (95%CrI: 0.61, 0.88). Higher rates of compliance were observed in those receiving intravenous treatments. The paucity of data and the heterogeneity in the reported medication possession ratio thresholds precluded a NMA of compliance data. CONCLUSIONS: Users of intravenously administered bisphosphonates were found to be the most adherent to treatment among bisphosphonates’ users. Patterns of adherence will permit the more precise estimation of clinical and cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020177166 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00198-022-06350-w. Springer London 2022-02-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9106630/ /pubmed/35188591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06350-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Bastounis, A. Langley, T. Davis, S. Paskins, Z. Gittoes, N. Leonardi-Bee, J. Sahota, O. Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35188591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06350-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bastounisa comparingmedicationadherenceinpatientsreceivingbisphosphonatesforpreventingfragilityfracturesacomprehensivesystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT langleyt comparingmedicationadherenceinpatientsreceivingbisphosphonatesforpreventingfragilityfracturesacomprehensivesystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT daviss comparingmedicationadherenceinpatientsreceivingbisphosphonatesforpreventingfragilityfracturesacomprehensivesystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT paskinsz comparingmedicationadherenceinpatientsreceivingbisphosphonatesforpreventingfragilityfracturesacomprehensivesystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT gittoesn comparingmedicationadherenceinpatientsreceivingbisphosphonatesforpreventingfragilityfracturesacomprehensivesystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT leonardibeej comparingmedicationadherenceinpatientsreceivingbisphosphonatesforpreventingfragilityfracturesacomprehensivesystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT sahotao comparingmedicationadherenceinpatientsreceivingbisphosphonatesforpreventingfragilityfracturesacomprehensivesystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |