Cargando…

The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation

BACKGROUND: The location of cephalic fixator tip with different eccentric distance (ED) should have different risks of cutout. This study aims to evaluate the cephalic fixator tip position by measuring ED of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric ITF patients with single-screw cephalomedullary nail (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yun-fa, Huang, Jian-wen, Gao, Xiao-sheng, Xu, Zhong-he
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35562761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03153-x
_version_ 1784708425324691456
author Yang, Yun-fa
Huang, Jian-wen
Gao, Xiao-sheng
Xu, Zhong-he
author_facet Yang, Yun-fa
Huang, Jian-wen
Gao, Xiao-sheng
Xu, Zhong-he
author_sort Yang, Yun-fa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The location of cephalic fixator tip with different eccentric distance (ED) should have different risks of cutout. This study aims to evaluate the cephalic fixator tip position by measuring ED of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric ITF patients with single-screw cephalomedullary nail (SCMN) fixation and analyze the correlation between the cutout and the ED. METHODS: Firstly, we assumed all the femoral head was a regular sphere and standardized the radius of the femoral head (R(FD)) as “3” no matter how big the R(FD) was for complete match of the Cleveland zone system and convenient identification of artificial intelligence. Secondly, we measured the ED of the cephalic fixator tip by calculating the distances from the cephalic fixator tip to the geometric central axis of the femoral neck and head on both AP view and lateral view radiographs. Thirdly, we evaluated all the ED of the cephalic fixator tip in the eligible 123 geriatric ITF patients and analyzed the correlation between the cutout and the ED. RESULTS: The ED in cutout group (1.25 ± 0.43) is much bigger than that in non-cutout group (0.64 ± 0.34) with significant difference (OR = 50.01, 95% CI 8.42–297.19, p < 0.001). The probability of cutout increased with ED increasing, especially when “ED ≥ 1.” The best cutoff value of ED for predicting cutout was “1.022” (“1.022” was just a little bit more than 1/3 times of R(FD) because “R(FD) = 3,” sensitivity = 73.3%, specificity = 86.1%, and AUC = 0.867, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ED is suitable for evaluation of the cephalic fixator tip position for predicting cutout in geriatric ITF patients with SCMN fixation, and ED can potentially be used as artificial intelligence application during surgery. The smaller the ED, the lower the cutout rate. For avoiding cutout, the ED of the cephalic fixator tip should be less than one-third times of the radius of the femoral head.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9107135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91071352022-05-15 The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation Yang, Yun-fa Huang, Jian-wen Gao, Xiao-sheng Xu, Zhong-he J Orthop Surg Res Research BACKGROUND: The location of cephalic fixator tip with different eccentric distance (ED) should have different risks of cutout. This study aims to evaluate the cephalic fixator tip position by measuring ED of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric ITF patients with single-screw cephalomedullary nail (SCMN) fixation and analyze the correlation between the cutout and the ED. METHODS: Firstly, we assumed all the femoral head was a regular sphere and standardized the radius of the femoral head (R(FD)) as “3” no matter how big the R(FD) was for complete match of the Cleveland zone system and convenient identification of artificial intelligence. Secondly, we measured the ED of the cephalic fixator tip by calculating the distances from the cephalic fixator tip to the geometric central axis of the femoral neck and head on both AP view and lateral view radiographs. Thirdly, we evaluated all the ED of the cephalic fixator tip in the eligible 123 geriatric ITF patients and analyzed the correlation between the cutout and the ED. RESULTS: The ED in cutout group (1.25 ± 0.43) is much bigger than that in non-cutout group (0.64 ± 0.34) with significant difference (OR = 50.01, 95% CI 8.42–297.19, p < 0.001). The probability of cutout increased with ED increasing, especially when “ED ≥ 1.” The best cutoff value of ED for predicting cutout was “1.022” (“1.022” was just a little bit more than 1/3 times of R(FD) because “R(FD) = 3,” sensitivity = 73.3%, specificity = 86.1%, and AUC = 0.867, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ED is suitable for evaluation of the cephalic fixator tip position for predicting cutout in geriatric ITF patients with SCMN fixation, and ED can potentially be used as artificial intelligence application during surgery. The smaller the ED, the lower the cutout rate. For avoiding cutout, the ED of the cephalic fixator tip should be less than one-third times of the radius of the femoral head. BioMed Central 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9107135/ /pubmed/35562761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03153-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yang, Yun-fa
Huang, Jian-wen
Gao, Xiao-sheng
Xu, Zhong-he
The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation
title The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation
title_full The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation
title_fullStr The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation
title_full_unstemmed The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation
title_short The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation
title_sort correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ed) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35562761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03153-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyunfa thecorrelationbetweencutoutandeccentricdistanceedofthecephalicfixatortipingeriatricintertrochantericfractureswithinternalfixation
AT huangjianwen thecorrelationbetweencutoutandeccentricdistanceedofthecephalicfixatortipingeriatricintertrochantericfractureswithinternalfixation
AT gaoxiaosheng thecorrelationbetweencutoutandeccentricdistanceedofthecephalicfixatortipingeriatricintertrochantericfractureswithinternalfixation
AT xuzhonghe thecorrelationbetweencutoutandeccentricdistanceedofthecephalicfixatortipingeriatricintertrochantericfractureswithinternalfixation
AT yangyunfa correlationbetweencutoutandeccentricdistanceedofthecephalicfixatortipingeriatricintertrochantericfractureswithinternalfixation
AT huangjianwen correlationbetweencutoutandeccentricdistanceedofthecephalicfixatortipingeriatricintertrochantericfractureswithinternalfixation
AT gaoxiaosheng correlationbetweencutoutandeccentricdistanceedofthecephalicfixatortipingeriatricintertrochantericfractureswithinternalfixation
AT xuzhonghe correlationbetweencutoutandeccentricdistanceedofthecephalicfixatortipingeriatricintertrochantericfractureswithinternalfixation