Cargando…
An optimal brain tumor segmentation algorithm for clinical MRI dataset with low resolution and non-contiguous slices
BACKGROUND: Segmenting brain tumor and its constituent regions from magnetic resonance images (MRI) is important for planning diagnosis and treatment. In clinical routine often an experienced radiologist delineates the tumor regions using multimodal MRI. But this manual segmentation is prone to poor...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00812-7 |
_version_ | 1784708432647946240 |
---|---|
author | Battalapalli, Dheerendranath Rao, B. V. V. S. N. Prabhakar Yogeeswari, P. Kesavadas, C. Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran |
author_facet | Battalapalli, Dheerendranath Rao, B. V. V. S. N. Prabhakar Yogeeswari, P. Kesavadas, C. Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran |
author_sort | Battalapalli, Dheerendranath |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Segmenting brain tumor and its constituent regions from magnetic resonance images (MRI) is important for planning diagnosis and treatment. In clinical routine often an experienced radiologist delineates the tumor regions using multimodal MRI. But this manual segmentation is prone to poor reproducibility and is time consuming. Also, routine clinical scans are usually of low resolution. To overcome these limitations an automated and precise segmentation algorithm based on computer vision is needed. METHODS: We investigated the performance of three widely used segmentation methods namely region growing, fuzzy C means and deep neural networks (deepmedic). We evaluated these algorithms on the BRATS 2018 dataset by choosing randomly 48 patients data (high grade, n = 24 and low grade, n = 24) and on our routine clinical MRI brain tumor dataset (high grade, n = 15 and low grade, n = 28). We measured their performance using dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance and volume measures. RESULTS: Region growing method performed very poorly when compared to fuzzy C means (fcm) and deepmedic network. Dice similarity coefficient scores for FCM and deepmedic algorithms were close to each other for BRATS and clinical dataset. The accuracy was below 70% for both these methods in general. CONCLUSION: Even though the deepmedic network showed very high accuracy in BRATS challenge for brain tumor segmentation, it has to be custom trained for the low resolution routine clinical scans. It also requires large training data to be used as a stand-alone algorithm for clinical applications. Nevertheless deepmedic may be a better algorithm for brain tumor segmentation when compared to region growing or FCM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9107172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91071722022-05-15 An optimal brain tumor segmentation algorithm for clinical MRI dataset with low resolution and non-contiguous slices Battalapalli, Dheerendranath Rao, B. V. V. S. N. Prabhakar Yogeeswari, P. Kesavadas, C. Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: Segmenting brain tumor and its constituent regions from magnetic resonance images (MRI) is important for planning diagnosis and treatment. In clinical routine often an experienced radiologist delineates the tumor regions using multimodal MRI. But this manual segmentation is prone to poor reproducibility and is time consuming. Also, routine clinical scans are usually of low resolution. To overcome these limitations an automated and precise segmentation algorithm based on computer vision is needed. METHODS: We investigated the performance of three widely used segmentation methods namely region growing, fuzzy C means and deep neural networks (deepmedic). We evaluated these algorithms on the BRATS 2018 dataset by choosing randomly 48 patients data (high grade, n = 24 and low grade, n = 24) and on our routine clinical MRI brain tumor dataset (high grade, n = 15 and low grade, n = 28). We measured their performance using dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance and volume measures. RESULTS: Region growing method performed very poorly when compared to fuzzy C means (fcm) and deepmedic network. Dice similarity coefficient scores for FCM and deepmedic algorithms were close to each other for BRATS and clinical dataset. The accuracy was below 70% for both these methods in general. CONCLUSION: Even though the deepmedic network showed very high accuracy in BRATS challenge for brain tumor segmentation, it has to be custom trained for the low resolution routine clinical scans. It also requires large training data to be used as a stand-alone algorithm for clinical applications. Nevertheless deepmedic may be a better algorithm for brain tumor segmentation when compared to region growing or FCM. BioMed Central 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9107172/ /pubmed/35568820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00812-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Battalapalli, Dheerendranath Rao, B. V. V. S. N. Prabhakar Yogeeswari, P. Kesavadas, C. Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran An optimal brain tumor segmentation algorithm for clinical MRI dataset with low resolution and non-contiguous slices |
title | An optimal brain tumor segmentation algorithm for clinical MRI dataset with low resolution and non-contiguous slices |
title_full | An optimal brain tumor segmentation algorithm for clinical MRI dataset with low resolution and non-contiguous slices |
title_fullStr | An optimal brain tumor segmentation algorithm for clinical MRI dataset with low resolution and non-contiguous slices |
title_full_unstemmed | An optimal brain tumor segmentation algorithm for clinical MRI dataset with low resolution and non-contiguous slices |
title_short | An optimal brain tumor segmentation algorithm for clinical MRI dataset with low resolution and non-contiguous slices |
title_sort | optimal brain tumor segmentation algorithm for clinical mri dataset with low resolution and non-contiguous slices |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00812-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT battalapallidheerendranath anoptimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices AT raobvvsnprabhakar anoptimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices AT yogeeswarip anoptimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices AT kesavadasc anoptimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices AT rajagopalanvenkateswaran anoptimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices AT battalapallidheerendranath optimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices AT raobvvsnprabhakar optimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices AT yogeeswarip optimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices AT kesavadasc optimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices AT rajagopalanvenkateswaran optimalbraintumorsegmentationalgorithmforclinicalmridatasetwithlowresolutionandnoncontiguousslices |