Cargando…

Effects of COVID-19 restriction measures in Indonesia: A comparative spatial and policy analysis of selected urban agglomerations

With higher densities, urban agglomerations account for the fastest rates of COVID-19 transmission. In Indonesia, one of the most rapidly urbanizing regions in the world, the national government issues overall policy on the pandemic. However, implementation is often contingent on local governments....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Handayani, Wiwandari, Insani, Tia Dianing, Fisher, Micah, Gim, Tae-Hyoung Tommy, Mardhotillah, Santi, Adam, Urban El-fatih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103015
_version_ 1784708436606320640
author Handayani, Wiwandari
Insani, Tia Dianing
Fisher, Micah
Gim, Tae-Hyoung Tommy
Mardhotillah, Santi
Adam, Urban El-fatih
author_facet Handayani, Wiwandari
Insani, Tia Dianing
Fisher, Micah
Gim, Tae-Hyoung Tommy
Mardhotillah, Santi
Adam, Urban El-fatih
author_sort Handayani, Wiwandari
collection PubMed
description With higher densities, urban agglomerations account for the fastest rates of COVID-19 transmission. In Indonesia, one of the most rapidly urbanizing regions in the world, the national government issues overall policy on the pandemic. However, implementation is often contingent on local governments. Many policies aim to stem the spread of infection by controlling people's mobility or regulating their daily activities. Urban agglomerations are a strategic site of investigation in this light, because they consist of interconnected communities governed by various levels and jurisdictions. This paper analyzes the effects of policy interventions relative to confirmed cases in the seven major urban agglomerations in Indonesia (totaling 30 municipal/district governments). Data were collected from confirmed and fatality trends from March to mid-October 2020, which were contrasted with corresponding policies for each jurisdiction. By sorting the indicators of the spread of the pandemic and its corresponding control measures, we reach conclusions about which dimensions served to curb or trigger the surge of COVID-19 clusters. The analysis unsurprisingly shows that within each agglomeration, the main cities continue to represent the highest number of confirmed cases despite variations between them. This study also highlights two key findings. First, the effectiveness of distancing measures depends considerably on the capacity of governments to implement restrictions. For example, budget limitations resulted in uneven implementation of national mandates by decentralized authority. Facilities and services at different locations also influence our understanding of disease transmission. Second, people's ability and willingness to engage with a policy regime is contingent upon personal values or economic constraints. The study shows that viewing the spatial distribution of COVID-19 at the scale of urban agglomerations helps to explain key aspects of transmission and policy, pointing to recommendations about pursuing certain protocols. Nevertheless, key challenges remain to meet the full potential of this analytical approach, due to relatively low levels of testing and inadequate data collection measures in Indonesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9107187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91071872022-05-16 Effects of COVID-19 restriction measures in Indonesia: A comparative spatial and policy analysis of selected urban agglomerations Handayani, Wiwandari Insani, Tia Dianing Fisher, Micah Gim, Tae-Hyoung Tommy Mardhotillah, Santi Adam, Urban El-fatih Int J Disaster Risk Reduct Article With higher densities, urban agglomerations account for the fastest rates of COVID-19 transmission. In Indonesia, one of the most rapidly urbanizing regions in the world, the national government issues overall policy on the pandemic. However, implementation is often contingent on local governments. Many policies aim to stem the spread of infection by controlling people's mobility or regulating their daily activities. Urban agglomerations are a strategic site of investigation in this light, because they consist of interconnected communities governed by various levels and jurisdictions. This paper analyzes the effects of policy interventions relative to confirmed cases in the seven major urban agglomerations in Indonesia (totaling 30 municipal/district governments). Data were collected from confirmed and fatality trends from March to mid-October 2020, which were contrasted with corresponding policies for each jurisdiction. By sorting the indicators of the spread of the pandemic and its corresponding control measures, we reach conclusions about which dimensions served to curb or trigger the surge of COVID-19 clusters. The analysis unsurprisingly shows that within each agglomeration, the main cities continue to represent the highest number of confirmed cases despite variations between them. This study also highlights two key findings. First, the effectiveness of distancing measures depends considerably on the capacity of governments to implement restrictions. For example, budget limitations resulted in uneven implementation of national mandates by decentralized authority. Facilities and services at different locations also influence our understanding of disease transmission. Second, people's ability and willingness to engage with a policy regime is contingent upon personal values or economic constraints. The study shows that viewing the spatial distribution of COVID-19 at the scale of urban agglomerations helps to explain key aspects of transmission and policy, pointing to recommendations about pursuing certain protocols. Nevertheless, key challenges remain to meet the full potential of this analytical approach, due to relatively low levels of testing and inadequate data collection measures in Indonesia. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-06-15 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9107187/ /pubmed/35601393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103015 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Handayani, Wiwandari
Insani, Tia Dianing
Fisher, Micah
Gim, Tae-Hyoung Tommy
Mardhotillah, Santi
Adam, Urban El-fatih
Effects of COVID-19 restriction measures in Indonesia: A comparative spatial and policy analysis of selected urban agglomerations
title Effects of COVID-19 restriction measures in Indonesia: A comparative spatial and policy analysis of selected urban agglomerations
title_full Effects of COVID-19 restriction measures in Indonesia: A comparative spatial and policy analysis of selected urban agglomerations
title_fullStr Effects of COVID-19 restriction measures in Indonesia: A comparative spatial and policy analysis of selected urban agglomerations
title_full_unstemmed Effects of COVID-19 restriction measures in Indonesia: A comparative spatial and policy analysis of selected urban agglomerations
title_short Effects of COVID-19 restriction measures in Indonesia: A comparative spatial and policy analysis of selected urban agglomerations
title_sort effects of covid-19 restriction measures in indonesia: a comparative spatial and policy analysis of selected urban agglomerations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103015
work_keys_str_mv AT handayaniwiwandari effectsofcovid19restrictionmeasuresinindonesiaacomparativespatialandpolicyanalysisofselectedurbanagglomerations
AT insanitiadianing effectsofcovid19restrictionmeasuresinindonesiaacomparativespatialandpolicyanalysisofselectedurbanagglomerations
AT fishermicah effectsofcovid19restrictionmeasuresinindonesiaacomparativespatialandpolicyanalysisofselectedurbanagglomerations
AT gimtaehyoungtommy effectsofcovid19restrictionmeasuresinindonesiaacomparativespatialandpolicyanalysisofselectedurbanagglomerations
AT mardhotillahsanti effectsofcovid19restrictionmeasuresinindonesiaacomparativespatialandpolicyanalysisofselectedurbanagglomerations
AT adamurbanelfatih effectsofcovid19restrictionmeasuresinindonesiaacomparativespatialandpolicyanalysisofselectedurbanagglomerations