Cargando…
Combinations of action observation and motor imagery on golf putting’s performance
Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) have been found to enhance motor performance, but recent research found that a combination of action observation and motor imagery (AOMI) together is even better. Despite this initial finding, the most effective way to combine them is unknown. The prese...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578670 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13432 |
_version_ | 1784708460640731136 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Chi-Hsian Lu, Frank J.H. Gill, Diane L. Huang, Ken Shih-Kuei Wu, Shu-Ching Chiu, Yi-Hsiang |
author_facet | Lin, Chi-Hsian Lu, Frank J.H. Gill, Diane L. Huang, Ken Shih-Kuei Wu, Shu-Ching Chiu, Yi-Hsiang |
author_sort | Lin, Chi-Hsian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) have been found to enhance motor performance, but recent research found that a combination of action observation and motor imagery (AOMI) together is even better. Despite this initial finding, the most effective way to combine them is unknown. The present study examined the effects of synchronized (i e., concurrently doing AO and MI), asynchronised (i.e., first doing AO then MI), and progressive (first asynchronised approach, then doing synchronized approach) AOMI on golf putting performance and learning. We recruited 45 university students (Mage = 20.18 + 1.32 years; males = 23, females = 22) and randomly assigned them into the following four groups: synchronized group (S-AOMI), asynchronised group (A-AOMI), progressive group (A-S-AOMI), and a control group with a pre-post research design. Participants engaged in a 6-week (three times/per-week) intervention, plus two retention tests. A two-way (group × time) mixed ANOVA statistical analysis found that the three experimental groups performed better than the control group after intervention. However, we found progressive and asynchronised had better golf putting scores than synchronized group and the control group on the retention tests. Our results advance knowledge in AOMI research, but it needs more research to reveal the best way of combining AOMI in the future. Theoretical implications, limitations, applications, and future suggestions are also discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9107300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91073002022-05-15 Combinations of action observation and motor imagery on golf putting’s performance Lin, Chi-Hsian Lu, Frank J.H. Gill, Diane L. Huang, Ken Shih-Kuei Wu, Shu-Ching Chiu, Yi-Hsiang PeerJ Kinesiology Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) have been found to enhance motor performance, but recent research found that a combination of action observation and motor imagery (AOMI) together is even better. Despite this initial finding, the most effective way to combine them is unknown. The present study examined the effects of synchronized (i e., concurrently doing AO and MI), asynchronised (i.e., first doing AO then MI), and progressive (first asynchronised approach, then doing synchronized approach) AOMI on golf putting performance and learning. We recruited 45 university students (Mage = 20.18 + 1.32 years; males = 23, females = 22) and randomly assigned them into the following four groups: synchronized group (S-AOMI), asynchronised group (A-AOMI), progressive group (A-S-AOMI), and a control group with a pre-post research design. Participants engaged in a 6-week (three times/per-week) intervention, plus two retention tests. A two-way (group × time) mixed ANOVA statistical analysis found that the three experimental groups performed better than the control group after intervention. However, we found progressive and asynchronised had better golf putting scores than synchronized group and the control group on the retention tests. Our results advance knowledge in AOMI research, but it needs more research to reveal the best way of combining AOMI in the future. Theoretical implications, limitations, applications, and future suggestions are also discussed. PeerJ Inc. 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9107300/ /pubmed/35578670 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13432 Text en ©2022 Lin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Kinesiology Lin, Chi-Hsian Lu, Frank J.H. Gill, Diane L. Huang, Ken Shih-Kuei Wu, Shu-Ching Chiu, Yi-Hsiang Combinations of action observation and motor imagery on golf putting’s performance |
title | Combinations of action observation and motor imagery on golf putting’s performance |
title_full | Combinations of action observation and motor imagery on golf putting’s performance |
title_fullStr | Combinations of action observation and motor imagery on golf putting’s performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Combinations of action observation and motor imagery on golf putting’s performance |
title_short | Combinations of action observation and motor imagery on golf putting’s performance |
title_sort | combinations of action observation and motor imagery on golf putting’s performance |
topic | Kinesiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578670 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13432 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linchihsian combinationsofactionobservationandmotorimageryongolfputtingsperformance AT lufrankjh combinationsofactionobservationandmotorimageryongolfputtingsperformance AT gilldianel combinationsofactionobservationandmotorimageryongolfputtingsperformance AT huangkenshihkuei combinationsofactionobservationandmotorimageryongolfputtingsperformance AT wushuching combinationsofactionobservationandmotorimageryongolfputtingsperformance AT chiuyihsiang combinationsofactionobservationandmotorimageryongolfputtingsperformance |