Cargando…

Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication

Research integrity, an essential precept of scientific inquiry and discovery, comprises norms such as Rigor, Reproducibility, and Responsibility (the 3R’s). Over the past decades, numerous issues have arisen that challenge the reliability of scientific studies, including irreproducibility crises, la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciubotariu, Ilinca I., Bosch, Gundula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35570294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06065-5
_version_ 1784708524929974272
author Ciubotariu, Ilinca I.
Bosch, Gundula
author_facet Ciubotariu, Ilinca I.
Bosch, Gundula
author_sort Ciubotariu, Ilinca I.
collection PubMed
description Research integrity, an essential precept of scientific inquiry and discovery, comprises norms such as Rigor, Reproducibility, and Responsibility (the 3R’s). Over the past decades, numerous issues have arisen that challenge the reliability of scientific studies, including irreproducibility crises, lack of good scientific principles, and erroneous communications, which have impacted the public’s trust in science and its findings. Here, we highlight one important component of research integrity that is often overlooked in the discussion of proposals for improving research quality and promoting robust research; one that spans from the lab bench to the dissemination of scientific work: responsible science communication. We briefly outline the role of education and institutions of higher education in teaching the tenets of good scientific practice and within that, the importance of adequate communications training. In that context, we present our framework of responsible science communication that we live by and teach to our students in courses and workshops that are part of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health R(3) Center for Innovation in Science Education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9107633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91076332022-05-16 Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication Ciubotariu, Ilinca I. Bosch, Gundula BMC Res Notes Commentary Research integrity, an essential precept of scientific inquiry and discovery, comprises norms such as Rigor, Reproducibility, and Responsibility (the 3R’s). Over the past decades, numerous issues have arisen that challenge the reliability of scientific studies, including irreproducibility crises, lack of good scientific principles, and erroneous communications, which have impacted the public’s trust in science and its findings. Here, we highlight one important component of research integrity that is often overlooked in the discussion of proposals for improving research quality and promoting robust research; one that spans from the lab bench to the dissemination of scientific work: responsible science communication. We briefly outline the role of education and institutions of higher education in teaching the tenets of good scientific practice and within that, the importance of adequate communications training. In that context, we present our framework of responsible science communication that we live by and teach to our students in courses and workshops that are part of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health R(3) Center for Innovation in Science Education. BioMed Central 2022-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9107633/ /pubmed/35570294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06065-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Ciubotariu, Ilinca I.
Bosch, Gundula
Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication
title Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication
title_full Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication
title_fullStr Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication
title_full_unstemmed Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication
title_short Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication
title_sort improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35570294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06065-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ciubotariuilincai improvingresearchintegrityaframeworkforresponsiblesciencecommunication
AT boschgundula improvingresearchintegrityaframeworkforresponsiblesciencecommunication