Cargando…

Mass media campaigns for the promotion of oral health: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Oral diseases are highly prevalent globally and are largely preventable. Individual and group-based education strategies have been dominant in oral health promotion efforts. Population-wide mass media campaigns have a potentially valuable role in improving oral health behaviours and rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldberg, Eileen, Eberhard, Joerg, Bauman, Adrian, Smith, Ben J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02212-3
_version_ 1784708551742062592
author Goldberg, Eileen
Eberhard, Joerg
Bauman, Adrian
Smith, Ben J.
author_facet Goldberg, Eileen
Eberhard, Joerg
Bauman, Adrian
Smith, Ben J.
author_sort Goldberg, Eileen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral diseases are highly prevalent globally and are largely preventable. Individual and group-based education strategies have been dominant in oral health promotion efforts. Population-wide mass media campaigns have a potentially valuable role in improving oral health behaviours and related determinants. This review synthesises evidence from evaluations of these campaigns. METHODS: A systematic search of major databases was undertaken to identify peer-reviewed articles reporting the evaluation of mass reach (non-interpersonal) communication strategies to address common forms of oral disease (i.e., dental caries, periodontitis, gingivitis). Studies using all types of quantitative design, published in English between 1970 and 2020 were included. Data concerning campaign objectives, content, evaluation methods and findings were extracted. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included from the 499 identified through searching, reporting the findings of 11 campaign evaluations. Two of these used controlled quasi-experimental designs, with the remainder using pre- and post-test (N = 5) or post-test only designs (N = 4). Message recall, as a measure of exposure, was reported in eight campaigns with short-term (≤ 8 weeks) recall ranging from 30 to 97%. Eight studies examined impacts upon oral health knowledge, with four of the five measuring this at baseline and follow-up reporting improvements. From the eight studies measuring oral health behaviours or use of preventative services, six that compared baseline and follow-up reported improvements (N = 2 in children, N = 4 in adults). CONCLUSION: There are relatively few studies reporting the evaluation of mass media campaigns to promote oral health at the population level. Further, there is limited application of best-practice methods in campaign development, implementation and evaluation in this field. The available findings indicate promise in terms of achieving campaign recall and short-term improvements in oral health knowledge and behaviours. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02212-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9107752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91077522022-05-16 Mass media campaigns for the promotion of oral health: a scoping review Goldberg, Eileen Eberhard, Joerg Bauman, Adrian Smith, Ben J. BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Oral diseases are highly prevalent globally and are largely preventable. Individual and group-based education strategies have been dominant in oral health promotion efforts. Population-wide mass media campaigns have a potentially valuable role in improving oral health behaviours and related determinants. This review synthesises evidence from evaluations of these campaigns. METHODS: A systematic search of major databases was undertaken to identify peer-reviewed articles reporting the evaluation of mass reach (non-interpersonal) communication strategies to address common forms of oral disease (i.e., dental caries, periodontitis, gingivitis). Studies using all types of quantitative design, published in English between 1970 and 2020 were included. Data concerning campaign objectives, content, evaluation methods and findings were extracted. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included from the 499 identified through searching, reporting the findings of 11 campaign evaluations. Two of these used controlled quasi-experimental designs, with the remainder using pre- and post-test (N = 5) or post-test only designs (N = 4). Message recall, as a measure of exposure, was reported in eight campaigns with short-term (≤ 8 weeks) recall ranging from 30 to 97%. Eight studies examined impacts upon oral health knowledge, with four of the five measuring this at baseline and follow-up reporting improvements. From the eight studies measuring oral health behaviours or use of preventative services, six that compared baseline and follow-up reported improvements (N = 2 in children, N = 4 in adults). CONCLUSION: There are relatively few studies reporting the evaluation of mass media campaigns to promote oral health at the population level. Further, there is limited application of best-practice methods in campaign development, implementation and evaluation in this field. The available findings indicate promise in terms of achieving campaign recall and short-term improvements in oral health knowledge and behaviours. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02212-3. BioMed Central 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9107752/ /pubmed/35568896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02212-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Goldberg, Eileen
Eberhard, Joerg
Bauman, Adrian
Smith, Ben J.
Mass media campaigns for the promotion of oral health: a scoping review
title Mass media campaigns for the promotion of oral health: a scoping review
title_full Mass media campaigns for the promotion of oral health: a scoping review
title_fullStr Mass media campaigns for the promotion of oral health: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Mass media campaigns for the promotion of oral health: a scoping review
title_short Mass media campaigns for the promotion of oral health: a scoping review
title_sort mass media campaigns for the promotion of oral health: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9107752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02212-3
work_keys_str_mv AT goldbergeileen massmediacampaignsforthepromotionoforalhealthascopingreview
AT eberhardjoerg massmediacampaignsforthepromotionoforalhealthascopingreview
AT baumanadrian massmediacampaignsforthepromotionoforalhealthascopingreview
AT smithbenj massmediacampaignsforthepromotionoforalhealthascopingreview