Cargando…

Experimental pre-tests of public health communications on the COVID-19 vaccine: A null finding for medical endorsement, risk and altruism

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination campaigns against COVID-19 will only be successful if enough people want to take the vaccine. We tested a government communications intervention to encourage uptake. DESIGN: A pre-registered randomised controlled trial. METHODS: A large, nationally representative sample were r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robertson, Deirdre A., Mohr, Kieran S., Barjaková, Martina, Lunn, Peter D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.029
_version_ 1784708614851657728
author Robertson, Deirdre A.
Mohr, Kieran S.
Barjaková, Martina
Lunn, Peter D.
author_facet Robertson, Deirdre A.
Mohr, Kieran S.
Barjaková, Martina
Lunn, Peter D.
author_sort Robertson, Deirdre A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Vaccination campaigns against COVID-19 will only be successful if enough people want to take the vaccine. We tested a government communications intervention to encourage uptake. DESIGN: A pre-registered randomised controlled trial. METHODS: A large, nationally representative sample were randomly assigned to see one of eight posters. The posters varied by image (general practitioner or two hospital doctors) and message (control with public health guidance not related to vaccination, endorsement of the vaccine from the pictured doctor, endorsement with information about COVID-19 risk, endorsement with information about risk and appeal to get vaccinated to protect friends and family). The posters were presented as part of a larger study. The main outcomes were intention to be vaccinated and how soon people would be willing to be vaccinated. RESULTS: The posters induced different reactions indicating that participants had engaged with them. The hospital image was generally preferred to the GP image. Perhaps critically, all intervention messages were trusted less than a control message which did not mention the vaccine (Control Poster Mean = 5.65, SE = 0.09 vs. Poster M Mean = 5.18, SE = 0.09, p <.001; vs. Poster M + R Mean = 5.11, SE = 0.09, p <.001; vs. Poster M + R + F Mean = 5.33, SE = 0.09, p =.01). There were no effects of poster type on intention to take the vaccine or how soon people were willing to take it. CONCLUSION: Although the intervention messages were based on the strongest correlates of vaccine hesitancy identified by contemporaneous surveys, none was effective. More recent research suggests that focusing on the risk of COVID-19 may be less effective than focusing on the benefits of vaccination. Null findings can be as important as positive findings for designing public health campaigns. This study informed government communications about the COVID-19 vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9108026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91080262022-05-16 Experimental pre-tests of public health communications on the COVID-19 vaccine: A null finding for medical endorsement, risk and altruism Robertson, Deirdre A. Mohr, Kieran S. Barjaková, Martina Lunn, Peter D. Vaccine Article OBJECTIVE: Vaccination campaigns against COVID-19 will only be successful if enough people want to take the vaccine. We tested a government communications intervention to encourage uptake. DESIGN: A pre-registered randomised controlled trial. METHODS: A large, nationally representative sample were randomly assigned to see one of eight posters. The posters varied by image (general practitioner or two hospital doctors) and message (control with public health guidance not related to vaccination, endorsement of the vaccine from the pictured doctor, endorsement with information about COVID-19 risk, endorsement with information about risk and appeal to get vaccinated to protect friends and family). The posters were presented as part of a larger study. The main outcomes were intention to be vaccinated and how soon people would be willing to be vaccinated. RESULTS: The posters induced different reactions indicating that participants had engaged with them. The hospital image was generally preferred to the GP image. Perhaps critically, all intervention messages were trusted less than a control message which did not mention the vaccine (Control Poster Mean = 5.65, SE = 0.09 vs. Poster M Mean = 5.18, SE = 0.09, p <.001; vs. Poster M + R Mean = 5.11, SE = 0.09, p <.001; vs. Poster M + R + F Mean = 5.33, SE = 0.09, p =.01). There were no effects of poster type on intention to take the vaccine or how soon people were willing to take it. CONCLUSION: Although the intervention messages were based on the strongest correlates of vaccine hesitancy identified by contemporaneous surveys, none was effective. More recent research suggests that focusing on the risk of COVID-19 may be less effective than focusing on the benefits of vaccination. Null findings can be as important as positive findings for designing public health campaigns. This study informed government communications about the COVID-19 vaccine. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-06-15 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9108026/ /pubmed/35606238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.029 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Robertson, Deirdre A.
Mohr, Kieran S.
Barjaková, Martina
Lunn, Peter D.
Experimental pre-tests of public health communications on the COVID-19 vaccine: A null finding for medical endorsement, risk and altruism
title Experimental pre-tests of public health communications on the COVID-19 vaccine: A null finding for medical endorsement, risk and altruism
title_full Experimental pre-tests of public health communications on the COVID-19 vaccine: A null finding for medical endorsement, risk and altruism
title_fullStr Experimental pre-tests of public health communications on the COVID-19 vaccine: A null finding for medical endorsement, risk and altruism
title_full_unstemmed Experimental pre-tests of public health communications on the COVID-19 vaccine: A null finding for medical endorsement, risk and altruism
title_short Experimental pre-tests of public health communications on the COVID-19 vaccine: A null finding for medical endorsement, risk and altruism
title_sort experimental pre-tests of public health communications on the covid-19 vaccine: a null finding for medical endorsement, risk and altruism
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.029
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsondeirdrea experimentalpretestsofpublichealthcommunicationsonthecovid19vaccineanullfindingformedicalendorsementriskandaltruism
AT mohrkierans experimentalpretestsofpublichealthcommunicationsonthecovid19vaccineanullfindingformedicalendorsementriskandaltruism
AT barjakovamartina experimentalpretestsofpublichealthcommunicationsonthecovid19vaccineanullfindingformedicalendorsementriskandaltruism
AT lunnpeterd experimentalpretestsofpublichealthcommunicationsonthecovid19vaccineanullfindingformedicalendorsementriskandaltruism