Cargando…
Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer
BACKGROUND: Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology to analyze multiple genes and to guide targeted therapy. Although the pathological diagnosis and biomarker tests for patients with advanced lung cancer have mostly been obtained with small biopsy samples, especial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14411 |
_version_ | 1784708621818396672 |
---|---|
author | Sakaguchi, Tadashi Nishii, Yoichi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Furuhashi, Kazuki Nakamura, Yuki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Katsuta, Koji Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu |
author_facet | Sakaguchi, Tadashi Nishii, Yoichi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Furuhashi, Kazuki Nakamura, Yuki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Katsuta, Koji Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu |
author_sort | Sakaguchi, Tadashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology to analyze multiple genes and to guide targeted therapy. Although the pathological diagnosis and biomarker tests for patients with advanced lung cancer have mostly been obtained with small biopsy samples, especially with bronchoscopic approaches, the performance for NGS with respect to the different sizes of biopsy forceps remains little known. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non‐small cell lung cancer, whose FFPE samples were obtained by endobronchial biopsy/transbronchial biopsy and were submitted for the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT). We compared the analytical performance for ODxTT with respect to the size of biopsy forceps. RESULTS: A total of 103 samples were identified. The success rate of the ODxTT for the group with all samples obtained with small forceps biopsies (70%) was lower than that of the group with some or all samples obtained with standard forceps biopsies (83%), although without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.20). With regard to the reason for unsuccessful analysis, the proportion of the samples which did not pass the nucleic acid concentration threshold in the former group (15%) was higher compared with that of the latter group (4%) (p = 0.08). The proportion of tissue size 4 mm(2) or larger in the former group (70%) was lower than that in the latter group (93%) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The analysis of ODxTT for specimens biopsied using only small forceps is prone to be unsuccessful due to an insufficient amount of nucleic acid. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9108074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91080742022-05-20 Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer Sakaguchi, Tadashi Nishii, Yoichi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Furuhashi, Kazuki Nakamura, Yuki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Katsuta, Koji Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology to analyze multiple genes and to guide targeted therapy. Although the pathological diagnosis and biomarker tests for patients with advanced lung cancer have mostly been obtained with small biopsy samples, especially with bronchoscopic approaches, the performance for NGS with respect to the different sizes of biopsy forceps remains little known. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non‐small cell lung cancer, whose FFPE samples were obtained by endobronchial biopsy/transbronchial biopsy and were submitted for the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT). We compared the analytical performance for ODxTT with respect to the size of biopsy forceps. RESULTS: A total of 103 samples were identified. The success rate of the ODxTT for the group with all samples obtained with small forceps biopsies (70%) was lower than that of the group with some or all samples obtained with standard forceps biopsies (83%), although without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.20). With regard to the reason for unsuccessful analysis, the proportion of the samples which did not pass the nucleic acid concentration threshold in the former group (15%) was higher compared with that of the latter group (4%) (p = 0.08). The proportion of tissue size 4 mm(2) or larger in the former group (70%) was lower than that in the latter group (93%) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The analysis of ODxTT for specimens biopsied using only small forceps is prone to be unsuccessful due to an insufficient amount of nucleic acid. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-04-05 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9108074/ /pubmed/35384314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14411 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sakaguchi, Tadashi Nishii, Yoichi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Furuhashi, Kazuki Nakamura, Yuki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Katsuta, Koji Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer |
title | Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_full | Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_short | Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_sort | comparison of the analytical performance of the oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakaguchitadashi comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT nishiiyoichi comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT iketaniakemi comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT esumiseiya comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT esumimaki comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT furuhashikazuki comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT nakamurayuki comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT suzukiyuta comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT itokentaro comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT fujiwarakentaro comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT katsutakoji comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT taguchiosamu comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT hatajiosamu comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer |