Cargando…

Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology to analyze multiple genes and to guide targeted therapy. Although the pathological diagnosis and biomarker tests for patients with advanced lung cancer have mostly been obtained with small biopsy samples, especial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakaguchi, Tadashi, Nishii, Yoichi, Iketani, Akemi, Esumi, Seiya, Esumi, Maki, Furuhashi, Kazuki, Nakamura, Yuki, Suzuki, Yuta, Ito, Kentaro, Fujiwara, Kentaro, Katsuta, Koji, Taguchi, Osamu, Hataji, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14411
_version_ 1784708621818396672
author Sakaguchi, Tadashi
Nishii, Yoichi
Iketani, Akemi
Esumi, Seiya
Esumi, Maki
Furuhashi, Kazuki
Nakamura, Yuki
Suzuki, Yuta
Ito, Kentaro
Fujiwara, Kentaro
Katsuta, Koji
Taguchi, Osamu
Hataji, Osamu
author_facet Sakaguchi, Tadashi
Nishii, Yoichi
Iketani, Akemi
Esumi, Seiya
Esumi, Maki
Furuhashi, Kazuki
Nakamura, Yuki
Suzuki, Yuta
Ito, Kentaro
Fujiwara, Kentaro
Katsuta, Koji
Taguchi, Osamu
Hataji, Osamu
author_sort Sakaguchi, Tadashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology to analyze multiple genes and to guide targeted therapy. Although the pathological diagnosis and biomarker tests for patients with advanced lung cancer have mostly been obtained with small biopsy samples, especially with bronchoscopic approaches, the performance for NGS with respect to the different sizes of biopsy forceps remains little known. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non‐small cell lung cancer, whose FFPE samples were obtained by endobronchial biopsy/transbronchial biopsy and were submitted for the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT). We compared the analytical performance for ODxTT with respect to the size of biopsy forceps. RESULTS: A total of 103 samples were identified. The success rate of the ODxTT for the group with all samples obtained with small forceps biopsies (70%) was lower than that of the group with some or all samples obtained with standard forceps biopsies (83%), although without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.20). With regard to the reason for unsuccessful analysis, the proportion of the samples which did not pass the nucleic acid concentration threshold in the former group (15%) was higher compared with that of the latter group (4%) (p = 0.08). The proportion of tissue size 4 mm(2) or larger in the former group (70%) was lower than that in the latter group (93%) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The analysis of ODxTT for specimens biopsied using only small forceps is prone to be unsuccessful due to an insufficient amount of nucleic acid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9108074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91080742022-05-20 Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer Sakaguchi, Tadashi Nishii, Yoichi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Furuhashi, Kazuki Nakamura, Yuki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Katsuta, Koji Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology to analyze multiple genes and to guide targeted therapy. Although the pathological diagnosis and biomarker tests for patients with advanced lung cancer have mostly been obtained with small biopsy samples, especially with bronchoscopic approaches, the performance for NGS with respect to the different sizes of biopsy forceps remains little known. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non‐small cell lung cancer, whose FFPE samples were obtained by endobronchial biopsy/transbronchial biopsy and were submitted for the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT). We compared the analytical performance for ODxTT with respect to the size of biopsy forceps. RESULTS: A total of 103 samples were identified. The success rate of the ODxTT for the group with all samples obtained with small forceps biopsies (70%) was lower than that of the group with some or all samples obtained with standard forceps biopsies (83%), although without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.20). With regard to the reason for unsuccessful analysis, the proportion of the samples which did not pass the nucleic acid concentration threshold in the former group (15%) was higher compared with that of the latter group (4%) (p = 0.08). The proportion of tissue size 4 mm(2) or larger in the former group (70%) was lower than that in the latter group (93%) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The analysis of ODxTT for specimens biopsied using only small forceps is prone to be unsuccessful due to an insufficient amount of nucleic acid. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-04-05 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9108074/ /pubmed/35384314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14411 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sakaguchi, Tadashi
Nishii, Yoichi
Iketani, Akemi
Esumi, Seiya
Esumi, Maki
Furuhashi, Kazuki
Nakamura, Yuki
Suzuki, Yuta
Ito, Kentaro
Fujiwara, Kentaro
Katsuta, Koji
Taguchi, Osamu
Hataji, Osamu
Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer
title Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer
title_short Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer
title_sort comparison of the analytical performance of the oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non‐small cell lung cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14411
work_keys_str_mv AT sakaguchitadashi comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nishiiyoichi comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT iketaniakemi comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT esumiseiya comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT esumimaki comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT furuhashikazuki comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nakamurayuki comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT suzukiyuta comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT itokentaro comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT fujiwarakentaro comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT katsutakoji comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT taguchiosamu comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hatajiosamu comparisonoftheanalyticalperformanceoftheoncominedxtargettestfocusingonbronchoscopicbiopsyforcepssizeinnonsmallcelllungcancer