Cargando…

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administered in Two Different Modes Under Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Plastic Surgery

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is now widely used in procedural sedation and analgesia. This study was designed to observe and compare the efficacy and safety of DEX administered in two different modes. METHODS: In total, 100 patients were rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Weipeng, Wang, Shanshan, Wei, Lingxin, Deng, Xiaoming, Yang, Dong, Sui, Jinghu, Liu, Juhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586507
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.836398
_version_ 1784708701205037056
author Xia, Weipeng
Wang, Shanshan
Wei, Lingxin
Deng, Xiaoming
Yang, Dong
Sui, Jinghu
Liu, Juhui
author_facet Xia, Weipeng
Wang, Shanshan
Wei, Lingxin
Deng, Xiaoming
Yang, Dong
Sui, Jinghu
Liu, Juhui
author_sort Xia, Weipeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is now widely used in procedural sedation and analgesia. This study was designed to observe and compare the efficacy and safety of DEX administered in two different modes. METHODS: In total, 100 patients were randomly divided into two groups to receive intravenous DEX 1 µg/kg over 15 min followed by 0.4–0.7 µg/kg/h infusion or DEX 1 µg/kg over 30 min followed by 0.4–0.7 µg/kg/h infusion. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), bispectral index (BIS), Ramsay Sedation Scores (RSS scores), the lowest respiratory rates (LRR), incidences of respiratory adverse events and frequencies of body movements were recorded. Recovery time, recall of intraoperative events, pain scores in PACU and satisfaction of patients and surgeons were assessed. RESULTS: The BIS at time points from 5 min after anesthesia to the end of surgery in the intervention group were significantly higher (p < 0.05). The RSS scores at time points from 5 min after anesthesia to immediately after induction with DEX were significantly higher in the intervention group (p < 0.05). The HR at time points from the beginning of surgery to 30 min after local anesthesia, the MAP at time points from 30 min after local anesthesia to the end of surgery, and the RR at time points from 5 min after anesthesia to the end of surgery were significantly higher in the intervention group (p < 0.05). Patients in the intervention group had higher LRR, lower incidences of respiratory adverse events, and shorter recovery time (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine infused with a loading dose over 30 min had less impact on patients’ hemodynamics and respiration and could shorten the recovery time after anesthesia in procedural sedation and analgesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: ChiCTR1900027958.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9108426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91084262022-05-17 Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administered in Two Different Modes Under Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Plastic Surgery Xia, Weipeng Wang, Shanshan Wei, Lingxin Deng, Xiaoming Yang, Dong Sui, Jinghu Liu, Juhui Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is now widely used in procedural sedation and analgesia. This study was designed to observe and compare the efficacy and safety of DEX administered in two different modes. METHODS: In total, 100 patients were randomly divided into two groups to receive intravenous DEX 1 µg/kg over 15 min followed by 0.4–0.7 µg/kg/h infusion or DEX 1 µg/kg over 30 min followed by 0.4–0.7 µg/kg/h infusion. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), bispectral index (BIS), Ramsay Sedation Scores (RSS scores), the lowest respiratory rates (LRR), incidences of respiratory adverse events and frequencies of body movements were recorded. Recovery time, recall of intraoperative events, pain scores in PACU and satisfaction of patients and surgeons were assessed. RESULTS: The BIS at time points from 5 min after anesthesia to the end of surgery in the intervention group were significantly higher (p < 0.05). The RSS scores at time points from 5 min after anesthesia to immediately after induction with DEX were significantly higher in the intervention group (p < 0.05). The HR at time points from the beginning of surgery to 30 min after local anesthesia, the MAP at time points from 30 min after local anesthesia to the end of surgery, and the RR at time points from 5 min after anesthesia to the end of surgery were significantly higher in the intervention group (p < 0.05). Patients in the intervention group had higher LRR, lower incidences of respiratory adverse events, and shorter recovery time (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine infused with a loading dose over 30 min had less impact on patients’ hemodynamics and respiration and could shorten the recovery time after anesthesia in procedural sedation and analgesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: ChiCTR1900027958. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9108426/ /pubmed/35586507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.836398 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xia, Wang, Wei, Deng, Yang, Sui and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Xia, Weipeng
Wang, Shanshan
Wei, Lingxin
Deng, Xiaoming
Yang, Dong
Sui, Jinghu
Liu, Juhui
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administered in Two Different Modes Under Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Plastic Surgery
title Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administered in Two Different Modes Under Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Plastic Surgery
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administered in Two Different Modes Under Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Plastic Surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administered in Two Different Modes Under Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Plastic Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administered in Two Different Modes Under Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Plastic Surgery
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administered in Two Different Modes Under Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Plastic Surgery
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine administered in two different modes under procedural sedation and analgesia in plastic surgery
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586507
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.836398
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaweipeng comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdexmedetomidineadministeredintwodifferentmodesunderproceduralsedationandanalgesiainplasticsurgery
AT wangshanshan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdexmedetomidineadministeredintwodifferentmodesunderproceduralsedationandanalgesiainplasticsurgery
AT weilingxin comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdexmedetomidineadministeredintwodifferentmodesunderproceduralsedationandanalgesiainplasticsurgery
AT dengxiaoming comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdexmedetomidineadministeredintwodifferentmodesunderproceduralsedationandanalgesiainplasticsurgery
AT yangdong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdexmedetomidineadministeredintwodifferentmodesunderproceduralsedationandanalgesiainplasticsurgery
AT suijinghu comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdexmedetomidineadministeredintwodifferentmodesunderproceduralsedationandanalgesiainplasticsurgery
AT liujuhui comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdexmedetomidineadministeredintwodifferentmodesunderproceduralsedationandanalgesiainplasticsurgery