Cargando…
Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting
OBJECTIVE: To estimate scent dogs’ diagnostic accuracy in identification of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We conducted a randomised triple-blinded validation trial, and a real-life study at the Helsinki-Vantaa Internation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008024 |
_version_ | 1784708703617810432 |
---|---|
author | Kantele, Anu Paajanen, Juuso Turunen, Soile Pakkanen, Sari H Patjas, Anu Itkonen, Laura Heiskanen, Elina Lappalainen, Maija Desquilbet, Loic Vapalahti, Olli Hielm-Björkman, Anna |
author_facet | Kantele, Anu Paajanen, Juuso Turunen, Soile Pakkanen, Sari H Patjas, Anu Itkonen, Laura Heiskanen, Elina Lappalainen, Maija Desquilbet, Loic Vapalahti, Olli Hielm-Björkman, Anna |
author_sort | Kantele, Anu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To estimate scent dogs’ diagnostic accuracy in identification of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We conducted a randomised triple-blinded validation trial, and a real-life study at the Helsinki-Vantaa International Airport, Finland. METHODS: Four dogs were trained to detect COVID-19 using skin swabs from individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Our controlled triple-blinded validation study comprised four identical sets of 420 parallel samples (from 114 individuals tested positive and 306 negative by RT-PCR), randomly presented to each dog over seven trial sessions. In a real-life setting the dogs screened skin swabs from 303 incoming passengers all concomitantly examined by nasal swab SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Our main outcomes were variables of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) for scent dog identification in comparison with RT-PCR. RESULTS: Our validation experiments had an overall accuracy of 92% (95% CI 90% to 93%), a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI 89% to 94%) and a specificity of 91% (95% CI 89% to 93%) compared with RT-PCR. For our dogs, trained using the wild-type virus, performance was less accurate for the alpha variant (89% for confirmed wild-type vs 36% for alpha variant, OR 14.0, 95% CI 4.5 to 43.4). In the real-life setting, scent detection and RT-PCR matched 98.7% of the negative swabs. Scant airport prevalence (0.47%) did not allow sensitivity testing; our only SARS-CoV-2 positive swab was not identified (alpha variant). However, ad hoc analysis including predefined positive spike samples showed a total accuracy of 98% (95% CI 97% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS: This large randomised controlled triple-blinded validation study with a precalculated sample size conducted at an international airport showed that trained scent dogs screen airport passenger samples with high accuracy. One of our findings highlights the importance of continuous retraining as new variants emerge. Using scent dogs may present a valuable approach for high-throughput, rapid screening of large numbers of people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9108438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91084382022-05-17 Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting Kantele, Anu Paajanen, Juuso Turunen, Soile Pakkanen, Sari H Patjas, Anu Itkonen, Laura Heiskanen, Elina Lappalainen, Maija Desquilbet, Loic Vapalahti, Olli Hielm-Björkman, Anna BMJ Glob Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: To estimate scent dogs’ diagnostic accuracy in identification of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We conducted a randomised triple-blinded validation trial, and a real-life study at the Helsinki-Vantaa International Airport, Finland. METHODS: Four dogs were trained to detect COVID-19 using skin swabs from individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Our controlled triple-blinded validation study comprised four identical sets of 420 parallel samples (from 114 individuals tested positive and 306 negative by RT-PCR), randomly presented to each dog over seven trial sessions. In a real-life setting the dogs screened skin swabs from 303 incoming passengers all concomitantly examined by nasal swab SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Our main outcomes were variables of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) for scent dog identification in comparison with RT-PCR. RESULTS: Our validation experiments had an overall accuracy of 92% (95% CI 90% to 93%), a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI 89% to 94%) and a specificity of 91% (95% CI 89% to 93%) compared with RT-PCR. For our dogs, trained using the wild-type virus, performance was less accurate for the alpha variant (89% for confirmed wild-type vs 36% for alpha variant, OR 14.0, 95% CI 4.5 to 43.4). In the real-life setting, scent detection and RT-PCR matched 98.7% of the negative swabs. Scant airport prevalence (0.47%) did not allow sensitivity testing; our only SARS-CoV-2 positive swab was not identified (alpha variant). However, ad hoc analysis including predefined positive spike samples showed a total accuracy of 98% (95% CI 97% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS: This large randomised controlled triple-blinded validation study with a precalculated sample size conducted at an international airport showed that trained scent dogs screen airport passenger samples with high accuracy. One of our findings highlights the importance of continuous retraining as new variants emerge. Using scent dogs may present a valuable approach for high-throughput, rapid screening of large numbers of people. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9108438/ /pubmed/35577391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008024 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kantele, Anu Paajanen, Juuso Turunen, Soile Pakkanen, Sari H Patjas, Anu Itkonen, Laura Heiskanen, Elina Lappalainen, Maija Desquilbet, Loic Vapalahti, Olli Hielm-Björkman, Anna Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting |
title | Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting |
title_full | Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting |
title_fullStr | Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting |
title_short | Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting |
title_sort | scent dogs in detection of covid-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanteleanu scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT paajanenjuuso scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT turunensoile scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT pakkanensarih scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT patjasanu scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT itkonenlaura scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT heiskanenelina scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT lappalainenmaija scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT desquilbetloic scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT vapalahtiolli scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting AT hielmbjorkmananna scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting |