Cargando…

Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting

OBJECTIVE: To estimate scent dogs’ diagnostic accuracy in identification of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We conducted a randomised triple-blinded validation trial, and a real-life study at the Helsinki-Vantaa Internation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kantele, Anu, Paajanen, Juuso, Turunen, Soile, Pakkanen, Sari H, Patjas, Anu, Itkonen, Laura, Heiskanen, Elina, Lappalainen, Maija, Desquilbet, Loic, Vapalahti, Olli, Hielm-Björkman, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008024
_version_ 1784708703617810432
author Kantele, Anu
Paajanen, Juuso
Turunen, Soile
Pakkanen, Sari H
Patjas, Anu
Itkonen, Laura
Heiskanen, Elina
Lappalainen, Maija
Desquilbet, Loic
Vapalahti, Olli
Hielm-Björkman, Anna
author_facet Kantele, Anu
Paajanen, Juuso
Turunen, Soile
Pakkanen, Sari H
Patjas, Anu
Itkonen, Laura
Heiskanen, Elina
Lappalainen, Maija
Desquilbet, Loic
Vapalahti, Olli
Hielm-Björkman, Anna
author_sort Kantele, Anu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate scent dogs’ diagnostic accuracy in identification of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We conducted a randomised triple-blinded validation trial, and a real-life study at the Helsinki-Vantaa International Airport, Finland. METHODS: Four dogs were trained to detect COVID-19 using skin swabs from individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Our controlled triple-blinded validation study comprised four identical sets of 420 parallel samples (from 114 individuals tested positive and 306 negative by RT-PCR), randomly presented to each dog over seven trial sessions. In a real-life setting the dogs screened skin swabs from 303 incoming passengers all concomitantly examined by nasal swab SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Our main outcomes were variables of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) for scent dog identification in comparison with RT-PCR. RESULTS: Our validation experiments had an overall accuracy of 92% (95% CI 90% to 93%), a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI 89% to 94%) and a specificity of 91% (95% CI 89% to 93%) compared with RT-PCR. For our dogs, trained using the wild-type virus, performance was less accurate for the alpha variant (89% for confirmed wild-type vs 36% for alpha variant, OR 14.0, 95% CI 4.5 to 43.4). In the real-life setting, scent detection and RT-PCR matched 98.7% of the negative swabs. Scant airport prevalence (0.47%) did not allow sensitivity testing; our only SARS-CoV-2 positive swab was not identified (alpha variant). However, ad hoc analysis including predefined positive spike samples showed a total accuracy of 98% (95% CI 97% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS: This large randomised controlled triple-blinded validation study with a precalculated sample size conducted at an international airport showed that trained scent dogs screen airport passenger samples with high accuracy. One of our findings highlights the importance of continuous retraining as new variants emerge. Using scent dogs may present a valuable approach for high-throughput, rapid screening of large numbers of people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9108438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91084382022-05-17 Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting Kantele, Anu Paajanen, Juuso Turunen, Soile Pakkanen, Sari H Patjas, Anu Itkonen, Laura Heiskanen, Elina Lappalainen, Maija Desquilbet, Loic Vapalahti, Olli Hielm-Björkman, Anna BMJ Glob Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: To estimate scent dogs’ diagnostic accuracy in identification of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We conducted a randomised triple-blinded validation trial, and a real-life study at the Helsinki-Vantaa International Airport, Finland. METHODS: Four dogs were trained to detect COVID-19 using skin swabs from individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Our controlled triple-blinded validation study comprised four identical sets of 420 parallel samples (from 114 individuals tested positive and 306 negative by RT-PCR), randomly presented to each dog over seven trial sessions. In a real-life setting the dogs screened skin swabs from 303 incoming passengers all concomitantly examined by nasal swab SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Our main outcomes were variables of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) for scent dog identification in comparison with RT-PCR. RESULTS: Our validation experiments had an overall accuracy of 92% (95% CI 90% to 93%), a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI 89% to 94%) and a specificity of 91% (95% CI 89% to 93%) compared with RT-PCR. For our dogs, trained using the wild-type virus, performance was less accurate for the alpha variant (89% for confirmed wild-type vs 36% for alpha variant, OR 14.0, 95% CI 4.5 to 43.4). In the real-life setting, scent detection and RT-PCR matched 98.7% of the negative swabs. Scant airport prevalence (0.47%) did not allow sensitivity testing; our only SARS-CoV-2 positive swab was not identified (alpha variant). However, ad hoc analysis including predefined positive spike samples showed a total accuracy of 98% (95% CI 97% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS: This large randomised controlled triple-blinded validation study with a precalculated sample size conducted at an international airport showed that trained scent dogs screen airport passenger samples with high accuracy. One of our findings highlights the importance of continuous retraining as new variants emerge. Using scent dogs may present a valuable approach for high-throughput, rapid screening of large numbers of people. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9108438/ /pubmed/35577391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008024 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Kantele, Anu
Paajanen, Juuso
Turunen, Soile
Pakkanen, Sari H
Patjas, Anu
Itkonen, Laura
Heiskanen, Elina
Lappalainen, Maija
Desquilbet, Loic
Vapalahti, Olli
Hielm-Björkman, Anna
Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting
title Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting
title_full Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting
title_fullStr Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting
title_full_unstemmed Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting
title_short Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting
title_sort scent dogs in detection of covid-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008024
work_keys_str_mv AT kanteleanu scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT paajanenjuuso scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT turunensoile scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT pakkanensarih scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT patjasanu scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT itkonenlaura scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT heiskanenelina scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT lappalainenmaija scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT desquilbetloic scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT vapalahtiolli scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting
AT hielmbjorkmananna scentdogsindetectionofcovid19tripleblindedrandomisedtrialandoperationalreallifescreeninginairportsetting