Cargando…
Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate image quality of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in contrast-enhanced renal and adrenal computed tomography (CT) compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V). METHODS: We prospectively recruited 52 patients. All images were reconstru...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35124575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/XST-211105 |
_version_ | 1784708733162487808 |
---|---|
author | Bie, Yifan Yang, Shuo Li, Xingchao Zhao, Kun Zhang, Changlei Zhong, Hai |
author_facet | Bie, Yifan Yang, Shuo Li, Xingchao Zhao, Kun Zhang, Changlei Zhong, Hai |
author_sort | Bie, Yifan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate image quality of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in contrast-enhanced renal and adrenal computed tomography (CT) compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V). METHODS: We prospectively recruited 52 patients. All images were reconstructed with ASiR-V 30%, ASiR-V 70%, and DLIR at low, medium, and high reconstruction strengths. CT number, noise, noise reduction rate, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured and calculated within the region of interest (ROI) on subcutaneous fat, bilateral renal cortices, renal medulla, renal arteries, and adrenal glands. For qualitative analyses, the differentiation of the renal cortex and medulla, conspicuity of the adrenal gland boundary, sharpness, artifacts, and subjective noise were assessed. The overall image quality was calculated on a scale from 0 (worst) to 15 (best) based on the five values above and the score≥9 was acceptable. RESULTS: CT number does not significantly differ between the reconstruction datasets. Noise does not significantly differ between ASiR-V 30% and DLIR-L, but it is significantly lower using ASiR-V 70%, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H. The noise reduction rate relative to ASiR-V 30% is significantly different between the DLIR groups and ASiR-V 70%, and DLIR-H yields the highest noise reduction rate (61.6%). SNR and CNR are higher for DLIR-M, DLIR-H, and ASiR-V 70% than for ASiR-V 30% and DLIR-L. DLIR-H shows the best SNR and CNR. The overall image quality yields the same pattern for DLIR-H, with the highest score. Percentages of cases with overall image quality score≥9 are 100% (DLIR-H), 94.23% (DLIR-M), 90.38% (ASiR-V70%), 67.31% (DLIR-L), and 63.46% (ASiR-V30%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DLIR significantly improved the objective and subjective image quality of renal and adrenal CTs, yielding superior noise reduction compared with ASiR-V. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9108564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91085642022-05-18 Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography Bie, Yifan Yang, Shuo Li, Xingchao Zhao, Kun Zhang, Changlei Zhong, Hai J Xray Sci Technol Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate image quality of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in contrast-enhanced renal and adrenal computed tomography (CT) compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V). METHODS: We prospectively recruited 52 patients. All images were reconstructed with ASiR-V 30%, ASiR-V 70%, and DLIR at low, medium, and high reconstruction strengths. CT number, noise, noise reduction rate, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured and calculated within the region of interest (ROI) on subcutaneous fat, bilateral renal cortices, renal medulla, renal arteries, and adrenal glands. For qualitative analyses, the differentiation of the renal cortex and medulla, conspicuity of the adrenal gland boundary, sharpness, artifacts, and subjective noise were assessed. The overall image quality was calculated on a scale from 0 (worst) to 15 (best) based on the five values above and the score≥9 was acceptable. RESULTS: CT number does not significantly differ between the reconstruction datasets. Noise does not significantly differ between ASiR-V 30% and DLIR-L, but it is significantly lower using ASiR-V 70%, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H. The noise reduction rate relative to ASiR-V 30% is significantly different between the DLIR groups and ASiR-V 70%, and DLIR-H yields the highest noise reduction rate (61.6%). SNR and CNR are higher for DLIR-M, DLIR-H, and ASiR-V 70% than for ASiR-V 30% and DLIR-L. DLIR-H shows the best SNR and CNR. The overall image quality yields the same pattern for DLIR-H, with the highest score. Percentages of cases with overall image quality score≥9 are 100% (DLIR-H), 94.23% (DLIR-M), 90.38% (ASiR-V70%), 67.31% (DLIR-L), and 63.46% (ASiR-V30%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DLIR significantly improved the objective and subjective image quality of renal and adrenal CTs, yielding superior noise reduction compared with ASiR-V. IOS Press 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9108564/ /pubmed/35124575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/XST-211105 Text en © 2022 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bie, Yifan Yang, Shuo Li, Xingchao Zhao, Kun Zhang, Changlei Zhong, Hai Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography |
title | Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography |
title_full | Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography |
title_short | Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography |
title_sort | impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35124575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/XST-211105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bieyifan impactofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructiononimagequalitycomparedwithadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionveoinrenalandadrenalcomputedtomography AT yangshuo impactofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructiononimagequalitycomparedwithadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionveoinrenalandadrenalcomputedtomography AT lixingchao impactofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructiononimagequalitycomparedwithadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionveoinrenalandadrenalcomputedtomography AT zhaokun impactofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructiononimagequalitycomparedwithadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionveoinrenalandadrenalcomputedtomography AT zhangchanglei impactofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructiononimagequalitycomparedwithadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionveoinrenalandadrenalcomputedtomography AT zhonghai impactofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructiononimagequalitycomparedwithadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionveoinrenalandadrenalcomputedtomography |