Cargando…

Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Management of children has always been a challenging task in the dental office, as many children exhibit extreme fear, apprehension, and anxiety toward dental procedures. Pharmacological means of behavior management such as sedation are now at the forefront. Midazolam and nitrous oxide a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srinivasan, Navaneetha Krishnan, Karunagaran, Pradeep, Panchal, Veerale, Subramanian, EMG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645472
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2085
_version_ 1784708782028226560
author Srinivasan, Navaneetha Krishnan
Karunagaran, Pradeep
Panchal, Veerale
Subramanian, EMG
author_facet Srinivasan, Navaneetha Krishnan
Karunagaran, Pradeep
Panchal, Veerale
Subramanian, EMG
author_sort Srinivasan, Navaneetha Krishnan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Management of children has always been a challenging task in the dental office, as many children exhibit extreme fear, apprehension, and anxiety toward dental procedures. Pharmacological means of behavior management such as sedation are now at the forefront. Midazolam and nitrous oxide are the commonly employed pharmacological agents for sedation in pediatric dentistry. Though each route has its advantages and disadvantages, we compared the effect of atomized intranasal midazolam (dosage 0.3 mg/kg body weight) and nitrous oxide oxygen sedation in evaluating the behavior of child, pain experienced during local anesthesia administration, sedation level, and patient's acceptance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 (n = 35) anxious pediatric patients aged 4-7 years with negative and definitely negative behavioral rating were randomized to receive intranasal midazolam and inhalational nitrous oxide through mask. The overall behavior, alertness, and cry were recorded using Houpt rating scale while pain and sedation were assessed by face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) and Ellis sedation scores, respectively. RESULTS: The children who received intranasal midazolam sedation were calm, had less adverse effects, and had better acceptance of the drug. Both the techniques of sedation were found to be equally effective in terms overall behavior rating. CONCLUSION: Intranasal midazolam was found to be as effective as nitrous oxide sedation for controlling behavior and providing adequate sedation in pediatric dental patients. It can also be an effective alternative for anxious patients who are unable to maintain the nitrous oxide mask throughout the dental procedure. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Srinivasan NK, Karunagaran P, Panchal V, et al. Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(S-2):S111-S116.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9108794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91087942022-05-27 Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Srinivasan, Navaneetha Krishnan Karunagaran, Pradeep Panchal, Veerale Subramanian, EMG Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article BACKGROUND: Management of children has always been a challenging task in the dental office, as many children exhibit extreme fear, apprehension, and anxiety toward dental procedures. Pharmacological means of behavior management such as sedation are now at the forefront. Midazolam and nitrous oxide are the commonly employed pharmacological agents for sedation in pediatric dentistry. Though each route has its advantages and disadvantages, we compared the effect of atomized intranasal midazolam (dosage 0.3 mg/kg body weight) and nitrous oxide oxygen sedation in evaluating the behavior of child, pain experienced during local anesthesia administration, sedation level, and patient's acceptance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 (n = 35) anxious pediatric patients aged 4-7 years with negative and definitely negative behavioral rating were randomized to receive intranasal midazolam and inhalational nitrous oxide through mask. The overall behavior, alertness, and cry were recorded using Houpt rating scale while pain and sedation were assessed by face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) and Ellis sedation scores, respectively. RESULTS: The children who received intranasal midazolam sedation were calm, had less adverse effects, and had better acceptance of the drug. Both the techniques of sedation were found to be equally effective in terms overall behavior rating. CONCLUSION: Intranasal midazolam was found to be as effective as nitrous oxide sedation for controlling behavior and providing adequate sedation in pediatric dental patients. It can also be an effective alternative for anxious patients who are unable to maintain the nitrous oxide mask throughout the dental procedure. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Srinivasan NK, Karunagaran P, Panchal V, et al. Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(S-2):S111-S116. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC9108794/ /pubmed/35645472 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2085 Text en Copyright © 2021; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Srinivasan, Navaneetha Krishnan
Karunagaran, Pradeep
Panchal, Veerale
Subramanian, EMG
Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of the sedative effect of inhaled nitrous oxide and intranasal midazolam in behavior management and pain perception of pediatric patients: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645472
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2085
work_keys_str_mv AT srinivasannavaneethakrishnan comparisonofthesedativeeffectofinhalednitrousoxideandintranasalmidazolaminbehaviormanagementandpainperceptionofpediatricpatientsasplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT karunagaranpradeep comparisonofthesedativeeffectofinhalednitrousoxideandintranasalmidazolaminbehaviormanagementandpainperceptionofpediatricpatientsasplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT panchalveerale comparisonofthesedativeeffectofinhalednitrousoxideandintranasalmidazolaminbehaviormanagementandpainperceptionofpediatricpatientsasplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT subramanianemg comparisonofthesedativeeffectofinhalednitrousoxideandintranasalmidazolaminbehaviormanagementandpainperceptionofpediatricpatientsasplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial