Cargando…
Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial
AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of propolis as pulpotomy medicament in human primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial is a two-arm, parallel group study with blinded outcome assessment. The study included a total of 60 primary molars that require p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645503 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2120 |
_version_ | 1784708786288590848 |
---|---|
author | RojaRamya, Kakarla Sri Chandrasekhar, Rayala Uloopi, KS Vinay, C |
author_facet | RojaRamya, Kakarla Sri Chandrasekhar, Rayala Uloopi, KS Vinay, C |
author_sort | RojaRamya, Kakarla Sri |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of propolis as pulpotomy medicament in human primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial is a two-arm, parallel group study with blinded outcome assessment. The study included a total of 60 primary molars that require pulpotomy treatment in 4- 8-year old children. Teeth were assigned to two groups randomly: Propolis (Test group); Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Control group). All the pulpotomized teeth were given stainless steel crowns and the teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 6, 12, and 24 months to grade them as either success or failure. Chi-square test was employed to analyze the data. RESULTS: Success rates of pulpotomy with propolis and MTA were 80% and 93.1% respectively at 24 months of follow-up interval. Propolis has shown success rates of 90% and 80% at 6- and 12-month follow-up, while MTA has shown a consistent success rate of 93.1% at all the follow-up intervals. The difference in success rate between the groups at all the time intervals is statistically nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: Propolis has demonstrated a clinically acceptable success rate comparable to MTA as pulpotomy medicament in primary teeth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Biocompatible materials with regenerative potential have drawn the momentum in vital pulp therapy. In this regard, MTA has been emerged as most successful material, but its high cost has limited its use. Hence, there is an absolute need of cost-effective pulpotomy material with regenerative potential. This study provides an evidence that propolis has clinically acceptable success rate as pulpotomy medicament. Considering its low cost and ready availability, it can be recommended as a cost-effective alternative for primary teeth pulpotomy. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: RojaRamya KS, Chandrasekhar R, Uloopi KS, et al. Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(S-1):S3-S7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9108812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91088122022-05-27 Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial RojaRamya, Kakarla Sri Chandrasekhar, Rayala Uloopi, KS Vinay, C Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of propolis as pulpotomy medicament in human primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial is a two-arm, parallel group study with blinded outcome assessment. The study included a total of 60 primary molars that require pulpotomy treatment in 4- 8-year old children. Teeth were assigned to two groups randomly: Propolis (Test group); Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Control group). All the pulpotomized teeth were given stainless steel crowns and the teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 6, 12, and 24 months to grade them as either success or failure. Chi-square test was employed to analyze the data. RESULTS: Success rates of pulpotomy with propolis and MTA were 80% and 93.1% respectively at 24 months of follow-up interval. Propolis has shown success rates of 90% and 80% at 6- and 12-month follow-up, while MTA has shown a consistent success rate of 93.1% at all the follow-up intervals. The difference in success rate between the groups at all the time intervals is statistically nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: Propolis has demonstrated a clinically acceptable success rate comparable to MTA as pulpotomy medicament in primary teeth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Biocompatible materials with regenerative potential have drawn the momentum in vital pulp therapy. In this regard, MTA has been emerged as most successful material, but its high cost has limited its use. Hence, there is an absolute need of cost-effective pulpotomy material with regenerative potential. This study provides an evidence that propolis has clinically acceptable success rate as pulpotomy medicament. Considering its low cost and ready availability, it can be recommended as a cost-effective alternative for primary teeth pulpotomy. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: RojaRamya KS, Chandrasekhar R, Uloopi KS, et al. Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(S-1):S3-S7. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9108812/ /pubmed/35645503 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2120 Text en Copyright © 2022; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article RojaRamya, Kakarla Sri Chandrasekhar, Rayala Uloopi, KS Vinay, C Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy with Propolis in Comparison with MTA in Human Primary Molars: A 24-month Follow-up Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | treatment outcomes of pulpotomy with propolis in comparison with mta in human primary molars: a 24-month follow-up randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645503 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rojaramyakakarlasri treatmentoutcomesofpulpotomywithpropolisincomparisonwithmtainhumanprimarymolarsa24monthfollowuprandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chandrasekharrayala treatmentoutcomesofpulpotomywithpropolisincomparisonwithmtainhumanprimarymolarsa24monthfollowuprandomizedcontrolledtrial AT uloopiks treatmentoutcomesofpulpotomywithpropolisincomparisonwithmtainhumanprimarymolarsa24monthfollowuprandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vinayc treatmentoutcomesofpulpotomywithpropolisincomparisonwithmtainhumanprimarymolarsa24monthfollowuprandomizedcontrolledtrial |