Cargando…
Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that immobilisation is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, patients hospitalised in general internal medicine (GIM) wards spend up to 50% of time in bed. Previous studies in selected patient populations showed increased mobility after implementation of goal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35551091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058509 |
_version_ | 1784708835253944320 |
---|---|
author | Liechti, Fabian D Heinzmann, Jeannelle Schmidt Leuenberger, Joachim M Limacher, Andreas Wertli, Maria M Verra, Martin L |
author_facet | Liechti, Fabian D Heinzmann, Jeannelle Schmidt Leuenberger, Joachim M Limacher, Andreas Wertli, Maria M Verra, Martin L |
author_sort | Liechti, Fabian D |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that immobilisation is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, patients hospitalised in general internal medicine (GIM) wards spend up to 50% of time in bed. Previous studies in selected patient populations showed increased mobility after implementation of goal-directed mobilisation (GDM). Due to the study design used so far, the degree of evidence is generally low. The effect of GDM on clinical outcomes and economically relevant indicators in patients hospitalised in GIM wards is currently unknown. This study aims to evaluate a GDM intervention compared to standard care on physical activity (de Morton Mobility Index, DEMMI) in medical inpatients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: GoMob-in is a randomised, controlled, open-label study with blinded outcome assessment. We plan to enrol 160 inpatients with indication for physiotherapy on GIM wards of a tertiary hospital in Bern, Switzerland. Adult patients newly hospitalised on GIM wards will be included in the study. The primary outcome will be the change in the DEMMI score between baseline and 5 days. Secondary outcomes are change of DEMMI (inclusion to hospital discharge), mobilisation time (inclusion to day 5, inclusion to discharge), in-hospital delirium episodes, number of in-hospital falls, length of stay, number of falls within 3 months, number of re-hospitalisations and all-cause mortality within 3 months, change in independence during activities of daily living, concerns of falling, and quality of life within 3 months and destination after 3 months. Patients in the intervention group will be attributed a regularly updated individual mobility goal level made visible for all stakeholders and get a short educational intervention on GDM. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2020–02305). Written informed consent will be obtained from participants before study inclusion. Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04760392. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9109085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91090852022-05-27 Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial Liechti, Fabian D Heinzmann, Jeannelle Schmidt Leuenberger, Joachim M Limacher, Andreas Wertli, Maria M Verra, Martin L BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that immobilisation is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, patients hospitalised in general internal medicine (GIM) wards spend up to 50% of time in bed. Previous studies in selected patient populations showed increased mobility after implementation of goal-directed mobilisation (GDM). Due to the study design used so far, the degree of evidence is generally low. The effect of GDM on clinical outcomes and economically relevant indicators in patients hospitalised in GIM wards is currently unknown. This study aims to evaluate a GDM intervention compared to standard care on physical activity (de Morton Mobility Index, DEMMI) in medical inpatients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: GoMob-in is a randomised, controlled, open-label study with blinded outcome assessment. We plan to enrol 160 inpatients with indication for physiotherapy on GIM wards of a tertiary hospital in Bern, Switzerland. Adult patients newly hospitalised on GIM wards will be included in the study. The primary outcome will be the change in the DEMMI score between baseline and 5 days. Secondary outcomes are change of DEMMI (inclusion to hospital discharge), mobilisation time (inclusion to day 5, inclusion to discharge), in-hospital delirium episodes, number of in-hospital falls, length of stay, number of falls within 3 months, number of re-hospitalisations and all-cause mortality within 3 months, change in independence during activities of daily living, concerns of falling, and quality of life within 3 months and destination after 3 months. Patients in the intervention group will be attributed a regularly updated individual mobility goal level made visible for all stakeholders and get a short educational intervention on GDM. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2020–02305). Written informed consent will be obtained from participants before study inclusion. Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04760392. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9109085/ /pubmed/35551091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058509 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Geriatric Medicine Liechti, Fabian D Heinzmann, Jeannelle Schmidt Leuenberger, Joachim M Limacher, Andreas Wertli, Maria M Verra, Martin L Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial |
title | Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the gomob-in randomised controlled trial |
topic | Geriatric Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35551091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liechtifabiand effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heinzmannjeannelle effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schmidtleuenbergerjoachimm effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT limacherandreas effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wertlimariam effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT verramartinl effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial |