Cargando…

Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that immobilisation is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, patients hospitalised in general internal medicine (GIM) wards spend up to 50% of time in bed. Previous studies in selected patient populations showed increased mobility after implementation of goal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liechti, Fabian D, Heinzmann, Jeannelle, Schmidt Leuenberger, Joachim M, Limacher, Andreas, Wertli, Maria M, Verra, Martin L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35551091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058509
_version_ 1784708835253944320
author Liechti, Fabian D
Heinzmann, Jeannelle
Schmidt Leuenberger, Joachim M
Limacher, Andreas
Wertli, Maria M
Verra, Martin L
author_facet Liechti, Fabian D
Heinzmann, Jeannelle
Schmidt Leuenberger, Joachim M
Limacher, Andreas
Wertli, Maria M
Verra, Martin L
author_sort Liechti, Fabian D
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that immobilisation is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, patients hospitalised in general internal medicine (GIM) wards spend up to 50% of time in bed. Previous studies in selected patient populations showed increased mobility after implementation of goal-directed mobilisation (GDM). Due to the study design used so far, the degree of evidence is generally low. The effect of GDM on clinical outcomes and economically relevant indicators in patients hospitalised in GIM wards is currently unknown. This study aims to evaluate a GDM intervention compared to standard care on physical activity (de Morton Mobility Index, DEMMI) in medical inpatients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: GoMob-in is a randomised, controlled, open-label study with blinded outcome assessment. We plan to enrol 160 inpatients with indication for physiotherapy on GIM wards of a tertiary hospital in Bern, Switzerland. Adult patients newly hospitalised on GIM wards will be included in the study. The primary outcome will be the change in the DEMMI score between baseline and 5 days. Secondary outcomes are change of DEMMI (inclusion to hospital discharge), mobilisation time (inclusion to day 5, inclusion to discharge), in-hospital delirium episodes, number of in-hospital falls, length of stay, number of falls within 3 months, number of re-hospitalisations and all-cause mortality within 3 months, change in independence during activities of daily living, concerns of falling, and quality of life within 3 months and destination after 3 months. Patients in the intervention group will be attributed a regularly updated individual mobility goal level made visible for all stakeholders and get a short educational intervention on GDM. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2020–02305). Written informed consent will be obtained from participants before study inclusion. Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04760392.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9109085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91090852022-05-27 Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial Liechti, Fabian D Heinzmann, Jeannelle Schmidt Leuenberger, Joachim M Limacher, Andreas Wertli, Maria M Verra, Martin L BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that immobilisation is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, patients hospitalised in general internal medicine (GIM) wards spend up to 50% of time in bed. Previous studies in selected patient populations showed increased mobility after implementation of goal-directed mobilisation (GDM). Due to the study design used so far, the degree of evidence is generally low. The effect of GDM on clinical outcomes and economically relevant indicators in patients hospitalised in GIM wards is currently unknown. This study aims to evaluate a GDM intervention compared to standard care on physical activity (de Morton Mobility Index, DEMMI) in medical inpatients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: GoMob-in is a randomised, controlled, open-label study with blinded outcome assessment. We plan to enrol 160 inpatients with indication for physiotherapy on GIM wards of a tertiary hospital in Bern, Switzerland. Adult patients newly hospitalised on GIM wards will be included in the study. The primary outcome will be the change in the DEMMI score between baseline and 5 days. Secondary outcomes are change of DEMMI (inclusion to hospital discharge), mobilisation time (inclusion to day 5, inclusion to discharge), in-hospital delirium episodes, number of in-hospital falls, length of stay, number of falls within 3 months, number of re-hospitalisations and all-cause mortality within 3 months, change in independence during activities of daily living, concerns of falling, and quality of life within 3 months and destination after 3 months. Patients in the intervention group will be attributed a regularly updated individual mobility goal level made visible for all stakeholders and get a short educational intervention on GDM. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2020–02305). Written informed consent will be obtained from participants before study inclusion. Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04760392. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9109085/ /pubmed/35551091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058509 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Liechti, Fabian D
Heinzmann, Jeannelle
Schmidt Leuenberger, Joachim M
Limacher, Andreas
Wertli, Maria M
Verra, Martin L
Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial
title Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial
title_full Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial
title_short Effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the GoMob-in randomised controlled trial
title_sort effect of goal-directed mobilisation intervention compared with standard care on physical activity among medical inpatients: protocol for the gomob-in randomised controlled trial
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35551091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058509
work_keys_str_mv AT liechtifabiand effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT heinzmannjeannelle effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schmidtleuenbergerjoachimm effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT limacherandreas effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wertlimariam effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT verramartinl effectofgoaldirectedmobilisationinterventioncomparedwithstandardcareonphysicalactivityamongmedicalinpatientsprotocolforthegomobinrandomisedcontrolledtrial