Why STAR Protocols authors make excellent protocol reviewers

When researchers submit a protocol for peer review and publication, they receive feedback from reviewers to help improve the usability of the protocol. These authors can be the perfect peer reviewers helping propel research forward. They can use their technical expertise and sharpened writing skills...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blot, Guillaume, Shokri, Leila, Buttery, Shawnna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Backstory
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101395
_version_ 1784708853257994240
author Blot, Guillaume
Shokri, Leila
Buttery, Shawnna
author_facet Blot, Guillaume
Shokri, Leila
Buttery, Shawnna
author_sort Blot, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description When researchers submit a protocol for peer review and publication, they receive feedback from reviewers to help improve the usability of the protocol. These authors can be the perfect peer reviewers helping propel research forward. They can use their technical expertise and sharpened writing skills to help improve the main aspects of published protocols, namely their clarity and reproducibility. This backstory chronicles the journey of Dr. Guillaume Blot, from a junior researcher and author to a protocol reviewer. For complete details, please refer to Blot et al. (2021).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9109189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91091892022-05-17 Why STAR Protocols authors make excellent protocol reviewers Blot, Guillaume Shokri, Leila Buttery, Shawnna STAR Protoc Backstory When researchers submit a protocol for peer review and publication, they receive feedback from reviewers to help improve the usability of the protocol. These authors can be the perfect peer reviewers helping propel research forward. They can use their technical expertise and sharpened writing skills to help improve the main aspects of published protocols, namely their clarity and reproducibility. This backstory chronicles the journey of Dr. Guillaume Blot, from a junior researcher and author to a protocol reviewer. For complete details, please refer to Blot et al. (2021). Elsevier 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9109189/ /pubmed/35586314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101395 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Backstory
Blot, Guillaume
Shokri, Leila
Buttery, Shawnna
Why STAR Protocols authors make excellent protocol reviewers
title Why STAR Protocols authors make excellent protocol reviewers
title_full Why STAR Protocols authors make excellent protocol reviewers
title_fullStr Why STAR Protocols authors make excellent protocol reviewers
title_full_unstemmed Why STAR Protocols authors make excellent protocol reviewers
title_short Why STAR Protocols authors make excellent protocol reviewers
title_sort why star protocols authors make excellent protocol reviewers
topic Backstory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101395
work_keys_str_mv AT blotguillaume whystarprotocolsauthorsmakeexcellentprotocolreviewers
AT shokrileila whystarprotocolsauthorsmakeexcellentprotocolreviewers
AT butteryshawnna whystarprotocolsauthorsmakeexcellentprotocolreviewers

Ejemplares similares