Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil for treating systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Mizoribine (MZR) is an immunosuppressive agent that selectively inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase; its actions are considerably similar to those of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). This study aimed to clarify whether MZR can be a good treatment option for systemic lupus erythemato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayano, Masahiro, Kimoto, Yasutaka, Mitoma, Hiroki, Akahoshi, Mitsuteru, Ono, Nobuyuki, Arinobu, Yojiro, Akashi, Koichi, Horiuchi, Takahiko, Niiro, Hiroaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221096367
_version_ 1784708911262072832
author Ayano, Masahiro
Kimoto, Yasutaka
Mitoma, Hiroki
Akahoshi, Mitsuteru
Ono, Nobuyuki
Arinobu, Yojiro
Akashi, Koichi
Horiuchi, Takahiko
Niiro, Hiroaki
author_facet Ayano, Masahiro
Kimoto, Yasutaka
Mitoma, Hiroki
Akahoshi, Mitsuteru
Ono, Nobuyuki
Arinobu, Yojiro
Akashi, Koichi
Horiuchi, Takahiko
Niiro, Hiroaki
author_sort Ayano, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mizoribine (MZR) is an immunosuppressive agent that selectively inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase; its actions are considerably similar to those of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). This study aimed to clarify whether MZR can be a good treatment option for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to compare the efficacy and safety of MZR and MMF in patients with active SLE. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the efficacy, continuation rate, and safety of MZR (52 patients) and MMF (31 patients) after adjusting for stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores. The efficacy endpoints were as follows: cumulative incidence of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) or remission attainment and flares and change in prednisolone dose over 2 years. Drug continuation rates were defined as the time from drug initiation to discontinuation for any cause, owing to the lack of efficacy, or owing to adverse events. The safety endpoint was the frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 25 (48.1%) and 13 (25.0%) patients in the MZR group and 18 (58.1%) and 15 (48.3%) in the MMF group achieved LLDAS and remission during the follow-up period, respectively; thus, the cumulative incidence of LLDAS and remission attainment of the two groups was similar after adjustment. Prednisolone dose was steadily reduced in both the groups, and the change in prednisolone dose was nearly identical between the two groups. Drug discontinuation rate due to adverse events and the frequency of all adverse events and infections were higher in the MMF group than in the MZR group, albeit without significance after adjustment. CONCLUSION: MZR is as effective as MMF in controlling SLE activity. The adverse events of MZR, whose profile differs from MMF, are comparable to or less than those of MMF. MZR may be a valuable option as an immunosuppressive agent for SLE, as well as MMF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9109492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91094922022-05-17 Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil for treating systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study Ayano, Masahiro Kimoto, Yasutaka Mitoma, Hiroki Akahoshi, Mitsuteru Ono, Nobuyuki Arinobu, Yojiro Akashi, Koichi Horiuchi, Takahiko Niiro, Hiroaki Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Mizoribine (MZR) is an immunosuppressive agent that selectively inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase; its actions are considerably similar to those of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). This study aimed to clarify whether MZR can be a good treatment option for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to compare the efficacy and safety of MZR and MMF in patients with active SLE. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the efficacy, continuation rate, and safety of MZR (52 patients) and MMF (31 patients) after adjusting for stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores. The efficacy endpoints were as follows: cumulative incidence of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) or remission attainment and flares and change in prednisolone dose over 2 years. Drug continuation rates were defined as the time from drug initiation to discontinuation for any cause, owing to the lack of efficacy, or owing to adverse events. The safety endpoint was the frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 25 (48.1%) and 13 (25.0%) patients in the MZR group and 18 (58.1%) and 15 (48.3%) in the MMF group achieved LLDAS and remission during the follow-up period, respectively; thus, the cumulative incidence of LLDAS and remission attainment of the two groups was similar after adjustment. Prednisolone dose was steadily reduced in both the groups, and the change in prednisolone dose was nearly identical between the two groups. Drug discontinuation rate due to adverse events and the frequency of all adverse events and infections were higher in the MMF group than in the MZR group, albeit without significance after adjustment. CONCLUSION: MZR is as effective as MMF in controlling SLE activity. The adverse events of MZR, whose profile differs from MMF, are comparable to or less than those of MMF. MZR may be a valuable option as an immunosuppressive agent for SLE, as well as MMF. SAGE Publications 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9109492/ /pubmed/35586513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221096367 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ayano, Masahiro
Kimoto, Yasutaka
Mitoma, Hiroki
Akahoshi, Mitsuteru
Ono, Nobuyuki
Arinobu, Yojiro
Akashi, Koichi
Horiuchi, Takahiko
Niiro, Hiroaki
Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil for treating systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study
title Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil for treating systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil for treating systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil for treating systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil for treating systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil for treating systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil for treating systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221096367
work_keys_str_mv AT ayanomasahiro comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmizoribineandmycophenolatemofetilfortreatingsystemiclupuserythematosusaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kimotoyasutaka comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmizoribineandmycophenolatemofetilfortreatingsystemiclupuserythematosusaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mitomahiroki comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmizoribineandmycophenolatemofetilfortreatingsystemiclupuserythematosusaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT akahoshimitsuteru comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmizoribineandmycophenolatemofetilfortreatingsystemiclupuserythematosusaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ononobuyuki comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmizoribineandmycophenolatemofetilfortreatingsystemiclupuserythematosusaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT arinobuyojiro comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmizoribineandmycophenolatemofetilfortreatingsystemiclupuserythematosusaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT akashikoichi comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmizoribineandmycophenolatemofetilfortreatingsystemiclupuserythematosusaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT horiuchitakahiko comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmizoribineandmycophenolatemofetilfortreatingsystemiclupuserythematosusaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT niirohiroaki comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmizoribineandmycophenolatemofetilfortreatingsystemiclupuserythematosusaretrospectivecohortstudy