Cargando…
Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic Outcomes and Complications
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following revision surgery following Harrington rod instrumentation. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision surgery with a minimum of 1-year follow-up for flatback sy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220960759 |
_version_ | 1784708915458473984 |
---|---|
author | Louie, Philip K. Iyer, Sravisht Khanna, Krishn Harada, Garrett K. Khalid, Alina Gupta, Munish Burton, Douglas Shaffrey, Christopher Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Dewald, Christopher J. Schwab, Frank J. Kim, Han Jo |
author_facet | Louie, Philip K. Iyer, Sravisht Khanna, Krishn Harada, Garrett K. Khalid, Alina Gupta, Munish Burton, Douglas Shaffrey, Christopher Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Dewald, Christopher J. Schwab, Frank J. Kim, Han Jo |
author_sort | Louie, Philip K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following revision surgery following Harrington rod instrumentation. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision surgery with a minimum of 1-year follow-up for flatback syndrome following Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were identified from a multicenter dataset. Baseline demographics and intraoperative information were obtained. Preoperative, initial postoperative, and most recent spinopelvic parameters were compared. Postoperative complications and reoperations were subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 27.7 months. Overall, 14 patients (34.1%) underwent a combined anterior-posterior fusion, and 27 (65.9%) underwent an osteotomy for correction. Preoperatively, the most common lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was at L3 and L4 (61%), whereas 85% had a LIV to the pelvis after revision. The mean preoperative pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis were 23.7° and 89.6 mm. This was corrected to 8.1° and 28.9 mm and maintained to 9.04° and 34.4 mm at latest follow-up. Complications included deep wound infection (12.2%), durotomy (14.6%), implant related failures (14.6%), and temporary neurologic deficits (22.0%). Eight patients underwent further revision surgery at an average of 7.4 months after initial revision. CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple surgical techniques to address symptomatic flatback syndrome in patients with previous Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. At an average of 27.7 months follow-up, pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis can be successfully corrected and maintained. However, complication and reoperation rates remain high. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9109553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91095532022-05-17 Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic Outcomes and Complications Louie, Philip K. Iyer, Sravisht Khanna, Krishn Harada, Garrett K. Khalid, Alina Gupta, Munish Burton, Douglas Shaffrey, Christopher Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Dewald, Christopher J. Schwab, Frank J. Kim, Han Jo Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following revision surgery following Harrington rod instrumentation. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision surgery with a minimum of 1-year follow-up for flatback syndrome following Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were identified from a multicenter dataset. Baseline demographics and intraoperative information were obtained. Preoperative, initial postoperative, and most recent spinopelvic parameters were compared. Postoperative complications and reoperations were subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 27.7 months. Overall, 14 patients (34.1%) underwent a combined anterior-posterior fusion, and 27 (65.9%) underwent an osteotomy for correction. Preoperatively, the most common lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was at L3 and L4 (61%), whereas 85% had a LIV to the pelvis after revision. The mean preoperative pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis were 23.7° and 89.6 mm. This was corrected to 8.1° and 28.9 mm and maintained to 9.04° and 34.4 mm at latest follow-up. Complications included deep wound infection (12.2%), durotomy (14.6%), implant related failures (14.6%), and temporary neurologic deficits (22.0%). Eight patients underwent further revision surgery at an average of 7.4 months after initial revision. CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple surgical techniques to address symptomatic flatback syndrome in patients with previous Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. At an average of 27.7 months follow-up, pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis can be successfully corrected and maintained. However, complication and reoperation rates remain high. SAGE Publications 2020-10-01 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9109553/ /pubmed/33000651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220960759 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Louie, Philip K. Iyer, Sravisht Khanna, Krishn Harada, Garrett K. Khalid, Alina Gupta, Munish Burton, Douglas Shaffrey, Christopher Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Dewald, Christopher J. Schwab, Frank J. Kim, Han Jo Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic Outcomes and Complications |
title | Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic
Outcomes and Complications |
title_full | Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic
Outcomes and Complications |
title_fullStr | Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic
Outcomes and Complications |
title_full_unstemmed | Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic
Outcomes and Complications |
title_short | Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic
Outcomes and Complications |
title_sort | revision strategies for harrington rod instrumentation: radiographic
outcomes and complications |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220960759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT louiephilipk revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT iyersravisht revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT khannakrishn revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT haradagarrettk revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT khalidalina revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT guptamunish revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT burtondouglas revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT shaffreychristopher revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT lafagerenaud revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT lafagevirginie revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT dewaldchristopherj revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT schwabfrankj revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications AT kimhanjo revisionstrategiesforharringtonrodinstrumentationradiographicoutcomesandcomplications |