Cargando…

When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry

The multibillion-dollar fertility industry promotes standardization in in vitro fertilization laboratories. Transnational pharmaceutical and biotechnological giants distribute a wide range of fertility products, from embryo culture mediums and incubator technologies to add-ons such as time-lapse emb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helosvuori, Elina, Homanen, Riikka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03063127221083869
_version_ 1784708922469253120
author Helosvuori, Elina
Homanen, Riikka
author_facet Helosvuori, Elina
Homanen, Riikka
author_sort Helosvuori, Elina
collection PubMed
description The multibillion-dollar fertility industry promotes standardization in in vitro fertilization laboratories. Transnational pharmaceutical and biotechnological giants distribute a wide range of fertility products, from embryo culture mediums and incubator technologies to add-ons such as time-lapse embryo monitoring. These technologies are designed to standardize and automate knowledge production regarding embryonic viability. More effective knowledge production enables the more effective selection of embryos for transfer, which in turn leads to more future babies and enables economic scaling-up. Drawing on two multi-sited ethnographic studies at eight fertility clinics in Finland during 2013–2020, this article discusses how knowledge about embryos is produced in the processes and practices of embryo culture. We argue that automation and standardization in clinical practice are not always perceived as economically desirable. Sometimes standard technologies do not replace hands-on knowledge production, although they may transform it. The technologies are also perceived as modifying the object of knowledge itself in undesired or unnecessary ways. In such cases, concerns are raised regarding the best interests of patients, embryos and future babies, who might be better served by masterful laboratory craftwork. We conclude that embryo culture is not only a site of knowledge production – one that aims to make babies and parents through standard and craftwork knowledge practices – but also a site of multiple bio-economies of assisted reproduction, some of which resist automation and standardization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9109581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91095812022-05-17 When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry Helosvuori, Elina Homanen, Riikka Soc Stud Sci Articles The multibillion-dollar fertility industry promotes standardization in in vitro fertilization laboratories. Transnational pharmaceutical and biotechnological giants distribute a wide range of fertility products, from embryo culture mediums and incubator technologies to add-ons such as time-lapse embryo monitoring. These technologies are designed to standardize and automate knowledge production regarding embryonic viability. More effective knowledge production enables the more effective selection of embryos for transfer, which in turn leads to more future babies and enables economic scaling-up. Drawing on two multi-sited ethnographic studies at eight fertility clinics in Finland during 2013–2020, this article discusses how knowledge about embryos is produced in the processes and practices of embryo culture. We argue that automation and standardization in clinical practice are not always perceived as economically desirable. Sometimes standard technologies do not replace hands-on knowledge production, although they may transform it. The technologies are also perceived as modifying the object of knowledge itself in undesired or unnecessary ways. In such cases, concerns are raised regarding the best interests of patients, embryos and future babies, who might be better served by masterful laboratory craftwork. We conclude that embryo culture is not only a site of knowledge production – one that aims to make babies and parents through standard and craftwork knowledge practices – but also a site of multiple bio-economies of assisted reproduction, some of which resist automation and standardization. SAGE Publications 2022-03-17 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9109581/ /pubmed/35297697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03063127221083869 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Helosvuori, Elina
Homanen, Riikka
When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry
title When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry
title_full When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry
title_fullStr When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry
title_full_unstemmed When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry
title_short When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry
title_sort when craft kicks back: embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03063127221083869
work_keys_str_mv AT helosvuorielina whencraftkicksbackembryocultureasknowledgeproductioninthecontextofthetransnationalfertilityindustry
AT homanenriikka whencraftkicksbackembryocultureasknowledgeproductioninthecontextofthetransnationalfertilityindustry