Cargando…

WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021

The WHO informal consultation was held to promote the revision of WHO guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs) adopted by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. It was agreed in the past consultations that the evaluation principles in the guideli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wadhwa, Meenu, Kang, Hye-Na, Thorpe, Robin, Knezevic, Ivana, Aprea, P., Bielsky, M.-C., Ekman, N., Heim, H.-K., Joung, J., Kurki, P., Lacana, E., Njue, C., Nkansah, E., Savkina, M., Thorpe, R., Yamaguchi, T., Wadhwa, M., Wang, J., Weise, M., Wolff-Holz, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35466023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.03.001
_version_ 1784708948861911040
author Wadhwa, Meenu
Kang, Hye-Na
Thorpe, Robin
Knezevic, Ivana
Aprea, P.
Bielsky, M.-C.
Ekman, N.
Heim, H.-K.
Joung, J.
Kurki, P.
Lacana, E.
Njue, C.
Nkansah, E.
Savkina, M.
Thorpe, R.
Yamaguchi, T.
Wadhwa, M.
Wang, J.
Weise, M.
Wolff-Holz, E.
author_facet Wadhwa, Meenu
Kang, Hye-Na
Thorpe, Robin
Knezevic, Ivana
Aprea, P.
Bielsky, M.-C.
Ekman, N.
Heim, H.-K.
Joung, J.
Kurki, P.
Lacana, E.
Njue, C.
Nkansah, E.
Savkina, M.
Thorpe, R.
Yamaguchi, T.
Wadhwa, M.
Wang, J.
Weise, M.
Wolff-Holz, E.
author_sort Wadhwa, Meenu
collection PubMed
description The WHO informal consultation was held to promote the revision of WHO guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs) adopted by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. It was agreed in the past consultations that the evaluation principles in the guidelines are still valid, but a review was recommended to provide more clarity and case-by-case flexibility. The opportunity was therefore taken to review the experience and identify areas where the current guidance could be more permissive without compromising its basic principles, and where additional explanation could be provided regarding the possibility of reducing the amount of data needed for regulatory approval. The meeting participants applauded the leading role taken by the WHO in providing a much-needed streamlined approach for development and evaluation of SBPs which will provide efficient and cost-effective product development and increase patient access to treatments. It was recognized that the principles as currently described in the draft WHO guidelines are based on sound science and experience gained over the last fifteen years of biosimilar approvals. However, since these guidelines when finalised will constitute the global standard for biosimilar evaluation and assist national regulatory authorities in establishing revised guidance and regulatory practice in this complex area, it was felt that further revision and clarity on certain perspectives in specific areas was necessary to dispel uncertainties arising in the current revised version. This report describes the principles in the draft guidelines, including topics discussed and consensus reached.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9109723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91097232022-06-14 WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021 Wadhwa, Meenu Kang, Hye-Na Thorpe, Robin Knezevic, Ivana Aprea, P. Bielsky, M.-C. Ekman, N. Heim, H.-K. Joung, J. Kurki, P. Lacana, E. Njue, C. Nkansah, E. Savkina, M. Thorpe, R. Yamaguchi, T. Wadhwa, M. Wang, J. Weise, M. Wolff-Holz, E. Biologicals Meeting Report The WHO informal consultation was held to promote the revision of WHO guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs) adopted by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. It was agreed in the past consultations that the evaluation principles in the guidelines are still valid, but a review was recommended to provide more clarity and case-by-case flexibility. The opportunity was therefore taken to review the experience and identify areas where the current guidance could be more permissive without compromising its basic principles, and where additional explanation could be provided regarding the possibility of reducing the amount of data needed for regulatory approval. The meeting participants applauded the leading role taken by the WHO in providing a much-needed streamlined approach for development and evaluation of SBPs which will provide efficient and cost-effective product development and increase patient access to treatments. It was recognized that the principles as currently described in the draft WHO guidelines are based on sound science and experience gained over the last fifteen years of biosimilar approvals. However, since these guidelines when finalised will constitute the global standard for biosimilar evaluation and assist national regulatory authorities in establishing revised guidance and regulatory practice in this complex area, it was felt that further revision and clarity on certain perspectives in specific areas was necessary to dispel uncertainties arising in the current revised version. This report describes the principles in the draft guidelines, including topics discussed and consensus reached. Academic Press 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9109723/ /pubmed/35466023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.03.001 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Alliance for Biological Standardization. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Meeting Report
Wadhwa, Meenu
Kang, Hye-Na
Thorpe, Robin
Knezevic, Ivana
Aprea, P.
Bielsky, M.-C.
Ekman, N.
Heim, H.-K.
Joung, J.
Kurki, P.
Lacana, E.
Njue, C.
Nkansah, E.
Savkina, M.
Thorpe, R.
Yamaguchi, T.
Wadhwa, M.
Wang, J.
Weise, M.
Wolff-Holz, E.
WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021
title WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021
title_full WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021
title_fullStr WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021
title_full_unstemmed WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021
title_short WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021
title_sort who informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 june – 2 july 2021
topic Meeting Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35466023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.03.001
work_keys_str_mv AT wadhwameenu whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT kanghyena whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT thorperobin whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT knezevicivana whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT apreap whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT bielskymc whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT ekmann whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT heimhk whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT joungj whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT kurkip whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT lacanae whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT njuec whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT nkansahe whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT savkinam whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT thorper whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT yamaguchit whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT wadhwam whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT wangj whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT weisem whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT wolffholze whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021
AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021