Cargando…
WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021
The WHO informal consultation was held to promote the revision of WHO guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs) adopted by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. It was agreed in the past consultations that the evaluation principles in the guideli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35466023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.03.001 |
_version_ | 1784708948861911040 |
---|---|
author | Wadhwa, Meenu Kang, Hye-Na Thorpe, Robin Knezevic, Ivana Aprea, P. Bielsky, M.-C. Ekman, N. Heim, H.-K. Joung, J. Kurki, P. Lacana, E. Njue, C. Nkansah, E. Savkina, M. Thorpe, R. Yamaguchi, T. Wadhwa, M. Wang, J. Weise, M. Wolff-Holz, E. |
author_facet | Wadhwa, Meenu Kang, Hye-Na Thorpe, Robin Knezevic, Ivana Aprea, P. Bielsky, M.-C. Ekman, N. Heim, H.-K. Joung, J. Kurki, P. Lacana, E. Njue, C. Nkansah, E. Savkina, M. Thorpe, R. Yamaguchi, T. Wadhwa, M. Wang, J. Weise, M. Wolff-Holz, E. |
author_sort | Wadhwa, Meenu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The WHO informal consultation was held to promote the revision of WHO guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs) adopted by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. It was agreed in the past consultations that the evaluation principles in the guidelines are still valid, but a review was recommended to provide more clarity and case-by-case flexibility. The opportunity was therefore taken to review the experience and identify areas where the current guidance could be more permissive without compromising its basic principles, and where additional explanation could be provided regarding the possibility of reducing the amount of data needed for regulatory approval. The meeting participants applauded the leading role taken by the WHO in providing a much-needed streamlined approach for development and evaluation of SBPs which will provide efficient and cost-effective product development and increase patient access to treatments. It was recognized that the principles as currently described in the draft WHO guidelines are based on sound science and experience gained over the last fifteen years of biosimilar approvals. However, since these guidelines when finalised will constitute the global standard for biosimilar evaluation and assist national regulatory authorities in establishing revised guidance and regulatory practice in this complex area, it was felt that further revision and clarity on certain perspectives in specific areas was necessary to dispel uncertainties arising in the current revised version. This report describes the principles in the draft guidelines, including topics discussed and consensus reached. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9109723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91097232022-06-14 WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021 Wadhwa, Meenu Kang, Hye-Na Thorpe, Robin Knezevic, Ivana Aprea, P. Bielsky, M.-C. Ekman, N. Heim, H.-K. Joung, J. Kurki, P. Lacana, E. Njue, C. Nkansah, E. Savkina, M. Thorpe, R. Yamaguchi, T. Wadhwa, M. Wang, J. Weise, M. Wolff-Holz, E. Biologicals Meeting Report The WHO informal consultation was held to promote the revision of WHO guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs) adopted by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. It was agreed in the past consultations that the evaluation principles in the guidelines are still valid, but a review was recommended to provide more clarity and case-by-case flexibility. The opportunity was therefore taken to review the experience and identify areas where the current guidance could be more permissive without compromising its basic principles, and where additional explanation could be provided regarding the possibility of reducing the amount of data needed for regulatory approval. The meeting participants applauded the leading role taken by the WHO in providing a much-needed streamlined approach for development and evaluation of SBPs which will provide efficient and cost-effective product development and increase patient access to treatments. It was recognized that the principles as currently described in the draft WHO guidelines are based on sound science and experience gained over the last fifteen years of biosimilar approvals. However, since these guidelines when finalised will constitute the global standard for biosimilar evaluation and assist national regulatory authorities in establishing revised guidance and regulatory practice in this complex area, it was felt that further revision and clarity on certain perspectives in specific areas was necessary to dispel uncertainties arising in the current revised version. This report describes the principles in the draft guidelines, including topics discussed and consensus reached. Academic Press 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9109723/ /pubmed/35466023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.03.001 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Alliance for Biological Standardization. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Meeting Report Wadhwa, Meenu Kang, Hye-Na Thorpe, Robin Knezevic, Ivana Aprea, P. Bielsky, M.-C. Ekman, N. Heim, H.-K. Joung, J. Kurki, P. Lacana, E. Njue, C. Nkansah, E. Savkina, M. Thorpe, R. Yamaguchi, T. Wadhwa, M. Wang, J. Weise, M. Wolff-Holz, E. WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021 |
title | WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021 |
title_full | WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021 |
title_fullStr | WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021 |
title_full_unstemmed | WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021 |
title_short | WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June – 2 July 2021 |
title_sort | who informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 june – 2 july 2021 |
topic | Meeting Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35466023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.03.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadhwameenu whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT kanghyena whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT thorperobin whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT knezevicivana whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT apreap whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT bielskymc whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT ekmann whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT heimhk whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT joungj whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT kurkip whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT lacanae whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT njuec whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT nkansahe whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT savkinam whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT thorper whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT yamaguchit whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT wadhwam whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT wangj whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT weisem whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT wolffholze whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 AT whoinformalconsultationonrevisionofguidelinesonevaluationofsimilarbiotherapeuticproductsvirtualmeeting30june2july2021 |