Cargando…

Feasibility and Relevance of an Intervention with Systematic Screening as a Base for Individualized Rehabilitation in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Trial of the ReScreen Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of women with breast cancer (BC) experience a wide range of long-term persistent and troublesome side effects related to the disease and its treatment. The ReScreen randomized controlled trial is conducted aiming to evaluate the effect of early screening of distr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olsson, Ing-Marie, Malmström, Marlene, Rydén, Lisa, Olsson Möller, Ulrika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586080
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S355055
_version_ 1784708997809438720
author Olsson, Ing-Marie
Malmström, Marlene
Rydén, Lisa
Olsson Möller, Ulrika
author_facet Olsson, Ing-Marie
Malmström, Marlene
Rydén, Lisa
Olsson Möller, Ulrika
author_sort Olsson, Ing-Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of women with breast cancer (BC) experience a wide range of long-term persistent and troublesome side effects related to the disease and its treatment. The ReScreen randomized controlled trial is conducted aiming to evaluate the effect of early screening of distress followed by individualized rehabilitation after primary BC treatment. PURPOSE: To examine recruitment, retention, distribution of distress, relevance of intervention and reported problems in a pilot trial of the ReScreen RCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on international research, a cutoff of ≥7 on the Distress Thermometer was used to identify women in need of extended support. Those who reported high distress were randomized to intervention group (IG, n = 9) or control group (CG, n = 9), while women with low distress formed an observational group (OG, n = 67). Self-reported data was collected at baseline, 2 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after start of treatment. The participants were recruited from a BC unit in Sweden. Descriptive statistics were used for analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients consented to participate. The recruitment rate was 73%, answer frequency was 98%, 64%, 95%, and retention rate was 100%, 56%, 91% in the IG, CG and OG, respectively. Few systematic errors were identified. When exploring the distribution of distress, it was evident that the participants scoring ≥7 were fewer (21.2%) than reported in previous studies (34–43%). The most commonly problems reported were in line with previous reports of symptoms, including fatigue and worry. CONCLUSION: The satisfactory rates of inclusion and data collection and the few systematic errors indicate that the ReScreen study is feasible if well planned and executed. To identify patients in need of extended support, an adjustment of the cutoff in the main study is indicated. Based on self-reported problems, the intervention was found relevant in this context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9109980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91099802022-05-17 Feasibility and Relevance of an Intervention with Systematic Screening as a Base for Individualized Rehabilitation in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Trial of the ReScreen Randomized Controlled Trial Olsson, Ing-Marie Malmström, Marlene Rydén, Lisa Olsson Möller, Ulrika J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of women with breast cancer (BC) experience a wide range of long-term persistent and troublesome side effects related to the disease and its treatment. The ReScreen randomized controlled trial is conducted aiming to evaluate the effect of early screening of distress followed by individualized rehabilitation after primary BC treatment. PURPOSE: To examine recruitment, retention, distribution of distress, relevance of intervention and reported problems in a pilot trial of the ReScreen RCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on international research, a cutoff of ≥7 on the Distress Thermometer was used to identify women in need of extended support. Those who reported high distress were randomized to intervention group (IG, n = 9) or control group (CG, n = 9), while women with low distress formed an observational group (OG, n = 67). Self-reported data was collected at baseline, 2 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after start of treatment. The participants were recruited from a BC unit in Sweden. Descriptive statistics were used for analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients consented to participate. The recruitment rate was 73%, answer frequency was 98%, 64%, 95%, and retention rate was 100%, 56%, 91% in the IG, CG and OG, respectively. Few systematic errors were identified. When exploring the distribution of distress, it was evident that the participants scoring ≥7 were fewer (21.2%) than reported in previous studies (34–43%). The most commonly problems reported were in line with previous reports of symptoms, including fatigue and worry. CONCLUSION: The satisfactory rates of inclusion and data collection and the few systematic errors indicate that the ReScreen study is feasible if well planned and executed. To identify patients in need of extended support, an adjustment of the cutoff in the main study is indicated. Based on self-reported problems, the intervention was found relevant in this context. Dove 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9109980/ /pubmed/35586080 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S355055 Text en © 2022 Olsson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Olsson, Ing-Marie
Malmström, Marlene
Rydén, Lisa
Olsson Möller, Ulrika
Feasibility and Relevance of an Intervention with Systematic Screening as a Base for Individualized Rehabilitation in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Trial of the ReScreen Randomized Controlled Trial
title Feasibility and Relevance of an Intervention with Systematic Screening as a Base for Individualized Rehabilitation in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Trial of the ReScreen Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Feasibility and Relevance of an Intervention with Systematic Screening as a Base for Individualized Rehabilitation in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Trial of the ReScreen Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Feasibility and Relevance of an Intervention with Systematic Screening as a Base for Individualized Rehabilitation in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Trial of the ReScreen Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Relevance of an Intervention with Systematic Screening as a Base for Individualized Rehabilitation in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Trial of the ReScreen Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Feasibility and Relevance of an Intervention with Systematic Screening as a Base for Individualized Rehabilitation in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Trial of the ReScreen Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort feasibility and relevance of an intervention with systematic screening as a base for individualized rehabilitation in breast cancer patients: a pilot trial of the rescreen randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586080
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S355055
work_keys_str_mv AT olssoningmarie feasibilityandrelevanceofaninterventionwithsystematicscreeningasabaseforindividualizedrehabilitationinbreastcancerpatientsapilottrialoftherescreenrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT malmstrommarlene feasibilityandrelevanceofaninterventionwithsystematicscreeningasabaseforindividualizedrehabilitationinbreastcancerpatientsapilottrialoftherescreenrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rydenlisa feasibilityandrelevanceofaninterventionwithsystematicscreeningasabaseforindividualizedrehabilitationinbreastcancerpatientsapilottrialoftherescreenrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olssonmollerulrika feasibilityandrelevanceofaninterventionwithsystematicscreeningasabaseforindividualizedrehabilitationinbreastcancerpatientsapilottrialoftherescreenrandomizedcontrolledtrial