Cargando…
Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice
BACKGROUND: The basis for studying the clinical sciences is the recall and comprehension of basic medical science facts. Do not, however, directly alter clinical information and as studies revealed that there are basic sciences knowledge retention of medical students gaps in clinical practice. The p...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S364631 |
_version_ | 1784708999150567424 |
---|---|
author | Goshu, Bahiru Tenaw |
author_facet | Goshu, Bahiru Tenaw |
author_sort | Goshu, Bahiru Tenaw |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The basis for studying the clinical sciences is the recall and comprehension of basic medical science facts. Do not, however, directly alter clinical information and as studies revealed that there are basic sciences knowledge retention of medical students gaps in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to assess medical students’ basic medical sciences knowledge retention and a relevance of basic sciences knowledge for clinical for practice. METHODS: An institutional-based descriptive cross-section epidemiological study design was carried out in the University of Gondar from April to May of 2021. A total of 15 basic and clinical sets of questions were used for data collection. The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20 to analyze data. RESULTS: A total of 191 medical students participated with response rate of 100%. Of these, 48.6% were male. Of all participant students, 69 (36.1%) have had the academic status of excellent with a commutative grade point average greater that 3.6 out of 4.0. Students who correctly responded for all categories of questions for basic and clinical sciences were 8.6±2.7 and 5±2.8 of second years, 5.5±2.3 and 7.1±1.2 of fourth years, 6.5±1.4 and 6.7±1.0 of fifth years, 5.3±0.8 and 8.4±2.5 of sixth years, respectively. As a representative year, the score of second year students’ performance for the basic sciences is a statistically significant with overall impact of the basic sciences (6.49±2.5, F=12.51, P≤0.001) and clinical sciences (4.0±1.9, F=14.73, P≤0.001). CONCLUSION: It is proposed that basic sciences knowledge should be aligned with clinical sciences preparation so that students may grasp disease diagnosis and treatment concepts in an integrated manner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9109985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91099852022-05-17 Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice Goshu, Bahiru Tenaw Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: The basis for studying the clinical sciences is the recall and comprehension of basic medical science facts. Do not, however, directly alter clinical information and as studies revealed that there are basic sciences knowledge retention of medical students gaps in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to assess medical students’ basic medical sciences knowledge retention and a relevance of basic sciences knowledge for clinical for practice. METHODS: An institutional-based descriptive cross-section epidemiological study design was carried out in the University of Gondar from April to May of 2021. A total of 15 basic and clinical sets of questions were used for data collection. The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20 to analyze data. RESULTS: A total of 191 medical students participated with response rate of 100%. Of these, 48.6% were male. Of all participant students, 69 (36.1%) have had the academic status of excellent with a commutative grade point average greater that 3.6 out of 4.0. Students who correctly responded for all categories of questions for basic and clinical sciences were 8.6±2.7 and 5±2.8 of second years, 5.5±2.3 and 7.1±1.2 of fourth years, 6.5±1.4 and 6.7±1.0 of fifth years, 5.3±0.8 and 8.4±2.5 of sixth years, respectively. As a representative year, the score of second year students’ performance for the basic sciences is a statistically significant with overall impact of the basic sciences (6.49±2.5, F=12.51, P≤0.001) and clinical sciences (4.0±1.9, F=14.73, P≤0.001). CONCLUSION: It is proposed that basic sciences knowledge should be aligned with clinical sciences preparation so that students may grasp disease diagnosis and treatment concepts in an integrated manner. Dove 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9109985/ /pubmed/35586443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S364631 Text en © 2022 Goshu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Goshu, Bahiru Tenaw Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice |
title | Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice |
title_full | Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice |
title_fullStr | Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice |
title_short | Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice |
title_sort | basic medical sciences knowledge retention for clinical practice |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S364631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goshubahirutenaw basicmedicalsciencesknowledgeretentionforclinicalpractice |