Cargando…

Effects of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Crystal Structure of Zirconia

OBJECTIVE: Intraoral polishing systems have become an alternative method for reglazing, which is important to prevent or minimize rapid wear of the opposing teeth. To assess the influence of different polishing systems and duration on surface roughness and crystal structure of zirconia was compared,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Cheng, Zeng, Xiaohua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5360893
_version_ 1784709061413961728
author Chen, Cheng
Zeng, Xiaohua
author_facet Chen, Cheng
Zeng, Xiaohua
author_sort Chen, Cheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Intraoral polishing systems have become an alternative method for reglazing, which is important to prevent or minimize rapid wear of the opposing teeth. To assess the influence of different polishing systems and duration on surface roughness and crystal structure of zirconia was compared, contributing to the preparation and effect improvement of clinical zirconia restorations. METHODS: Forty-eight zirconia specimens with equal size were fabricated by cutting and sintering zirconia discs. Then X-ray diffractometer (XRD) was adopted for examination of the specimens. Six specimens were selected as the grinding-polishing group (GL) after polishing, grinding, and glazing. Then six specimens were randomly selected from the remaining specimens as the grinding-unpolished group (GR) after surface conditioning by dental diamond burs. Subsequently, based on different polishing systems and duration, the rest of specimens were divided into following groups (n = 6): Youdent-20s group (Y20), Youdent-40s group (Y40), Youdent-60s group (Y60), Toboom-20s group (T20), Toboom-40s group (T40), and Toboom-60s group (T60). Additionally, a contour graph was applied for assessing the surface roughness of zirconia, scanning electron microscope (SEM) for observing surface topography, and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) for determining crystal structure of zirconia. RESULTS: The GR group had the highest roughness, and the roughness of the specimens polished for 20 s with different polishing systems was significantly higher than those polished for 40 s and 60 s with the same polishing systems. There were no significant difference between the Y20 and T20 groups, while the roughness of the specimens in both Y40 and Y60 groups was significantly higher than that of the T40 and T60 groups. And with the increasing polishing duration, the surface morphology of the specimen was gradually smooth and the morphology was gradually regular. Besides, the surface scratches of the T group were shallower than that of the Y group at the same polishing duration. The peak value of XRD profile of the specimen after grinding and polishing process was consistent with the baseline pattern of that the original specimen. CONCLUSION: Glazing can reduce the surface roughness of the specimens. Besides, the polishing effect of Toboom (TOB) system (polishing duration = 60 s) is the best. And different polishing durations of TOB system have no significant effect on the crystal surface structure of the specimen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9110246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91102462022-05-17 Effects of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Crystal Structure of Zirconia Chen, Cheng Zeng, Xiaohua Appl Bionics Biomech Research Article OBJECTIVE: Intraoral polishing systems have become an alternative method for reglazing, which is important to prevent or minimize rapid wear of the opposing teeth. To assess the influence of different polishing systems and duration on surface roughness and crystal structure of zirconia was compared, contributing to the preparation and effect improvement of clinical zirconia restorations. METHODS: Forty-eight zirconia specimens with equal size were fabricated by cutting and sintering zirconia discs. Then X-ray diffractometer (XRD) was adopted for examination of the specimens. Six specimens were selected as the grinding-polishing group (GL) after polishing, grinding, and glazing. Then six specimens were randomly selected from the remaining specimens as the grinding-unpolished group (GR) after surface conditioning by dental diamond burs. Subsequently, based on different polishing systems and duration, the rest of specimens were divided into following groups (n = 6): Youdent-20s group (Y20), Youdent-40s group (Y40), Youdent-60s group (Y60), Toboom-20s group (T20), Toboom-40s group (T40), and Toboom-60s group (T60). Additionally, a contour graph was applied for assessing the surface roughness of zirconia, scanning electron microscope (SEM) for observing surface topography, and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) for determining crystal structure of zirconia. RESULTS: The GR group had the highest roughness, and the roughness of the specimens polished for 20 s with different polishing systems was significantly higher than those polished for 40 s and 60 s with the same polishing systems. There were no significant difference between the Y20 and T20 groups, while the roughness of the specimens in both Y40 and Y60 groups was significantly higher than that of the T40 and T60 groups. And with the increasing polishing duration, the surface morphology of the specimen was gradually smooth and the morphology was gradually regular. Besides, the surface scratches of the T group were shallower than that of the Y group at the same polishing duration. The peak value of XRD profile of the specimen after grinding and polishing process was consistent with the baseline pattern of that the original specimen. CONCLUSION: Glazing can reduce the surface roughness of the specimens. Besides, the polishing effect of Toboom (TOB) system (polishing duration = 60 s) is the best. And different polishing durations of TOB system have no significant effect on the crystal surface structure of the specimen. Hindawi 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9110246/ /pubmed/35586363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5360893 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cheng Chen and Xiaohua Zeng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Cheng
Zeng, Xiaohua
Effects of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Crystal Structure of Zirconia
title Effects of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Crystal Structure of Zirconia
title_full Effects of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Crystal Structure of Zirconia
title_fullStr Effects of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Crystal Structure of Zirconia
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Crystal Structure of Zirconia
title_short Effects of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Crystal Structure of Zirconia
title_sort effects of different polishing systems on surface roughness and crystal structure of zirconia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5360893
work_keys_str_mv AT chencheng effectsofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandcrystalstructureofzirconia
AT zengxiaohua effectsofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandcrystalstructureofzirconia