Cargando…

The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray

PURPOSE: One of the key factors to the successful revision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is the reconstruction of the joint line, which can be determined using the epicondylar ratio (ER). The measurement is established in X-ray and MRI. However, it is not known whether computed tomography (CT) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lutz, Bernd, Polcikova, Lucia, Faschingbauer, Martin, Reichel, Heiko, Bieger, Ralf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33839911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03888-y
_version_ 1784709125429526528
author Lutz, Bernd
Polcikova, Lucia
Faschingbauer, Martin
Reichel, Heiko
Bieger, Ralf
author_facet Lutz, Bernd
Polcikova, Lucia
Faschingbauer, Martin
Reichel, Heiko
Bieger, Ralf
author_sort Lutz, Bernd
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: One of the key factors to the successful revision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is the reconstruction of the joint line, which can be determined using the epicondylar ratio (ER). The measurement is established in X-ray and MRI. However, it is not known whether computed tomography (CT) allows a more reliable determination. The objective was to assess the reliability of the ER in CT and to determine the correlation between the ER in CT and a.p. X-ray of the knee. METHODS: The ER was determined on X-ray and CT images of a consecutive series of 107 patients, who underwent rTKA. Measurements were made by two blinded observes, one measured twice. The inter- and intraobserver agreement, as well as the correlation between the two methods, were quantified with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. RESULTS: The average lateral ER was 0.32 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.32 (± 0.04) in CT. On the medial side, the average ER was 0.34 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.35 (± 0.04) in CT. The interobserver agreement for the same imaging modality was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.81 in X-ray as well as lateral 0.74 and medial 0.85 in CT. The correlation between the two methods was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: The ER can be reliably determined in X-ray and CT. Measurements of the two image modalities correlate. Prior to rTKA, the sole use of the X-ray is possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9110527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91105272022-05-18 The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray Lutz, Bernd Polcikova, Lucia Faschingbauer, Martin Reichel, Heiko Bieger, Ralf Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Knee Arthroplasty PURPOSE: One of the key factors to the successful revision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is the reconstruction of the joint line, which can be determined using the epicondylar ratio (ER). The measurement is established in X-ray and MRI. However, it is not known whether computed tomography (CT) allows a more reliable determination. The objective was to assess the reliability of the ER in CT and to determine the correlation between the ER in CT and a.p. X-ray of the knee. METHODS: The ER was determined on X-ray and CT images of a consecutive series of 107 patients, who underwent rTKA. Measurements were made by two blinded observes, one measured twice. The inter- and intraobserver agreement, as well as the correlation between the two methods, were quantified with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. RESULTS: The average lateral ER was 0.32 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.32 (± 0.04) in CT. On the medial side, the average ER was 0.34 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.35 (± 0.04) in CT. The interobserver agreement for the same imaging modality was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.81 in X-ray as well as lateral 0.74 and medial 0.85 in CT. The correlation between the two methods was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: The ER can be reliably determined in X-ray and CT. Measurements of the two image modalities correlate. Prior to rTKA, the sole use of the X-ray is possible. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9110527/ /pubmed/33839911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03888-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Knee Arthroplasty
Lutz, Bernd
Polcikova, Lucia
Faschingbauer, Martin
Reichel, Heiko
Bieger, Ralf
The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray
title The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray
title_full The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray
title_fullStr The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray
title_full_unstemmed The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray
title_short The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray
title_sort epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and x-ray
topic Knee Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33839911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03888-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lutzbernd theepicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray
AT polcikovalucia theepicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray
AT faschingbauermartin theepicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray
AT reichelheiko theepicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray
AT biegerralf theepicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray
AT lutzbernd epicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray
AT polcikovalucia epicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray
AT faschingbauermartin epicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray
AT reichelheiko epicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray
AT biegerralf epicondylarratiocanbereliablydeterminedinbothcomputedtomographyandxray