Cargando…
Safety and effectiveness of Omnitrope(®) (somatropin) in PATRO Children: a multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study comparison of US and international cohort data
There are known geographical differences in growth hormone deficiency (GHD) patient populations and treatment practices. Here, we present a comparison of safety and effectiveness data from patients treated with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in the USA versus other countries. PAtients TReat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35275291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04409-8 |
_version_ | 1784709128148484096 |
---|---|
author | Backeljauw, Philippe Kanumakala, Shankar Loche, Sandro Schwab, Karl Otfried Miller, Bradley S. Levy, Richard McCormick, Kenneth Zouater, Hichem Zabransky, Markus Campbell, Kim |
author_facet | Backeljauw, Philippe Kanumakala, Shankar Loche, Sandro Schwab, Karl Otfried Miller, Bradley S. Levy, Richard McCormick, Kenneth Zouater, Hichem Zabransky, Markus Campbell, Kim |
author_sort | Backeljauw, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are known geographical differences in growth hormone deficiency (GHD) patient populations and treatment practices. Here, we present a comparison of safety and effectiveness data from patients treated with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in the USA versus other countries. PAtients TReated with Omnitrope® (PATRO) Children is an international, non-interventional study with Omnitrope® (somatropin, Sandoz Inc.). All visits and assessments are carried out according to routine clinical practice, and doses of Omnitrope® are given according to country-specific prescribing information. By September 2018, 294 patients had been enrolled in the USA (53% rhGH-naïve) and 6206 patients had been enrolled across 13 other countries (international group; 86% rhGH-naïve). The most common indication in both groups was GHD. Overall, 194 US patients (66%) and 2977 international patients (48%) experienced adverse events (AEs; 886 and 11,716 events, respectively), most of which were of mild or moderate intensity. The AEs were suspected to be treatment-related in five US patients (1.7%) and 452 international patients (7.3%). All reported neoplasms were benign, non-serious, and considered unrelated to rhGH therapy. No cases of diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia were reported. In rhGH-naïve GHD patients, after 3 years of rhGH therapy, the improvement in mean height SD score from baseline was + 1.25 and + 1.35 in US and international patients, respectively. Conclusion: Omnitrope® treatment appears to be well tolerated and effective in US patients and those from other countries. Across the pediatric indications included, there was no evidence of an increased risk of developing uncommon or unexpected AEs with rhGH. Trial registration: NA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9110540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91105402022-05-18 Safety and effectiveness of Omnitrope(®) (somatropin) in PATRO Children: a multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study comparison of US and international cohort data Backeljauw, Philippe Kanumakala, Shankar Loche, Sandro Schwab, Karl Otfried Miller, Bradley S. Levy, Richard McCormick, Kenneth Zouater, Hichem Zabransky, Markus Campbell, Kim Eur J Pediatr Original Article There are known geographical differences in growth hormone deficiency (GHD) patient populations and treatment practices. Here, we present a comparison of safety and effectiveness data from patients treated with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in the USA versus other countries. PAtients TReated with Omnitrope® (PATRO) Children is an international, non-interventional study with Omnitrope® (somatropin, Sandoz Inc.). All visits and assessments are carried out according to routine clinical practice, and doses of Omnitrope® are given according to country-specific prescribing information. By September 2018, 294 patients had been enrolled in the USA (53% rhGH-naïve) and 6206 patients had been enrolled across 13 other countries (international group; 86% rhGH-naïve). The most common indication in both groups was GHD. Overall, 194 US patients (66%) and 2977 international patients (48%) experienced adverse events (AEs; 886 and 11,716 events, respectively), most of which were of mild or moderate intensity. The AEs were suspected to be treatment-related in five US patients (1.7%) and 452 international patients (7.3%). All reported neoplasms were benign, non-serious, and considered unrelated to rhGH therapy. No cases of diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia were reported. In rhGH-naïve GHD patients, after 3 years of rhGH therapy, the improvement in mean height SD score from baseline was + 1.25 and + 1.35 in US and international patients, respectively. Conclusion: Omnitrope® treatment appears to be well tolerated and effective in US patients and those from other countries. Across the pediatric indications included, there was no evidence of an increased risk of developing uncommon or unexpected AEs with rhGH. Trial registration: NA. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9110540/ /pubmed/35275291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04409-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Backeljauw, Philippe Kanumakala, Shankar Loche, Sandro Schwab, Karl Otfried Miller, Bradley S. Levy, Richard McCormick, Kenneth Zouater, Hichem Zabransky, Markus Campbell, Kim Safety and effectiveness of Omnitrope(®) (somatropin) in PATRO Children: a multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study comparison of US and international cohort data |
title | Safety and effectiveness of Omnitrope(®) (somatropin) in PATRO Children: a multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study comparison of US and international cohort data |
title_full | Safety and effectiveness of Omnitrope(®) (somatropin) in PATRO Children: a multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study comparison of US and international cohort data |
title_fullStr | Safety and effectiveness of Omnitrope(®) (somatropin) in PATRO Children: a multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study comparison of US and international cohort data |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and effectiveness of Omnitrope(®) (somatropin) in PATRO Children: a multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study comparison of US and international cohort data |
title_short | Safety and effectiveness of Omnitrope(®) (somatropin) in PATRO Children: a multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study comparison of US and international cohort data |
title_sort | safety and effectiveness of omnitrope(®) (somatropin) in patro children: a multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study comparison of us and international cohort data |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35275291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04409-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT backeljauwphilippe safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata AT kanumakalashankar safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata AT lochesandro safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata AT schwabkarlotfried safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata AT millerbradleys safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata AT levyrichard safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata AT mccormickkenneth safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata AT zouaterhichem safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata AT zabranskymarkus safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata AT campbellkim safetyandeffectivenessofomnitropesomatropininpatrochildrenamulticenterpostmarketingsurveillancestudycomparisonofusandinternationalcohortdata |