Cargando…

Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation

PURPOSE: In ultrasound imaging, interpolation is a key step in converting scanline data to brightness-mode (B-mode) images. Conventional methods, such as bilinear interpolation, do not fully capture the spatial dependence between data points, which leads to deviations from the underlying probability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Degirmenci, Alperen, Howe, Robert D., Perrin, Douglas P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.037001
_version_ 1784709130909384704
author Degirmenci, Alperen
Howe, Robert D.
Perrin, Douglas P.
author_facet Degirmenci, Alperen
Howe, Robert D.
Perrin, Douglas P.
author_sort Degirmenci, Alperen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In ultrasound imaging, interpolation is a key step in converting scanline data to brightness-mode (B-mode) images. Conventional methods, such as bilinear interpolation, do not fully capture the spatial dependence between data points, which leads to deviations from the underlying probability distribution at the interpolation points. APPROACH: We propose Gaussian process ([Formula: see text]) regression as an improved method for ultrasound scanline interpolation. Using ultrasound scanlines acquired from two different ultrasound scanners during in vivo trials, we compare the scanline conversion accuracy of three standard interpolation methods with that of [Formula: see text] regression, measuring the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and mean absolute error (MAE) for each method. RESULTS: The PSNR and MAE scores show that [Formula: see text] regression leads to more accurate scanline conversion compared to the nearest neighbor, bilinear, and cubic spline interpolation methods, for both datasets. Furthermore, limiting the interpolation window size of [Formula: see text] regression to 15 reduces computation time with minimal to no reduction in PSNR. CONCLUSIONS: [Formula: see text] regression quantitatively leads to more accurate scanline conversion and provides uncertainty estimates at each of the interpolation points. Our windowing method reduces the computational cost of using [Formula: see text] regression for scanline conversion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9110552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91105522023-05-17 Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation Degirmenci, Alperen Howe, Robert D. Perrin, Douglas P. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography PURPOSE: In ultrasound imaging, interpolation is a key step in converting scanline data to brightness-mode (B-mode) images. Conventional methods, such as bilinear interpolation, do not fully capture the spatial dependence between data points, which leads to deviations from the underlying probability distribution at the interpolation points. APPROACH: We propose Gaussian process ([Formula: see text]) regression as an improved method for ultrasound scanline interpolation. Using ultrasound scanlines acquired from two different ultrasound scanners during in vivo trials, we compare the scanline conversion accuracy of three standard interpolation methods with that of [Formula: see text] regression, measuring the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and mean absolute error (MAE) for each method. RESULTS: The PSNR and MAE scores show that [Formula: see text] regression leads to more accurate scanline conversion compared to the nearest neighbor, bilinear, and cubic spline interpolation methods, for both datasets. Furthermore, limiting the interpolation window size of [Formula: see text] regression to 15 reduces computation time with minimal to no reduction in PSNR. CONCLUSIONS: [Formula: see text] regression quantitatively leads to more accurate scanline conversion and provides uncertainty estimates at each of the interpolation points. Our windowing method reduces the computational cost of using [Formula: see text] regression for scanline conversion. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2022-05-17 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9110552/ /pubmed/35603259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.037001 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography
Degirmenci, Alperen
Howe, Robert D.
Perrin, Douglas P.
Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation
title Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation
title_full Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation
title_fullStr Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation
title_full_unstemmed Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation
title_short Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation
title_sort gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation
topic Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.037001
work_keys_str_mv AT degirmencialperen gaussianprocessregressionforultrasoundscanlineinterpolation
AT howerobertd gaussianprocessregressionforultrasoundscanlineinterpolation
AT perrindouglasp gaussianprocessregressionforultrasoundscanlineinterpolation