Cargando…
The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths
INTRODUCTION: Non-dermatology medical specialties may refer patients for skin biopsies, searching for a particular diagnosis. However, the diagnostic impact of the skin biopsy is not clearly established. This article aims to assess the indications for, and evaluate the clinical relevance of, skin bi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35430724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00717-x |
_version_ | 1784709135616442368 |
---|---|
author | Bailleux, Sophie Collins, Patrick Nikkels, Arjen F. |
author_facet | Bailleux, Sophie Collins, Patrick Nikkels, Arjen F. |
author_sort | Bailleux, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Non-dermatology medical specialties may refer patients for skin biopsies, searching for a particular diagnosis. However, the diagnostic impact of the skin biopsy is not clearly established. This article aims to assess the indications for, and evaluate the clinical relevance of, skin biopsies in non-dermatology medical specialties. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 23 non-dermatology specialty departments in a university medical center, requesting a list of indications for skin biopsies, as well as to 10 staff dermatologists to collect the indications of skin biopsies requested by non-dermatology specialties. Once the indications were collected, a literature search was performed to evaluate their clinical value and relevance. RESULTS: Eleven non-dermatology specialties provided a list of skin biopsy indications, to which staff dermatologists added seven more indications. A literature search revealed evidence-based medicine data for six diseases, that is, amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon’s syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Results were questionable concerning infectious endocarditis, acute graft-versus-host-disease, and the lupus band test. Skin biopsy were not evidenced as useful for the diagnosis of calciphylaxis, systemic scleroderma, Behçet’s disease, or hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. For the diagnosis of Alport’s syndrome, pseudoxanthoma elasticum, and vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, skin biopsy is currently outperformed by genetic analyses. For diagnoses such as Henoch–Schönlein purpura and Sjögren’s syndrome, skin biopsy represents an additional item among other diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSION: The usefulness of skin biopsy as requested by non-dermatology specialties is only evidenced for amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon’s syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, chronic graft-versus-host-disease, Henoch–Schönlein purpura, and Sjögren’s syndrome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9110592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91105922022-05-18 The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths Bailleux, Sophie Collins, Patrick Nikkels, Arjen F. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Review INTRODUCTION: Non-dermatology medical specialties may refer patients for skin biopsies, searching for a particular diagnosis. However, the diagnostic impact of the skin biopsy is not clearly established. This article aims to assess the indications for, and evaluate the clinical relevance of, skin biopsies in non-dermatology medical specialties. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 23 non-dermatology specialty departments in a university medical center, requesting a list of indications for skin biopsies, as well as to 10 staff dermatologists to collect the indications of skin biopsies requested by non-dermatology specialties. Once the indications were collected, a literature search was performed to evaluate their clinical value and relevance. RESULTS: Eleven non-dermatology specialties provided a list of skin biopsy indications, to which staff dermatologists added seven more indications. A literature search revealed evidence-based medicine data for six diseases, that is, amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon’s syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Results were questionable concerning infectious endocarditis, acute graft-versus-host-disease, and the lupus band test. Skin biopsy were not evidenced as useful for the diagnosis of calciphylaxis, systemic scleroderma, Behçet’s disease, or hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. For the diagnosis of Alport’s syndrome, pseudoxanthoma elasticum, and vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, skin biopsy is currently outperformed by genetic analyses. For diagnoses such as Henoch–Schönlein purpura and Sjögren’s syndrome, skin biopsy represents an additional item among other diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSION: The usefulness of skin biopsy as requested by non-dermatology specialties is only evidenced for amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon’s syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, chronic graft-versus-host-disease, Henoch–Schönlein purpura, and Sjögren’s syndrome. Springer Healthcare 2022-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9110592/ /pubmed/35430724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00717-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Bailleux, Sophie Collins, Patrick Nikkels, Arjen F. The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths |
title | The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths |
title_full | The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths |
title_fullStr | The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths |
title_full_unstemmed | The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths |
title_short | The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths |
title_sort | relevance of skin biopsies in general internal medicine: facts and myths |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35430724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00717-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bailleuxsophie therelevanceofskinbiopsiesingeneralinternalmedicinefactsandmyths AT collinspatrick therelevanceofskinbiopsiesingeneralinternalmedicinefactsandmyths AT nikkelsarjenf therelevanceofskinbiopsiesingeneralinternalmedicinefactsandmyths AT bailleuxsophie relevanceofskinbiopsiesingeneralinternalmedicinefactsandmyths AT collinspatrick relevanceofskinbiopsiesingeneralinternalmedicinefactsandmyths AT nikkelsarjenf relevanceofskinbiopsiesingeneralinternalmedicinefactsandmyths |