Cargando…

Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal timing (acute or subacute) of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated B aortic dissection (uTBAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken across three major databases (EMBASE/Medl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yang, Zhang, Xi-Hao, Chen, Zuo-Guan, Diao, Yong-Peng, Wu, Zhi-Yuan, Li, Yong-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592122
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.852628
_version_ 1784709153840693248
author Yang, Yang
Zhang, Xi-Hao
Chen, Zuo-Guan
Diao, Yong-Peng
Wu, Zhi-Yuan
Li, Yong-Jun
author_facet Yang, Yang
Zhang, Xi-Hao
Chen, Zuo-Guan
Diao, Yong-Peng
Wu, Zhi-Yuan
Li, Yong-Jun
author_sort Yang, Yang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal timing (acute or subacute) of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated B aortic dissection (uTBAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken across three major databases (EMBASE/Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) and was assessed until November 2021 to identify studies reporting the outcomes of TEVAR utilized to treat patients with uTBAD. The continuous variables were compared between the two groups using t-test and the categorical variables were compared using the χ(2)-test. A meta-analysis was used to produce pooled odds ratios for early and follow-up outcomes. The random effects models were applied. A statistical analysis was performed using R software v.4.1. RESULT: A comprehensive literature search found 490 citations published within the predetermined time span of the analysis. Three studies including 1,193 patients (acute group 718, subacute group 475) were finally included for downstream meta-analysis. An acute uTBAD group presented with higher rates both in 30-day complications (20.5 vs. 13.7%; p = 0.014) and mortality (4.6 vs. 1.3%; p = 0.004) than subacute group. The respiratory complications were significantly higher in the acute group than in the subacute group (10.8 vs. 5.0%; p = 0.015). The procedure success rate (90.8 vs. 93.6%; p = 0.329), the follow-up mortality (7.7 vs. 7.6%; p = 1) and dissection-related late mortality (3.9 vs. 5.3%; p = 0.603) showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggested that despite significantly higher 30-day complications and 30-day mortality in the acute uTBAD group, there was no significant difference in the follow-up mortality between the two groups. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021247609.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9110682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91106822022-05-18 Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yang, Yang Zhang, Xi-Hao Chen, Zuo-Guan Diao, Yong-Peng Wu, Zhi-Yuan Li, Yong-Jun Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal timing (acute or subacute) of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated B aortic dissection (uTBAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken across three major databases (EMBASE/Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) and was assessed until November 2021 to identify studies reporting the outcomes of TEVAR utilized to treat patients with uTBAD. The continuous variables were compared between the two groups using t-test and the categorical variables were compared using the χ(2)-test. A meta-analysis was used to produce pooled odds ratios for early and follow-up outcomes. The random effects models were applied. A statistical analysis was performed using R software v.4.1. RESULT: A comprehensive literature search found 490 citations published within the predetermined time span of the analysis. Three studies including 1,193 patients (acute group 718, subacute group 475) were finally included for downstream meta-analysis. An acute uTBAD group presented with higher rates both in 30-day complications (20.5 vs. 13.7%; p = 0.014) and mortality (4.6 vs. 1.3%; p = 0.004) than subacute group. The respiratory complications were significantly higher in the acute group than in the subacute group (10.8 vs. 5.0%; p = 0.015). The procedure success rate (90.8 vs. 93.6%; p = 0.329), the follow-up mortality (7.7 vs. 7.6%; p = 1) and dissection-related late mortality (3.9 vs. 5.3%; p = 0.603) showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggested that despite significantly higher 30-day complications and 30-day mortality in the acute uTBAD group, there was no significant difference in the follow-up mortality between the two groups. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021247609. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9110682/ /pubmed/35592122 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.852628 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yang, Zhang, Chen, Diao, Wu and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Yang, Yang
Zhang, Xi-Hao
Chen, Zuo-Guan
Diao, Yong-Peng
Wu, Zhi-Yuan
Li, Yong-Jun
Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort acute or subacute, the optimal timing for uncomplicated type b aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592122
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.852628
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyang acuteorsubacutetheoptimaltimingforuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxihao acuteorsubacutetheoptimaltimingforuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenzuoguan acuteorsubacutetheoptimaltimingforuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT diaoyongpeng acuteorsubacutetheoptimaltimingforuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuzhiyuan acuteorsubacutetheoptimaltimingforuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyongjun acuteorsubacutetheoptimaltimingforuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis