Cargando…

Performance evaluation of four rapid antibody tests for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

BACKGROUND: The prompt detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is important in the therapeutic management of infected patients. Rapid diagnostic tests are widely used for this purpose. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of four SARS‐CoV‐2 immunogl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jae Kyung, Ryu, Sook Won, Kim, Jae Soo, Jung, Bo Kyeung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35446996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24374
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The prompt detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is important in the therapeutic management of infected patients. Rapid diagnostic tests are widely used for this purpose. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of four SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoglobulin IgG/IgM rapid diagnostic tests in the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs and/or sputum were collected from 30 patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 and 30 healthy volunteers. All specimens were tested using four SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG/IgM rapid diagnostic tests and real‐time polymerase chain reaction. We assessed the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the tests. RESULTS: The clinical sensitivity of FREND™, SsmarTest™, BIOCREDIT™, and IVDLAB™ was 96.67%, 100.00%, 100.00%, and 96.67%, respectively, compared to real‐time polymerase chain reaction. The clinical specificity was 96.67%, 100.00%, 86.67%, and 96.67%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings could expedite the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 and thus reduce the risk of further transmission of the virus.