Cargando…

Comprehensive adjusted outcome data are needed to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with COVID‐19: Results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Determining how prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy influences outcomes in cancer patients presenting with COVID‐19 is essential for patient management but must account for confounding variables. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies reporting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minkove, Samuel J., Sun, Junfeng, Li, Yan, Cui, Xizhong, Cooper, Diane, Eichacker, Peter Q., Torabi‐Parizi, Parizad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35416370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2352
_version_ 1784709232020422656
author Minkove, Samuel J.
Sun, Junfeng
Li, Yan
Cui, Xizhong
Cooper, Diane
Eichacker, Peter Q.
Torabi‐Parizi, Parizad
author_facet Minkove, Samuel J.
Sun, Junfeng
Li, Yan
Cui, Xizhong
Cooper, Diane
Eichacker, Peter Q.
Torabi‐Parizi, Parizad
author_sort Minkove, Samuel J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Determining how prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy influences outcomes in cancer patients presenting with COVID‐19 is essential for patient management but must account for confounding variables. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies reporting adjusted effects of ICIs on survival, severe events, or hospitalisation in cancer patients with COVID‐19 based on variables including age, gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension (HTN), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other comorbidities. When adjusted effects were unavailable, unadjusted data were analysed. RESULTS: Of 42 observational studies (38 retrospective), 7 reported adjusted outcomes for ICIs and 2 provided sufficient individual patient data to calculate adjusted outcomes. In eight studies, adjusted outcomes were based on ≤7 variables. Over all studies, only one included >100 ICI patients while 26 included <10. ICIs did not alter the odds ratio (95%CI) (OR) of death significantly (random effects model), across adjusted (n = 8) [1.31 (0.58–2.95) p = 0.46; I (2) = 42%, p = 0.10], unadjusted (n = 30) [1.06 (0.85–1.32) p = 0.58; I (2) = 0%, p = 0.76] or combined [1.09 (0.88;1.36) p = 0.41; I (2) = 0%, p = 0.5)] studies. Similarly, ICIs did not alter severe events significantly across adjusted (n = 5) [1.20 (0.30–4.74) p = 0.73; I (2) = 52%, p = 0.08], unadjusted (n = 19) [(1.23 (0.87–1.75) p = 0.23; I (2) = 16%, p = 0.26] or combined [1.26 (0.90–1.77) p = 0.16; I (2) = 25%, p = 0.14] studies. Two studies provided adjusted hospitalisation data and when combined with 13 unadjusted studies, ICIs did not alter hospitalisation significantly [1.19 (0.85–1.68) p = 029; I (2) = 5%, p = 0.40]. Results of sensitivity analyses examining ICI effects based on 5 variables were inconclusive. Certainty of evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Across studies with adjusted and unadjusted results, ICIs did not alter outcomes significantly. But studies with comprehensive adjusted outcome data controlling for confounding variables are necessary to determine whether ICIs impact COVID‐19 outcomes in cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9111045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91110452022-05-17 Comprehensive adjusted outcome data are needed to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with COVID‐19: Results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis Minkove, Samuel J. Sun, Junfeng Li, Yan Cui, Xizhong Cooper, Diane Eichacker, Peter Q. Torabi‐Parizi, Parizad Rev Med Virol Reviews BACKGROUND: Determining how prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy influences outcomes in cancer patients presenting with COVID‐19 is essential for patient management but must account for confounding variables. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies reporting adjusted effects of ICIs on survival, severe events, or hospitalisation in cancer patients with COVID‐19 based on variables including age, gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension (HTN), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other comorbidities. When adjusted effects were unavailable, unadjusted data were analysed. RESULTS: Of 42 observational studies (38 retrospective), 7 reported adjusted outcomes for ICIs and 2 provided sufficient individual patient data to calculate adjusted outcomes. In eight studies, adjusted outcomes were based on ≤7 variables. Over all studies, only one included >100 ICI patients while 26 included <10. ICIs did not alter the odds ratio (95%CI) (OR) of death significantly (random effects model), across adjusted (n = 8) [1.31 (0.58–2.95) p = 0.46; I (2) = 42%, p = 0.10], unadjusted (n = 30) [1.06 (0.85–1.32) p = 0.58; I (2) = 0%, p = 0.76] or combined [1.09 (0.88;1.36) p = 0.41; I (2) = 0%, p = 0.5)] studies. Similarly, ICIs did not alter severe events significantly across adjusted (n = 5) [1.20 (0.30–4.74) p = 0.73; I (2) = 52%, p = 0.08], unadjusted (n = 19) [(1.23 (0.87–1.75) p = 0.23; I (2) = 16%, p = 0.26] or combined [1.26 (0.90–1.77) p = 0.16; I (2) = 25%, p = 0.14] studies. Two studies provided adjusted hospitalisation data and when combined with 13 unadjusted studies, ICIs did not alter hospitalisation significantly [1.19 (0.85–1.68) p = 029; I (2) = 5%, p = 0.40]. Results of sensitivity analyses examining ICI effects based on 5 variables were inconclusive. Certainty of evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Across studies with adjusted and unadjusted results, ICIs did not alter outcomes significantly. But studies with comprehensive adjusted outcome data controlling for confounding variables are necessary to determine whether ICIs impact COVID‐19 outcomes in cancer patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-13 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9111045/ /pubmed/35416370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2352 Text en Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Reviews in Medical Virology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Minkove, Samuel J.
Sun, Junfeng
Li, Yan
Cui, Xizhong
Cooper, Diane
Eichacker, Peter Q.
Torabi‐Parizi, Parizad
Comprehensive adjusted outcome data are needed to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with COVID‐19: Results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Comprehensive adjusted outcome data are needed to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with COVID‐19: Results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Comprehensive adjusted outcome data are needed to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with COVID‐19: Results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Comprehensive adjusted outcome data are needed to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with COVID‐19: Results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive adjusted outcome data are needed to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with COVID‐19: Results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Comprehensive adjusted outcome data are needed to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with COVID‐19: Results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort comprehensive adjusted outcome data are needed to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with covid‐19: results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35416370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2352
work_keys_str_mv AT minkovesamuelj comprehensiveadjustedoutcomedataareneededtoassesstheimpactofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientswithcovid19resultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunjunfeng comprehensiveadjustedoutcomedataareneededtoassesstheimpactofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientswithcovid19resultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyan comprehensiveadjustedoutcomedataareneededtoassesstheimpactofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientswithcovid19resultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuixizhong comprehensiveadjustedoutcomedataareneededtoassesstheimpactofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientswithcovid19resultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cooperdiane comprehensiveadjustedoutcomedataareneededtoassesstheimpactofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientswithcovid19resultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eichackerpeterq comprehensiveadjustedoutcomedataareneededtoassesstheimpactofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientswithcovid19resultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT torabipariziparizad comprehensiveadjustedoutcomedataareneededtoassesstheimpactofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincancerpatientswithcovid19resultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis