Cargando…

‘I was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff’: A survey of Australian emergency department staff experiences during COVID‐19

OBJECTIVE: To identify challenges faced by Australian hospital healthcare staff during the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey (30 June–15 August 2020) of healthcare staff from Australian emergency and infectious disease departments. Participants were contacted via professional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Anna Mae, Murray, Amanda, Jones, Mark, Keijzers, Gerben, Glasziou, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35142057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13943
_version_ 1784709258580852736
author Scott, Anna Mae
Murray, Amanda
Jones, Mark
Keijzers, Gerben
Glasziou, Paul
author_facet Scott, Anna Mae
Murray, Amanda
Jones, Mark
Keijzers, Gerben
Glasziou, Paul
author_sort Scott, Anna Mae
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify challenges faced by Australian hospital healthcare staff during the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey (30 June–15 August 2020) of healthcare staff from Australian emergency and infectious disease departments. Participants were contacted via professional organisations and asked about preparedness, personal protective equipment (PPE), information flow, patient care, infection concerns, workload and mental health. We calculated the proportion of answers to yes/no and Likert‐style questions; free‐text responses were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 162) were 23–67 years old, 98% worked in EDs, 68% were female, 87% from Queensland, and most worked as nurses (46%) or specialists (31%). Respondents felt their workplace was prepared for the pandemic (79%), had sufficient information about PPE (83%); none were sent home because of PPE shortages. Eighty‐five percent received sufficient information from official bodies and 50% were aware of the National COVID‐19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce guidelines. Most (83%) had sufficient information to provide optimal patient care, but 24% experienced unfair/abusive patient behaviour. Most (76%) were concerned about becoming infected by patients, 67% about infecting patients, and 78% about infecting someone at home. Workload decreased for 82% but 42% looked after more patients. Fifty‐seven percent experienced additional work‐related stress: 60% reporting experiencing anxiety and 53% experiencing burnout, with 36% and 46% continuing to experience these, respectively. Key challenges included: emotional, workplace/organisational, family/loved ones and PPE factors. CONCLUSION: The Australian system provided sufficient information and PPE. Staff experienced considerable stress, infection concerns and emotional challenges, which merit consideration in preparing for the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9111308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91113082022-05-17 ‘I was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff’: A survey of Australian emergency department staff experiences during COVID‐19 Scott, Anna Mae Murray, Amanda Jones, Mark Keijzers, Gerben Glasziou, Paul Emerg Med Australas Original Research OBJECTIVE: To identify challenges faced by Australian hospital healthcare staff during the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey (30 June–15 August 2020) of healthcare staff from Australian emergency and infectious disease departments. Participants were contacted via professional organisations and asked about preparedness, personal protective equipment (PPE), information flow, patient care, infection concerns, workload and mental health. We calculated the proportion of answers to yes/no and Likert‐style questions; free‐text responses were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 162) were 23–67 years old, 98% worked in EDs, 68% were female, 87% from Queensland, and most worked as nurses (46%) or specialists (31%). Respondents felt their workplace was prepared for the pandemic (79%), had sufficient information about PPE (83%); none were sent home because of PPE shortages. Eighty‐five percent received sufficient information from official bodies and 50% were aware of the National COVID‐19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce guidelines. Most (83%) had sufficient information to provide optimal patient care, but 24% experienced unfair/abusive patient behaviour. Most (76%) were concerned about becoming infected by patients, 67% about infecting patients, and 78% about infecting someone at home. Workload decreased for 82% but 42% looked after more patients. Fifty‐seven percent experienced additional work‐related stress: 60% reporting experiencing anxiety and 53% experiencing burnout, with 36% and 46% continuing to experience these, respectively. Key challenges included: emotional, workplace/organisational, family/loved ones and PPE factors. CONCLUSION: The Australian system provided sufficient information and PPE. Staff experienced considerable stress, infection concerns and emotional challenges, which merit consideration in preparing for the future. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022-03-01 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9111308/ /pubmed/35142057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13943 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Emergency Medicine Australasia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Scott, Anna Mae
Murray, Amanda
Jones, Mark
Keijzers, Gerben
Glasziou, Paul
‘I was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff’: A survey of Australian emergency department staff experiences during COVID‐19
title ‘I was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff’: A survey of Australian emergency department staff experiences during COVID‐19
title_full ‘I was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff’: A survey of Australian emergency department staff experiences during COVID‐19
title_fullStr ‘I was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff’: A survey of Australian emergency department staff experiences during COVID‐19
title_full_unstemmed ‘I was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff’: A survey of Australian emergency department staff experiences during COVID‐19
title_short ‘I was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff’: A survey of Australian emergency department staff experiences during COVID‐19
title_sort ‘i was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff’: a survey of australian emergency department staff experiences during covid‐19
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35142057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13943
work_keys_str_mv AT scottannamae iwaspreparedtobecomeinfectedasafrontlinemedicalstaffasurveyofaustralianemergencydepartmentstaffexperiencesduringcovid19
AT murrayamanda iwaspreparedtobecomeinfectedasafrontlinemedicalstaffasurveyofaustralianemergencydepartmentstaffexperiencesduringcovid19
AT jonesmark iwaspreparedtobecomeinfectedasafrontlinemedicalstaffasurveyofaustralianemergencydepartmentstaffexperiencesduringcovid19
AT keijzersgerben iwaspreparedtobecomeinfectedasafrontlinemedicalstaffasurveyofaustralianemergencydepartmentstaffexperiencesduringcovid19
AT glaszioupaul iwaspreparedtobecomeinfectedasafrontlinemedicalstaffasurveyofaustralianemergencydepartmentstaffexperiencesduringcovid19