Cargando…

The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

AIMS: This review aims to explore the prevalence and incidence rates of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic outbreak and which factors influence rates. BACKGROUND: Pandemics place considerable burden on care services, impacting on workers' health and their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hill, James Edward, Harris, Catherine, Danielle L., Christian, Boland, Paul, Doherty, Alison J., Benedetto, Valerio, Gita, Bhutani E., Clegg, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15175
_version_ 1784709305602146304
author Hill, James Edward
Harris, Catherine
Danielle L., Christian
Boland, Paul
Doherty, Alison J.
Benedetto, Valerio
Gita, Bhutani E.
Clegg, Andrew J.
author_facet Hill, James Edward
Harris, Catherine
Danielle L., Christian
Boland, Paul
Doherty, Alison J.
Benedetto, Valerio
Gita, Bhutani E.
Clegg, Andrew J.
author_sort Hill, James Edward
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This review aims to explore the prevalence and incidence rates of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic outbreak and which factors influence rates. BACKGROUND: Pandemics place considerable burden on care services, impacting on workers' health and their ability to deliver services. We systematically reviewed the prevalence and incidence of mental health conditions in care workers during pandemics. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO for cohort, cross‐sectional and case–control studies were undertaken on the 31 March 2020 (from inception to 31 March 2020). REVIEW METHODS: Only prevalence or incidence rates for mental health conditions from validated tools were included. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by two reviewers. Meta‐analyses and subgroup analyses were produced for pandemic period (pre‐ and post), age, country income, country, clinical setting for major depression disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). RESULTS: No studies of incidence were found. Prevalence estimates showed that the most common mental health condition was PTSD (21.7%) followed by anxiety disorder (16.1%), MDD (13.4%) and acute stress disorder (7.4%) (low risk of bias). For symptoms of these conditions there was substantial variation in the prevalence estimates for depression (95% confidence interval [CI]:31.8%; 60.5%), anxiety (95% CI:34.2%; 57.7%) and PTSD symptoms (95% CI,21.4%; 65.4%) (moderate risk of bias). Age, level of exposure and type of care professional were identified as important moderating factors. CONCLUSION: Mental disorders affect healthcare workers during and after infectious disease pandemics, with higher proportions experiencing symptoms. IMPACT: This review provides prevalence estimates of mental health conditions during and after a pandemic which could be used to inform service staffing impact and formulation of preventative strategies, by identifying clinical populations who may be at high risk of developing mental health symptoms and conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9111784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91117842022-05-17 The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis Hill, James Edward Harris, Catherine Danielle L., Christian Boland, Paul Doherty, Alison J. Benedetto, Valerio Gita, Bhutani E. Clegg, Andrew J. J Adv Nurs Reviews AIMS: This review aims to explore the prevalence and incidence rates of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic outbreak and which factors influence rates. BACKGROUND: Pandemics place considerable burden on care services, impacting on workers' health and their ability to deliver services. We systematically reviewed the prevalence and incidence of mental health conditions in care workers during pandemics. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO for cohort, cross‐sectional and case–control studies were undertaken on the 31 March 2020 (from inception to 31 March 2020). REVIEW METHODS: Only prevalence or incidence rates for mental health conditions from validated tools were included. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by two reviewers. Meta‐analyses and subgroup analyses were produced for pandemic period (pre‐ and post), age, country income, country, clinical setting for major depression disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). RESULTS: No studies of incidence were found. Prevalence estimates showed that the most common mental health condition was PTSD (21.7%) followed by anxiety disorder (16.1%), MDD (13.4%) and acute stress disorder (7.4%) (low risk of bias). For symptoms of these conditions there was substantial variation in the prevalence estimates for depression (95% confidence interval [CI]:31.8%; 60.5%), anxiety (95% CI:34.2%; 57.7%) and PTSD symptoms (95% CI,21.4%; 65.4%) (moderate risk of bias). Age, level of exposure and type of care professional were identified as important moderating factors. CONCLUSION: Mental disorders affect healthcare workers during and after infectious disease pandemics, with higher proportions experiencing symptoms. IMPACT: This review provides prevalence estimates of mental health conditions during and after a pandemic which could be used to inform service staffing impact and formulation of preventative strategies, by identifying clinical populations who may be at high risk of developing mental health symptoms and conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-12 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9111784/ /pubmed/35150151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15175 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Hill, James Edward
Harris, Catherine
Danielle L., Christian
Boland, Paul
Doherty, Alison J.
Benedetto, Valerio
Gita, Bhutani E.
Clegg, Andrew J.
The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15175
work_keys_str_mv AT hilljamesedward theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT harriscatherine theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daniellelchristian theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bolandpaul theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dohertyalisonj theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT benedettovalerio theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gitabhutanie theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cleggandrewj theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hilljamesedward prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT harriscatherine prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daniellelchristian prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bolandpaul prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dohertyalisonj prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT benedettovalerio prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gitabhutanie prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cleggandrewj prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis