Cargando…
The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
AIMS: This review aims to explore the prevalence and incidence rates of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic outbreak and which factors influence rates. BACKGROUND: Pandemics place considerable burden on care services, impacting on workers' health and their...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15175 |
_version_ | 1784709305602146304 |
---|---|
author | Hill, James Edward Harris, Catherine Danielle L., Christian Boland, Paul Doherty, Alison J. Benedetto, Valerio Gita, Bhutani E. Clegg, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Hill, James Edward Harris, Catherine Danielle L., Christian Boland, Paul Doherty, Alison J. Benedetto, Valerio Gita, Bhutani E. Clegg, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Hill, James Edward |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: This review aims to explore the prevalence and incidence rates of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic outbreak and which factors influence rates. BACKGROUND: Pandemics place considerable burden on care services, impacting on workers' health and their ability to deliver services. We systematically reviewed the prevalence and incidence of mental health conditions in care workers during pandemics. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO for cohort, cross‐sectional and case–control studies were undertaken on the 31 March 2020 (from inception to 31 March 2020). REVIEW METHODS: Only prevalence or incidence rates for mental health conditions from validated tools were included. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by two reviewers. Meta‐analyses and subgroup analyses were produced for pandemic period (pre‐ and post), age, country income, country, clinical setting for major depression disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). RESULTS: No studies of incidence were found. Prevalence estimates showed that the most common mental health condition was PTSD (21.7%) followed by anxiety disorder (16.1%), MDD (13.4%) and acute stress disorder (7.4%) (low risk of bias). For symptoms of these conditions there was substantial variation in the prevalence estimates for depression (95% confidence interval [CI]:31.8%; 60.5%), anxiety (95% CI:34.2%; 57.7%) and PTSD symptoms (95% CI,21.4%; 65.4%) (moderate risk of bias). Age, level of exposure and type of care professional were identified as important moderating factors. CONCLUSION: Mental disorders affect healthcare workers during and after infectious disease pandemics, with higher proportions experiencing symptoms. IMPACT: This review provides prevalence estimates of mental health conditions during and after a pandemic which could be used to inform service staffing impact and formulation of preventative strategies, by identifying clinical populations who may be at high risk of developing mental health symptoms and conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9111784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91117842022-05-17 The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis Hill, James Edward Harris, Catherine Danielle L., Christian Boland, Paul Doherty, Alison J. Benedetto, Valerio Gita, Bhutani E. Clegg, Andrew J. J Adv Nurs Reviews AIMS: This review aims to explore the prevalence and incidence rates of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic outbreak and which factors influence rates. BACKGROUND: Pandemics place considerable burden on care services, impacting on workers' health and their ability to deliver services. We systematically reviewed the prevalence and incidence of mental health conditions in care workers during pandemics. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO for cohort, cross‐sectional and case–control studies were undertaken on the 31 March 2020 (from inception to 31 March 2020). REVIEW METHODS: Only prevalence or incidence rates for mental health conditions from validated tools were included. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by two reviewers. Meta‐analyses and subgroup analyses were produced for pandemic period (pre‐ and post), age, country income, country, clinical setting for major depression disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). RESULTS: No studies of incidence were found. Prevalence estimates showed that the most common mental health condition was PTSD (21.7%) followed by anxiety disorder (16.1%), MDD (13.4%) and acute stress disorder (7.4%) (low risk of bias). For symptoms of these conditions there was substantial variation in the prevalence estimates for depression (95% confidence interval [CI]:31.8%; 60.5%), anxiety (95% CI:34.2%; 57.7%) and PTSD symptoms (95% CI,21.4%; 65.4%) (moderate risk of bias). Age, level of exposure and type of care professional were identified as important moderating factors. CONCLUSION: Mental disorders affect healthcare workers during and after infectious disease pandemics, with higher proportions experiencing symptoms. IMPACT: This review provides prevalence estimates of mental health conditions during and after a pandemic which could be used to inform service staffing impact and formulation of preventative strategies, by identifying clinical populations who may be at high risk of developing mental health symptoms and conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-12 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9111784/ /pubmed/35150151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15175 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Hill, James Edward Harris, Catherine Danielle L., Christian Boland, Paul Doherty, Alison J. Benedetto, Valerio Gita, Bhutani E. Clegg, Andrew J. The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilljamesedward theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT harriscatherine theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daniellelchristian theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bolandpaul theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dohertyalisonj theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT benedettovalerio theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gitabhutanie theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cleggandrewj theprevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hilljamesedward prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT harriscatherine prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daniellelchristian prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bolandpaul prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dohertyalisonj prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT benedettovalerio prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gitabhutanie prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cleggandrewj prevalenceofmentalhealthconditionsinhealthcareworkersduringandafterapandemicsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |